{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["climate action"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'climate action' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":4,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=climate+action","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"clipolin-000153","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000153","title":"Preliminary Stocktake of G20 Strategies and Practices: A Contribution to the Brazilian G20 Presidency's Global Initiative on Bioeconomy","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-05-06","source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/preliminary-stocktake-of-g20-strategies-and-practices-a-contribution-to-the-brazilian-g20-presidencys-global-initiative-on-bioeconomy/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report provides a preliminary stocktake of G20 members' strategies and practices regarding the bioeconomy to support the Brazilian G20 Presidency's Global Initiative on Bioeconomy (GIB) in 2024. It identifies common thematic axes, suggests high-level principles for a sustainable bioeconomy, and proposes five key themes for a future program of work to foster international cooperation and learning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000153#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The global bioeconomy is experiencing significant growth, with the World Bioeconomy Forum estimating its current total value at approximately US$4 trillion and predicting it will reach US$30 trillion by 2050, representing one-third of global economic value. Specific national projections include China, which expects its bioeconomy to be valued at US$3.3 trillion by the end of 2025, and India, which has seen double-digit growth rates in recent years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000153#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"While G20 members have diverse priorities and definitions of the bioeconomy, their approaches are generally aligned across three primary thematic axes: biotechnology (focused on research, development, and innovation), bioresources (focused on the sustainable use of biodiversity), and bio-ecology (focused on broader sustainable development).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000153#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The report proposes that the G20 Initiative on Bioeconomy establish a set of high-level principles to ensure the future global bioeconomy is regenerative of biodiversity, supports climate action, delivers equitable economic outcomes, and supports the transition of the real economy toward sustainable development.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000153#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Five themes are identified as a potential foundation for a G20 Initiative on Bioeconomy program of work: the integration of the bioeconomy into economic and green growth plans; the impact on livelihoods and equity (especially for indigenous peoples, local communities, and small-scale farmers); the role of sustainable finance; the facilitation of 'biotrade'; and the development of measurement methodologies and indicators.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000153#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["bioeconomy","sustainable development","biodiversity","climate action","sustainable finance"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","India"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Stocktake","Policy Recommendation"]},{"id":"cambioco-000001","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cambioco-000001","title":"Resiliencia alimentaria: la historia de un proyecto educativo en las escuelas colombianas","publisher":{"name":"Somos El Cambio","organization":"somos-el-cambio"},"document_type":"case study","language":"es","date_published":"2024-04-17","source_url":"https://cambio.com.co/articulo/resiliencia-alimentaria-la-historia-de-un-proyecto-educativo-en-las-escuelas-colombianas/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document describes 'Como Con Eco', an educational project implemented in Colombian schools and universities to raise awareness about food resilience and climate action. Executed by the social enterprise 2811 and EAN University with funding from Fundación Botnar, the project aims to transform students into 'agents of change' by teaching them about the food production chain and sustainable systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 'Como Con Eco' project defines a resilient food system as one that is prepared for adverse situations caused by climate change and empowers communities to make their own decisions regarding food through knowledge of food origins, self-cultivation, waste management, and local governance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The project was implemented over three years across public and private schools using a practical methodology described as: providing knowledge, receiving a solution to a problem from students, and implementing that solution via a food laboratory.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The first phase of the project focused on knowledge delivery, which included the creation of a tool kit for urban challenges and technological solutions in schools, as well as a climate action and food resilience training course attended by approximately 1,000 people.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The second phase involved putting knowledge into practice, featuring a 'Climathon' where 378 students from 30 different schools proposed solutions to territorial climate challenges. To qualify for the final stage, schools had to meet requirements over six months, including having at least five teachers complete the project's initial course.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"In the third year, 10 selected schools implemented food laboratories consisting of three components: mobile gardens for the full production process (cultivation, sowing, and harvesting); climate action proposals based on environmental calculations of water, energy, and waste; and training in nutrition, climate action, and gastronomic natural heritage.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cambioco-000001#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate action","food systems","education","sustainability"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Case Study"]},{"id":"iai-001022","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iai-001022","title":"The IAI regional assessment","publisher":{"name":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research","organization":"inter-american-institute-for-global-change-research"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023-05-15","source_url":"https://archive.iai.int/administrador/assets/images/ckfinder/files/IAI-CoP-31-13-d-i-en.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This document, prepared by the IAI Directorate, presents preliminary findings from a Regional Assessment of IAI Parties' priorities regarding global change policy. The assessment utilized surveys, listening sessions, and the analysis of 86 policy documents to map the domestic and international global change policy landscape, identifying current and emerging priorities as well as barriers to integrating scientific information into decision-making.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate Action is the highest current policy priority for IAI Parties, with a high level of agreement across all information sources. This priority is significantly more important than the third-ranked priority, Water Security.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and Water Security are also top regional policy priorities, though agreement on the importance of biodiversity is lower than for climate action. Specific sub-regional priorities emerged: Water Security is a high priority for countries in the Arid Andes (Chile, Bolivia, and Peru), while Clean air, water, and soils is a priority for North America (US and Canada).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Emerging policy priorities emphasize the social impacts of Global Environmental Change. Focal points identified Human Health and Wellbeing as the most critical emerging priority, followed by Energy Security, while researchers identified Poverty and inequality as the most important.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The primary barriers to using scientific information in decision-making are a lack of inter-sectoral collaboration, a lack of information tailored for non-technical audiences, and competing governmental priorities. Additional barriers cited by researchers include a lack of political mandates and local/regional evidence, while focal points noted limited data analysis capacity and a lack of official databases.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Opportunities to improve the use of scientific information include international funding and cooperation, multilateral agreements, and transboundary dialogue spaces for focal points, while researchers highlighted the growing body of national and international evidence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001022#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate action","biodiversity","water security","global environmental change","energy security"],"geography_discussed":["Chile","Bolivia","Peru","United States","Canada","Argentina","Ecuador","Colombia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Regional Assessment","Policy Mapping"]},{"id":"iai-001232","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iai-001232","title":"Progress on the Regional Assessment","publisher":{"name":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research","organization":"inter-american-institute-for-global-change-research"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2022-10-13","source_url":"https://archive.iai.int/administrador/assets/images/ckfinder/files/IAI-EC-54-4-a-i-en.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This briefing outlines the progress of the Regional Assessment conducted by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). The assessment aims to identify knowledge gaps and uncertainties in decisions impacted by global environmental change (GEC) to better target science and capacity-building efforts for Member Countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Regional Assessment process involved scoping workshops in August 2021, an information session on 17 February 2022, and a regional survey distributed on 14 March 2022, which was completed by 17 of the 19 IAI Parties. Additionally, four sub-regional listening sessions took place between 12-21 July 2022 focusing on the Andean, Southern Cone, Central America and the Caribbean, and North America sub-regions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Preliminary survey results indicate that \"climate action\" is the primary current national priority for 14 Parties, while \"energy security\" and \"health and human well-being\" are the top emergent priorities, cited by 7 Parties each.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The primary obstacles to using scientific information for GEC decision-making are a lack of cross-sectoral collaboration and a lack of scientific information tailored for non-technical audiences, both cited by 10 Parties. Conversely, the greatest opportunities are funding and international cooperation for GEC, and multilateral commitments such as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), also cited by 10 Parties each.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"IAI Parties were grouped into three clusters based on current GEC priorities: one group (Colombia, Uruguay, Brazil, Canada, Costa Rica, and United States) prioritizes climate action, biodiversity, and clean air, water, and soil; a second group (Peru, Panama, Mexico, Jamaica, Paraguay, Guatemala, and Argentina) prioritizes food security, energy security, and climate action; and a third group (Bolivia, Ecuador, Chile, and Dominican Republic) prioritizes water security, climate action, and biodiversity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Sub-regional listening sessions highlighted specific priorities: the Southern Cone focused on climate action and water security (specifically the Del Plata Basin); the Andean region emphasized biodiversity, ecosystem services, and land-use planning in the Amazon basin; and North America, Central America, and the Caribbean focused on climate action and biodiversity, including issues like illegal fishing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-001232#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["global environmental change","climate action","biodiversity","water security","food security","energy security"],"geography_discussed":["Colombia","Uruguay","Brazil","Canada","Costa Rica","United States","Peru","Panama","Mexico","Jamaica","Paraguay","Guatemala","Argentina","Bolivia","Ecuador","Chile","Dominican Republic","Southern Cone","Andean","Central America","Caribbean","North America"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["survey","stakeholder consultation"]}]}