{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["ecosystem management"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'ecosystem management' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=ecosystem+management","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"iisd-000566","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-000566","title":"Using Technology to Solve Today's Water Challenges","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2018-10-11","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/using-technology-solve-todays-water-challenges","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report by the International Institute for Sustainable Development examines eight case studies of organizations utilizing innovative technologies—including blockchain, artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things—to improve data processing and decision-making for the protection of freshwater resources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000566#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The report presents eight case studies demonstrating how governments, businesses, and citizens use technologies such as blockchain and Artificial Intelligence to make informed decisions regarding water resources and freshwater health.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000566#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Organizations are developing innovative methods to harness and process the increasing flow of data on freshwater health to improve ecosystem understanding and engage citizen scientists.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000566#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document explores the role of fintech opportunities and specific technologies, including big data, the Internet of things, blockchain, and artificial intelligence, in supporting smarter ecosystem management.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000566#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["freshwater","ecosystem management","water resources","data technology"],"geography_discussed":["Stockholm"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study"]},{"id":"cdkn-000176","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cdkn-000176","title":"Inside Story : Building resilience to climate change locally - The case of Valenzuela City, Metro Manila","publisher":{"name":"Climate and Development Knowledge Network","organization":"climate-and-development-knowledge-network"},"document_type":"case study","language":"en","date_published":"2015-03-18","source_url":"https://cdkn.org/resource/inside-story-building-resilience-climate-change-valenzuela-manila","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This case study examines climate resilience efforts in Valenzuela City, Metro Manila, focusing on its vulnerability to flooding and its participation in the Partners for Resilience (PfR) programme to integrate climate change adaptation and ecosystem management into disaster risk reduction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000176#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Valenzuela City is highly vulnerable to flooding due to its low-lying geography and its location at the confluence of the Tullahan, Polo, and Meycauayan rivers. Flooding occurs during high tides and regularly as flash floods during the rainy season, with stagnant water sometimes remaining for up to 4 weeks because of improper solid waste disposal, insufficient drainage, and excessive water volume. These events lead to health risks including leptospirosis, dengue, coughs, and colds, and cause economic losses for office workers and small businesses such as fish-food processors, furniture makers, street vendors, and small-scale autorepair shops.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000176#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"In 2011, Valenzuela City became one of five project areas in the Philippines under the Partners for Resilience (PfR) programme, a collaboration between five Netherlands-based organisations and 30 civil society partners in the global South. The programme seeks to build resilient communities by combining ecosystem management and restoration, climate change adaptation, and disaster risk reduction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000176#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The case study identifies several factors for building urban resilience: the use of partnerships and networking to sustain programmes and innovation; the integration of climate science and information across different timescales; and the use of local ordinances and national laws. It notes that while climate- and ecosystem-smart disaster risk reduction is feasible at the city level, it requires resources, time, and commitment from community members and local chief executives. Furthermore, local governments are advised to plan holistic interventions rather than treating disaster risk reduction, ecosystem management, and climate change adaptation as isolated concepts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000176#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate change adaptation","disaster risk reduction","urban resilience","flooding","ecosystem management"],"geography_discussed":["Metro Manila","Philippines"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study"]},{"id":"cer-000974","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-000974","title":"GENERAL POLICY REGARDING TERRESTRIAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"1994-05-09","source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/General-policy-regarding-terrestrial-and-marine-protected-areas.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The 'General Policy Regarding Terrestrial and Marine Protected Areas', published on 9 May 1994 under the Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, establishes a six-category classification system for protected areas in South Africa. This system shifts away from treating all protected areas as 'sacrosanct wildlife sanctuaries' to incorporate the needs of local communities and align with international trends in nature conservation management.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Category I consists of scientific reserves and wilderness areas. Scientific reserves are primarily for 'scientific research and/or environmental monitoring' and limit public access to 'accredited research scientists'. Wilderness areas are large, unmodified areas managed to preserve natural conditions for 'human physical and spiritual well-being', emphasizing 'Non-mechanised and strictly controlled access'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Category II covers National Parks and equivalent reserves, which are large natural areas designed to protect ecological integrity and exclude 'exploitation or intensive occupation'. These areas must be large enough to sustain 'viable, free-living populations' of wild species, including predators, without requiring 'unrealistic control measures' to protect nearby farming or development.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Category III is designated for natural monuments and areas of cultural significance. These are typically smaller sites protecting 'one or more features of outstanding significance' due to their 'uniqueness, rarity or representivity'. They can be managed by government agencies, non-profit trusts, corporations, or private landowners.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Category IV focuses on habitat and wildlife management areas where 'human intervention' is used to maintain sustainable populations and protect rare or threatened species. Management may include 'habitat manipulation', such as using grazing to protect specific grasslands or removing reeds from marshes for waterfowl.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Category V defines protected land/seascapes as areas resulting from the 'harmonious interaction of people and nature'. These areas protect cultural manifestations, traditional practices like 'agriculture, grazing or fishing', and aesthetically unique settlement patterns while providing for recreation and tourism.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Category VI establishes sustainable use areas, which are predominantly natural areas managed to protect biological diversity while providing a 'sustainable flow of natural products'. Management is preferably conducted 'in partnership with the local community' and these areas can serve as 'buffers and links' within a wider network of protected areas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000974#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity","nature conservation","protected areas","ecosystem management"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy framework","classification system"]}]}