{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["clean power plan"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":191,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=clean+power+plan","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=clean+power+plan&page=2","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"cliint-000007","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cliint-000007","title":"Chamber of Commerce Suzanne Clark","publisher":{"name":"Center for Climate Integrity","organization":"center-for-climate-integrity"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2021-10-06","source_url":"https://climateintegrity.org/news/view/chamber-of-commerce-suzanne-clark","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Center for Climate Integrity asserts that the Chamber of Commerce has known about the dangers of fossil fuels since the 1980s but spent decades sowing doubt about climate science. The statement highlights the Chamber's role in the Global Climate Coalition, its lobbying efforts to weaken EPA regulations, and its financial support for politicians who oppose climate action, including funding a study used to justify the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000007#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Chamber of Commerce possessed knowledge of the link between fossil fuels and climate change as early as the 1980s. In 1989, official Harvey Alter gave a speech accurately predicting climate consequences such as drought in California, flooding in Bangladesh, and the spread of vector-borne disease, yet by 1991 the organization claimed that \"genuine scientific disputes remain\" regarding the existence and causes of global climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000007#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Between the Kyoto Protocol and the 2009 EPA Endangerment Finding, the Chamber used \"sixteen unique discourses of delay\" to promote skepticism about climate science and argue that climate action would damage the economy and jobs. The Chamber also served on the board of the Global Climate Coalition, which conducted a decade-long campaign to spread climate denial despite its own scientists confirming the consensus on dangerous global warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000007#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Chamber of Commerce has used its lobbying power to weaken U.S. climate policy and public health protections. Specific actions include lobbying to prevent the EPA from measuring how new fossil fuel infrastructure contributes to climate change, successfully opposing three moratoriums on offshore oil drilling, and opposing a resolution to nullify the repeal of the Clean Power Plan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000007#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organization has provided significant financial and strategic support to oppose climate action, including spending nearly $150 million on Congressional candidates opposed to climate action since Citizens United. In 2017, the Chamber funded a misleading economic study on the costs of the Paris Agreement, which President Trump cited as a reason for U.S. withdrawal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000007#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","fossil fuel industry","climate policy","Kyoto Protocol","Paris Agreement","Clean Power Plan","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Bangladesh","California"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","corporate accountability"]},{"id":"grelat-000074","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/grelat-000074","title":"GreenLatinos Statement on Trump Administration Proposal to Dismantle the Clean Power Plan and Sacrifice the Health of Our Communities","publisher":{"name":"GreenLatinos","organization":"greenlatinos"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2020-08-30","source_url":"https://www.greenlatinos.org/greenlatinos-statement-on-trump-administration-proposal-to-dismantle-the-clean-power-plan-and-sacrifice-the-health-of-our-communities/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"GreenLatinos condemns the Trump Administration's Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule as a dangerous replacement for the Clean Power Plan. The organization highlights that the ACE rule's regulatory analysis predicted 300 to 1,500 additional deaths annually by 2030 due to increased air pollution. GreenLatinos emphasizes the disproportionate impact on Latinx and African American communities, noting that 40% of Latinos live within 30 miles of a power plant and Latinx children face a 40% higher likelihood of dying from asthma compared to non-Latinx white children.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000074#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Trump Administration's own regulatory analysis of the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule indicated that its implementation could result in 300 to 1,500 additional deaths per year by 2030 due to increased air pollution from dirty power development.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000074#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ACE rule is expected to disproportionately affect Latinx and African American communities, who face higher exposure to air pollutants. Specifically, Latinx children are 40% more likely to die from asthma than non-Latinx white children, and approximately 40% of Latinos live within 30 miles of a power plant.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000074#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ACE rule is characterized as a replacement for the Clean Power Plan, which served as the first and only federal limit on carbon pollution from power plants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000074#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon dioxide emissions","air quality","power station","climate change","environmental justice","Clean Power Plan"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"ucs-000331","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ucs-000331","title":"Endangering Generations","publisher":{"name":"Union of Concerned Scientists","organization":"union-of-concerned-scientists"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-02","source_url":"https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/childrens-health-report-appendix.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document outlines the technical approaches used to estimate children's exposure to chlorpyrifos and PFAS, the process for tracking children's product recalls, and the use of EPA Regulatory Impact Analyses to quantify the health benefits lost when air pollution standards were weakened or repealed.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"To estimate the number of children exposed to chlorpyrifos, the authors combined US Geological Survey land use data and 2016 county-level chlorpyrifos use data to identify contaminated farmland, then applied Census Bureau data for children under five to those specific geographic areas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) used GIS software to draw one, three, and five-mile radii around contaminated facilities to identify the number of schools, childcare facilities, and women of reproductive age (15-49) living nearby.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study quantified the potential health benefits for children that would have been achieved if air pollution policies were fully implemented, citing that the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (2011) would prevent 130,000 asthma exacerbations in children aged six to 18 and 80,000 lower respiratory symptoms in children aged seven to 14 annually.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Strengthening the ground-level ozone standard from 75 to 70 parts per billion was estimated to prevent 230,000 asthma exacerbations in children aged six to 18 nationwide (excluding California) and 160,000 lost school days for children aged five to 17 nationwide each year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Clean Power Plan, which was repealed and replaced by the Affordable Care Act, was projected to prevent between 74,000 and 90,000 asthma exacerbations in children aged six to 18 and 130,000 to 140,000 school absence days for children aged five to 17 annually by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Nitrogen Oxides State Implementation Plan (OAR 1998), which covered the District of Columbia and 20 states, was weakened by the Trump administration by making the most stringent air pollution monitoring non-mandatory.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 2012 Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy and Emissions Standards were estimated to prevent 3,500 asthma exacerbations in asthmatic children aged six to 18 and 2,100 lower respiratory symptoms in children aged eight to 12 annually by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000331#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances","air pollution","greenhouse gas emissions","environmental impact of mercury","environmental regulation","Clean Power Plan"],"geography_discussed":["California","District of Columbia","Alabama","Connecticut","Delaware","Illinois","Indiana","Kentucky","Maryland","Massachusetts","Michigan","New Jersey","New York","North Carolina","Ohio","Pennsylvania","Rhode Island","South Carolina","Tennessee","Virginia","West Virginia","Wisconsin"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodology","quantitative analysis","regulatory impact assessment"]},{"id":"catf-000010","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000010","title":"Affordable?… Clean?… Energy Rule","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2019-06-19","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2019/06/affordable-clean-energy-rule/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force criticizes the EPA's Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule for repealing the Clean Power Plan (CPP) and replacing it with a system focused on minor heat rate improvements for coal plants. The author contends that this approach ignores the existing trend of shifting toward cleaner energy sources and will lead to increased CO2 emissions and public health risks, including premature deaths. The document asserts that the ACE rule fails to employ the \"best system of emission reduction\" required by the Clean Air Act and announces plans to challenge the rule in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000010#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule replaces the Clean Power Plan (CPP) by allowing coal plants to implement minor heat rate improvements, which the author claims will lead to increased carbon dioxide emissions and other pollutants such as toxic mercury and deadly soot.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000010#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ACE rule is projected to increase emissions in 18 states and Washington, DC, with 28 percent of all coal plants expected to have higher total CO2 emissions by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000010#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The EPA's own analysis for the proposed ACE rule estimated that replacing the CPP with ACE would result in 1,630 premature deaths, including over 1,400 from fine particulate matter and additional deaths from ozone smog.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000010#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The final ACE rule is described as weaker than the proposal, predicting only a 1.5 percent efficiency increase at coal plants that make improvements, while 41 electric generating units (EGUs) are predicted to do nothing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000010#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","carbon dioxide emissions","Clean Power Plan","renewable energy","natural gas","nuclear power","carbon capture and storage","energy efficiency"],"geography_discussed":["Washington, D.C."],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","legal critique"]},{"id":"catf-000167","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000167","title":"CATF Statement on EPA’s Release of the Final “Affordable Clean Energy” (ACE) Rule","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2019-06-19","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2019/06/catf-statement-on-final-ace-rule/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) criticizes the EPA's Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, characterizing it as a \"life-extension program for coal plants\" that replaces the Clean Power Plan. CATF asserts that the ACE rule will increase carbon emissions and cause over 1,600 annual deaths by 2030 compared to the Clean Power Plan, while benefiting the coal industry at the expense of public health and the environment. Consequently, CATF intends to legally challenge the rule.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000167#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The ACE rule is described as a mechanism to extend the operational life of coal-fired power plants, which CATF claims will lead to increased emissions because these plants will become more economically competitive and run longer than they otherwise would.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000167#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The ACE rule is projected to have significant negative health and environmental outcomes, including an increase in emissions in 18 states and Washington, DC, and a forecast of over 1,600 annual deaths by 2030 when compared to the Clean Power Plan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000167#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","carbon dioxide emissions","Clean Power Plan","renewable energy","natural gas"],"geography_discussed":["Washington, D.C."],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"commyale-000247","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000247","title":"Politics & Global Warming","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2018-12","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/app/uploads/2019/02/Global-Warming-Policy-Politics-December-2018.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that a majority of US registered voters believe global warming is happening and human-caused, with notable increases in these beliefs among Republicans. There is broad cross-party support for clean energy policies like the Green New Deal and carbon taxes, though voters remain split on fossil fuel expansion. While many express a willingness to take collective action, few have actually contacted elected officials in the past year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A majority of registered voters (74%) believe global warming is occurring, with significant support among liberal Democrats (98%) and liberal/moderate Republicans (70%). Belief among conservative Republicans is lower at 42%, though this represents a five percentage point increase since October 2017.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"62% of registered voters believe global warming is primarily caused by human activities, the highest level since surveys began in 2008. This includes 90% of liberal Democrats and 53% of liberal/moderate Republicans, while only 28% of conservative Republicans agree.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Two-thirds of registered voters (67%) express worry about global warming, including 85% of liberal Democrats and 54% of liberal/moderate Republicans. Worry among conservative Republicans is at 32%, a nine-point increase since October 2017.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is broad support for the Green New Deal among registered voters (81%), including 92% of Democrats, 88% of Independents, and 64% of Republicans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Registered voters show strong support for several carbon-reduction policies: 71% support a revenue-neutral carbon tax and 71% support the Clean Power Plan's strict carbon dioxide emission limits on coal-fired power plants. A 'Fee and Dividend' policy is supported by 63% of voters.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"High levels of support exist for clean energy incentives and regulation: 88% support funding renewable energy research, 85% support tax rebates for energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels, and 79% support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Voters are divided on fossil fuel production: 48% support expanding offshore drilling for oil and natural gas, while only 32% support drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A majority of registered voters (75%) believe corporations and industry should do more to address global warming. Additionally, 69% believe the United States should reduce greenhouse gas emissions regardless of the actions of other countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Voters feel more capable of influencing local than national decision-makers. 51% are confident they can influence local businesses and 50% can influence local government, compared to 39% for corporations and 38% for the federal government.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite expressed willingness to engage in organized efforts, actual activity is low; only 13% of registered voters report contacting an elected official to urge action on global warming in the past 12 months.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000247#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","greenhouse gas emissions","carbon tax","carbon dioxide emissions","renewable energy","solar energy","wind power","energy efficiency","fossil fuel","Green New Deal","Clean Power Plan","climate policy"],"geography_discussed":["Alaska"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["public opinion survey","political analysis"]},{"id":"catf-000128","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000128","title":"Happy National Child Health Day?","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-10-09","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2018/10/happy-national-child-health-day/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The author criticizes the EPA for moving to undermine the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS), which reduce mercury and other air toxics from coal- and oil-fired power plants. The document highlights that MATS prevents 11,000 premature deaths and 130,000 asthma hospitalizations annually, noting that the EPA is using the benefits of MATS in its modeling to justify other rule rollbacks, such as the ACER rule, while simultaneously seeking to weaken MATS itself.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000128#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) provide substantial public health benefits by reducing mercury and over 80 other air toxics from oil and coal-fired power plants, including the prevention of 11,000 premature deaths, 4,700 heart attacks, and 130,000 asthma-related hospitalizations every year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000128#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["air pollution","coal-fired power station","public health","Clean Power Plan"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"ucs-000378","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ucs-000378","title":"Climate Accountability Scorecard","publisher":{"name":"Union of Concerned Scientists","organization":"union-of-concerned-scientists"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2018-10","source_url":"https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/climate-accountability-scorecard-2018-appendix-fair-effective-climate-policies.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report evaluates fossil fuel companies using a scoring guide that measures corporate political disclosure, engagement with Congress, and support for climate policies. It finds a wide disparity in performance, with some companies like ConocoPhillips and ExxonMobil receiving 'Good' scores for their policy frameworks, while others like CONSOL Energy and Arch Coal are rated 'Egregious' or 'Poor' due to their opposition to the Paris Agreement or lack of political transparency.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Union of Concerned Scientists uses a scoring guide to evaluate companies across four main areas: General Political Activity and Spending (via the CPA-Zicklin Index), Direct Influence on Climate Policy, Consistent support for US policy action to reduce carbon emissions, and Indirect Influence through business alliances.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"CONSOL Energy received an 'Egregious' score of -9 for supporting fair and effective climate policies, characterized by a total lack of information on political spending and silence on the Paris climate agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Arch Coal is rated 'Poor' with a score of -7, having publicly supported the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Peabody Energy is rated 'Fair' (score of 2) despite high marks for political disclosure; it actively opposed the Clean Power Plan and used 'climate science disinformation' by cherry-picking IPCC reports to justify its position.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips both received 'Good' scores of 3, with both companies expressing support for the Paris Agreement and advocating for a revenue-neutral carbon tax.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Royal Dutch Shell received a 'Good' score of 4, noting its support for the Paris Agreement's goal to limit temperature rise to 'well below two degrees Celsius (2°C)' and its membership in the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"BP is rated 'Fair' with a score of 2; while it supports carbon pricing and the Paris Agreement's aims, it failed to explicitly endorse the agreement's specific global temperature goal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000378#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon price","carbon tax","Paris Agreement","climate policy","greenhouse gas emissions","Clean Power Plan","climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability assessment","policy alignment analysis"]},{"id":"ucs-000739","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ucs-000739","title":"Climate Accountability at Peabody Energy","publisher":{"name":"Union of Concerned Scientists","organization":"union-of-concerned-scientists"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2018-10","source_url":"https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/10/gw-Accountability-scorecard18-Peabody-Energy.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Union of Concerned Scientists evaluated Peabody Energy's climate actions from July 2016 to June 2018, finding that while the company follows best practices in political spending disclosure, it remains 'egregious' in its lack of emissions reduction targets and its support for the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. The company is criticized for downplaying climate science in public statements and maintaining leadership roles in trade associations that spread climate disinformation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Peabody Energy demonstrates best practices in the disclosure, policy, and oversight of its corporate political spending, including public disclosure of contributions to candidates and the use of a specified board committee for oversight.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The company's public communications on climate change downplay the necessity of reducing emissions, framing fossil fuel emissions as a 'concern' rather than the primary cause of global warming and emphasizing coal's 'essential' role in energy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Peabody Energy maintains leadership and membership roles in several industry groups that spread climate disinformation, including the US Chamber of Commerce, the National Mining Association (NMA), and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), without distancing itself from their claims.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The company lacks any formal plans or targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from its own operations or the use of its products, and it does not utilize an internal carbon price for investment decisions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Peabody Energy actively opposed the Clean Power Plan using climate science disinformation and publicly supported the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While the company identifies some regulatory and physical risks, it fails to specify the potential impact of climate liability lawsuits or the specific role of climate change in contributing to physical risks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-000739#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","greenhouse gas emissions","Paris Agreement","Clean Power Plan","carbon price","coal"],"geography_discussed":["United States","St. Louis"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate accountability assessment","scorecard"]},{"id":"catf-000095","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000095","title":"CATF Statement on Final BLM Methane Waste Rule Final Rollback","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-09-18","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2018/09/catf-statement-final-blm-methane-waste-rule-final-rollback/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force (CATF) condemns the rollback of the BLM Methane Waste Rule, noting that the rule previously reduced annual methane emissions by 175,000-180,000 tons. CATF asserts that the rollback will cost taxpayers millions of dollars due to wasted natural gas and increased air pollution, while threatening the health of tens of thousands of people living near oil and gas wells on public lands.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000095#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Methane Waste Rule, while in effect, achieved an annual reduction of methane emissions from the oil and gas industry by approximately 175,000-180,000 tons through requirements for operators to prevent natural gas waste.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000095#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) estimated that the elimination of the rule would result in costs to taxpayers amounting to many millions of dollars, stemming from wasted natural gas and negative public health effects caused by increased air pollution, specifically from flared natural gas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000095#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Air pollution from oil and gas wells on public lands threatens the health of at least 74,000 people living within a half-mile radius across six western states with significant oil and gas activity, according to a study by Earthworks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000095#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","petroleum industry","air pollution","public health","Clean Power Plan","climate change"],"geography_discussed":["Western United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"catf-000446","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000446","title":"CATF Statement on Proposed Repeal of Clean Power Plan","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-08-21","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2018/08/proposed-repeal-clean-power-plan/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force opposes the EPA's proposed replacement of the Clean Power Plan, arguing it violates the Clean Air Act and would lead to approximately 1,000 avoidable deaths per year by extending the operation of old coal plants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000446#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The EPA's proposed replacement of the Clean Power Plan contradicts the Clean Air Act's mandate to protect human health and the environment, as well as the 2009 Endangerment Finding which established that carbon pollution poses significant risks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000446#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed policy, referred to by CATF as the 'Dirty Power Plan', would likely increase pollution and cause roughly 1,000 avoidable deaths annually by encouraging coal plants to operate longer under 'heat rate improvement' measures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000446#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"According to the IPCC and IEA, carbon capture and storage technology is a requirement for coal plants to be part of a decarbonized world.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000446#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","carbon capture and storage","Clean Power Plan","carbon dioxide emissions","decarbonization"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"wri-000436","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-000436","title":"Trump’s Power Plan Will Lead to More Emissions, Costs and Deaths","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-08-21","source_url":"https://www.wri.org/news/statement-trumps-power-plan-will-lead-more-emissions-costs-and-deaths","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The World Resources Institute argues that the Trump administration's proposal to replace the Clean Power Plan will undermine U.S. climate strategy by providing loopholes for power plants, leading to higher greenhouse gas emissions and up to 1,400 premature deaths annually.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000436#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Trump administration's proposal to replace the Clean Power Plan is designed to provide power plants with more loopholes and latitude regarding the management of pollutants and greenhouse gases, which the EPA's Regulatory Impact Analysis indicates will increase U.S. emissions, costs, and health impacts, including up to 1,400 premature deaths every year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000436#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite a surge in clean energy commitments and innovation from U.S. cities, states, and companies, the Trump administration is attempting to support older and dirtier energy sources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000436#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["greenhouse gas","Clean Power Plan","air pollution","clean energy","climate policy"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"catf-000038","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000038","title":"What Americans Need to Hear from EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-01-30","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2018/01/epa-administrator-scott-pruitt/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force challenges EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt on the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, the suspension of methane New Source Performance Standards for the oil and gas industry, and the rollback of air toxics policies, arguing these actions contradict the EPA's mandate to protect public health and rely on scientific evidence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The author questions the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, noting that the Trump administration itself acknowledged the plan could prevent up to 4,500 premature deaths annually by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document argues that the EPA has a legal obligation under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, upheld by the US Supreme Court, to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author criticizes the proposed two-year stay of the methane New Source Performance Standards for the oil and gas industry, stating that oil and gas activities emit at least 8.1 million metric tons of methane annually and that emissions could be cut by 40 percent for a production cost increase of only one penny per thousand cubic feet.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document highlights a lack of updated reporting on the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), noting that the only report produced (in 2011) detailed environmental damage to air, water, and soil.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author points to a rollback of a 23-year-old policy protecting the public from industrial air toxics—including benzene, arsenic, mercury, and acid gases—announced by Deputy Administrator William Wehrum without public notice or comment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000038#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["greenhouse gas","methane","carbon dioxide emissions","power station","Clean Power Plan","biofuel","air pollution","petroleum industry"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]},{"id":"catf-000438","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000438","title":"CATF Statement on Pruitt Recusal Letter on CPP Rulemaking","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2018-01-29","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2018/01/pruitt-recusal-letter-cpp-rulemaking/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force and 10 other organizations, following 19 states and cities, have requested that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt recuse himself from the rulemaking process to repeal the Clean Power Plan. The groups argue that Pruitt's public assertions that the repeal is a \"done deal\" demonstrate a \"closed mind,\" effectively turning the public comment period, which runs until late April, into a \"pro forma exercise.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000438#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Clean Air Task Force and 10 other organizations, including the Appalachian Mountain Club, Clean Air Council, Clean Wisconsin, Conservation Law Foundation, and National Parks Conservation Association, have joined 19 states and cities in requesting that EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt recuse himself from the Clean Power Plan repeal process.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000438#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The organizations argue that the public comment period for the repeal, which ends in late April, has become a meaningless exercise because Pruitt's public statements suggest the repeal is already decided.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000438#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Clean Power Plan","power station","environmental regulation","Environmental Protection Agency"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"wri-000677","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-000677","title":"INSIDER: The Climate Effect of the Trump Administration","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2017-12-06","source_url":"https://www.wri.org/insights/insider-climate-effect-trump-administration","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document analyzes the potential impact of the Trump administration's reversal of climate policies, such as the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, on U.S. emissions. It synthesizes data from seven organizations, estimating that 2025 emissions under Trump's policies would range from 5.6 to 6.8 GtCO2e, exceeding the U.S. Paris Agreement target. It also examines the potential for states, cities, and companies—represented by the 'We Are Still In' campaign—to offset these increases through clean energy transitions and local policy defense.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000677#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Synthesis of seven studies indicates that if the Trump administration's policies are implemented, U.S. emissions in 2025 are projected to be between 5.6 and 6.8 Gt carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). This is higher than the estimated 5.0 to 6.6 GtCO2e that would have occurred under Obama's policies, and significantly above the U.S. Paris Agreement target of 4.8 to 4.9 GtCO2e.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000677#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The U.S. decision to not meet its nationally determined contribution (NDC) could have a measurable global impact; one study by Climate Interactive suggests global emissions in 2025 would reach 57.3 GtCO2e compared to 55.8 GtCO2e if the NDC were achieved, potentially resulting in 0.3 degrees C (0.5 degrees F) more warming.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000677#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Trump administration has targeted several key climate policies for rollback, most notably the Clean Power Plan, which is identified as the primary driver of emissions reductions under the previous administration. Other targeted areas include methane emissions from oil and gas equipment, vehicle emission standards, and hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) policies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000677#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational and corporate actors may be able to offset federal rollbacks. A Sierra Club analysis suggests that accelerated coal replacement, defense of existing policies, and local clean energy transitions could reduce 2025 emissions by nearly 4.5 GtCO2e. Additionally, over 2,500 non-federal actors representing more than half of the U.S. economy have pledged support for Paris Agreement goals via the 'We Are Still In' campaign.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000677#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["greenhouse gas emissions","Paris Agreement","Clean Power Plan","Nationally Determined Contributions","methane","hydrofluorocarbon","coal power","clean energy","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["World","Syria","California"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","emissions projection","literature synthesis"]},{"id":"catf-000424","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000424","title":"Policy Administrator Pruitt Appoints Himself Judge, Jury and Executioner of the Clean Power Plan","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2017-10-13","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/2017/10/administrator-pruitt-appoints-himself/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Clean Air Task Force criticizes EPA Administrator Pruitt for attempting to repeal the Clean Power Plan by asserting that the EPA only has authority to mandate 'inside the fence' measures at individual plants. The authors argue that Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act allows for a 'best system of emission reduction' that includes shifting to cleaner energy sources, noting that compliance costs for CO2 reduction dropped from $26/ton at the plan's finalization to $17/ton by January 2017. The document contends that Pruitt is prioritizing the coal industry over public health and has inappropriately requested that the D.C. Circuit Court delay its decision on the plan's legality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000424#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"EPA Administrator Pruitt argues that the EPA lacks the authority to implement system-wide carbon emission reductions, claiming that greenhouse gas targets must be limited to measures applied at individual plants, described as \"inside the fence.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000424#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors contend that Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act does not limit the \"system\" of emission reduction to \"inside the fence\" measures and that the \"best\" system should include current industry trends such as increased reliance on cleaner energy sources and end-use energy efficiency.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000424#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Compliance costs for CO2 reduction under the Clean Power Plan were estimated at $26/ton when finalized, but updated figures from January 2017 showed costs had decreased to $17/ton.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000424#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Clean Power Plan","greenhouse gas emissions","renewable energy","natural gas","energy efficiency"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","legal critique"]},{"id":"wri-000312","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-000312","title":"Repealing the Clean Power Plan Disregards Health, Environment and Economics","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2017-10-10","source_url":"https://www.wri.org/news/statement-repealing-clean-power-plan-disregards-health-environment-and-economics","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The World Resources Institute criticizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan, which aimed to reduce power plant carbon emissions by 32 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. The organization argues that the repeal disregards the U.S. obligation to mitigate global climate impacts and falsely suggests that such a move would revive the coal industry, which is declining due to the lower cost of natural gas and renewable energy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000312#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Clean Power Plan was the first national strategy to limit carbon pollution from power plants, with a target of reducing emissions to 32 percent below 2005 levels by the year 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000312#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The decline of the coal industry is driven by economics rather than regulation, as coal is more expensive and more polluting than alternatives such as renewable energy and natural gas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000312#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The WRI contends that the Trump administration's proposal to withdraw the plan ignores the contribution of U.S. emissions to global climate impacts and the resulting risks, such as intensified hurricanes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000312#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon dioxide emissions","power station","climate change","coal","natural gas","renewable energy","Clean Power Plan"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis"]},{"id":"polint-000096","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/polint-000096","title":"The Falling Cost of Clean Power Plan Compliance","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Policy Integrity","organization":"institute-for-policy-integrity"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2017-10-02","source_url":"https://policyintegrity.org/publications/detail/the-falling-cost-of-clean-power-plan-compliance","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags"],"summary":{"text":"The report examines the Clean Power Plan, a 2015 EPA rule aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. It argues that compliance costs are now lower than the EPA's initial Regulatory Impact Analysis suggested due to changes in the electric sector and findings from independent analyses.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"polint-000096#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2015 Clean Power Plan was designed to mitigate climate change by reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants fueled by fossil fuels, with the EPA initially determining that the rule's climate and health benefits would significantly exceed its compliance costs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"polint-000096#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon dioxide emissions","Clean Power Plan","electric power industry"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":[]},{"id":"eesi-000035","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/eesi-000035","title":"The U.S. Climate Alliance and Related Actions","publisher":{"name":"Environmental and Energy Study Institute","organization":"environmental-and-energy-study-institute"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2017-08-14","source_url":"https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-the-u.s.-climate-alliance-and-related-actions","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The United States Climate Alliance, formed on June 1, 2017, is a bipartisan group of 13 states and one territory committed to reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 26-28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025. This effort is part of a broader movement including the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda, the \"We Are Still In\" coalition, and the Under2 MOU, all aimed at filling the policy void created by the Trump Administration's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. These subnational actors seek to maintain targets such as keeping global warming below 2 degrees Celsius and achieving 100 percent renewable power in some cities, though they face challenges regarding funding and the lack of a federal mandate.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000035#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The United States Climate Alliance consists of 13 states and one U.S. territory, representing 32.3 percent of the U.S. population and 37.7 percent of its GDP as of 2016. The group aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 26-28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025 and meet or exceed the U.S. Clean Power Plan's target of a 32 percent reduction by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000035#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Various city-led and private sector initiatives have emerged to support the Paris Agreement, including the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda (MNCAA), which represents 359 U.S. cities and 66 million Americans. Additionally, the \"We Are Still In\" coalition includes signatories from 245 cities and counties, nine states, 324 colleges and universities, and 1,709 businesses and investors, representing 120 million Americans and $6.2 trillion in economic contributions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000035#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational actors are pursuing specific policy and financial actions to replace federal commitments, such as the U.S. Conference of Mayors passing a resolution for 100 percent renewable power over the next decade and former Mayor Michael Bloomberg donating $15 million to the UNFCCC. Some states are also considering legislation to allow taxpayers to send tax rebates to the Green Climate Fund.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000035#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document notes that without federal mandates or funding, subnational entities may lack the resources to follow through on pledges and will likely vary in how they implement and enforce their climate actions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000035#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Paris Agreement","greenhouse gas emissions","carbon dioxide emissions","climate finance","Green Climate Fund","carbon tax","Clean Power Plan"],"geography_discussed":["World","People's Republic of China","Syria","Nicaragua"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","fact sheet"]},{"id":"eesi-000496","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/eesi-000496","title":"The U.S. Climate Alliance and Related Actions","publisher":{"name":"Environmental and Energy Study Institute","organization":"environmental-and-energy-study-institute"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2017-08","source_url":"https://www.eesi.org/files/FactSheet_US_Climate_Alliance_2017.08.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The U.S. Climate Alliance, formed in June 2017, consists of 13 states and one territory committed to reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 26-28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025. This bipartisan effort is complemented by city-led initiatives like the Mayors National Climate Action Agenda and the 'We Are Still In' coalition, which includes businesses and universities. These subnational actors aim to maintain U.S. alignment with the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, despite the lack of federal mandate or funding.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The U.S. Climate Alliance is a bipartisan group of 13 states and one territory that aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 26-28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025 and meet or exceed the U.S. Clean Power Plan's target of a 32 percent reduction by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"As of 2016, the members of the U.S. Climate Alliance represent 37.7 percent of the U.S. GDP and 32.3 percent of the U.S. population, totaling over 100 million people.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Mayors National Climate Action Agenda (MNCAA), also known as Climate Mayors, represents 359 U.S. cities and 66 million Americans, including the ten most populous cities in the United States.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The U.S. Conference of Mayors passed a resolution on June 26, 2017, establishing the achievement of 100 percent renewable power as a top policy priority for the next decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'We Are Still In' coalition, formed in June 2017, includes 245 cities and counties, nine states, 324 colleges and universities, and 1,709 businesses and investors, representing $6.2 trillion in economic contributions and 120 million Americans.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational efforts to replace federal climate funding include a $15 million donation from former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to the UNFCCC and proposed state legislation allowing taxpayers to send tax rebates to the Green Climate Fund.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A coalition of 13 state attorneys general is pursuing legal action against the Trump Administration to prevent the elimination of vehicle emissions standards that would have doubled average fuel efficiency by 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eesi-000496#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Paris Agreement","carbon dioxide emissions","Clean Power Plan","renewable energy","climate finance","Green Climate Fund","greenhouse gas emissions"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","Germany","Syria","Nicaragua"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy summary","fact sheet"]}]}