{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["emissions inventory"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'emissions inventory' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=emissions+inventory","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"cer-000753","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-000753","title":"Comments on the Draft National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory System (NAEIS) Reporting Regulations","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2014-02-21","source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CER-submissions-on-NAEIS-Reporting-Regulations_21-Feb-2014-....pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), representing several environmental justice organisations, submitted comments on 21 February 2014 regarding the Draft National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory System (NAEIS) Reporting Regulations. The submission primarily argues that the draft regulations fail to ensure adequate public access to atmospheric emission data and provides recommendations to align the regulations with constitutional rights to information and a healthy environment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The CER argues that the period provided for public comment on the Draft NAEIS Regulations was unreasonable and procedurally unfair, noting that stakeholders were only notified of the 21 February 2014 deadline during a workshop on 6 February 2014.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The CER criticizes Draft Regulation 11 for failing to define \"confidential information,\" which they claim creates a false impression that all emission data may be confidential and allows industries to avoid disclosure.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"To address confidentiality concerns, the CER suggests adopting a model similar to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), where the default is public access and the submitter must provide upfront, detailed substantiation for any claims of Confidential Business Information (CBI).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The CER recommends deleting Draft Regulation 12(1)(a) regarding \"unfair competition,\" arguing it is redundant because the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) already protects the commercial interests of third parties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The CER proposes rewording Draft Regulation 12 to establish that placing NAEIS data and information in the public domain should be the default position, rather than a discretionary action by the relevant authority.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The submission asserts that automatic public access to emission data is necessary to fulfill constitutional rights to a healthy environment and access to information, and to reduce the administrative burden of processing PAIA requests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000753#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["air quality","environmental governance","public participation","emissions inventory"],"geography_discussed":["Johannesburg","Durban","Vaal Triangle"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Policy Comment","Legal Submission"]},{"id":"cer-001157","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-001157","title":"matimba-health-risk-assessment_2-cb9029b2ff38c612.pdf","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Matimba-Health-Risk-Assessment_2.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report details the methodology and emissions inventory used for an air pollution health risk analysis concerning the existing Matimba Power Station and the proposed Project Alpha Power Station in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. It describes the use of CALMET and CALPUFF dispersion models to simulate pollutant concentrations and the subsequent application of dose-response relationships to estimate health risks, specifically total non-accidental mortality and respiratory hospital admissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The study utilized a combination of CALMET and CALPUFF dispersion models to simulate maximum hourly, daily, and annual average pollutant concentrations, accounting for complex terrain effects such as curved plume trajectories and spatial meteorological variability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The health risk assessment methodology involves superimposing predicted pollutant concentrations over 2001 Census spatial population data from Stats SA and applying international dose-response functions to estimate increases in 'total non-accidental mortality' and 'respiratory hospital admissions'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The existing Matimba Power Station is a coal-fired facility with a total nominal capacity of 3990 MW and a net maximum capacity of 3690 MW. While it employs particulate abatement technology that reduces emissions by over 99%, it has no abatement measures for sulphur dioxide (SO2) or nitrogen oxides (NOx).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"For the proposed Project Alpha Power Station, the study analyzed a configuration consisting of a 4800 MW pulverised fuel (PF) plant with a 220 m high stack and controls designed to achieve 90% sulphur dioxide control efficiency.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The emissions inventory identifies several sources of air pollution in the study area beyond the power stations, including brickworks at Hanglip, household fuel combustion, coal mining at Grootegeluk Mine, and fugitive dust from ash dumps.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Household fuel burning in the Lephalale Municipality wards within the study area relies heavily on wood, used by approximately 6,100 households, followed by paraffin (~1,100 households) and coal (~30 households).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001157#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","air pollution","coal-fired power plants","health risk assessment","emissions inventory"],"geography_discussed":["Hanglip"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["dispersion modelling","health impact assessment"]}]}