{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["cites"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'cites' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=cites","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"ciel-000176","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ciel-000176","title":"Consideration of Risks and Impacts associated with Prematurely Lifting the Trade Ban for SC77","publisher":{"name":"Center for International Environmental Law","organization":"center-for-international-environmental-law"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2023-11-06","source_url":"https://www.ciel.org/reports/opening-the-rosewood-pandora-box/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A briefing by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) arguing against lifting the CITES trade suspension for Pterocarpus erinaceus (rosewood) in West and Central Africa, citing ongoing illegal trafficking and the risk of setting a dangerous precedent through 'special authorizations' and inadequate Non-Detriment Findings.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000176#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The CITES trade suspension of Pterocarpus erinaceus, in effect since March 2022, has successfully limited international trafficking and improved the conservation of the endangered rosewood species found in western and central Africa's dry savannahs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000176#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Despite the suspension, illegal logging and international trafficking continue in West Africa, and recent trade data indicates that while exports have slowed, they have not ceased entirely.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000176#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Requests for 'special authorizations' to export stocks—specifically a request from Sierra Leone for 160,000 cubic meters of P. erinaceus without a Legal Acquisition Finding or sustainable harvest quotas—and the acceptance of sub-par Non-Detriment Findings (NDFs), such as the one provided by Mali, threaten to undermine conservation efforts and encourage other countries to adopt similar unsustainable practices.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000176#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity","illegal logging","cites","trade suspension"],"geography_discussed":["Sierra Leone","Mali"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","risk assessment"]},{"id":"ciel-000377","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ciel-000377","title":"Re: Afrormosia (Pericopsis elata) from the Democratic Republic of Congo","publisher":{"name":"Center for International Environmental Law","organization":"center-for-international-environmental-law"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2014-07-07","source_url":"https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CITES_DRC_8Jul2014.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A briefing by the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and other NGOs criticizing the decision by CITES to remove Afrormosia (Pericopsis elata) from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) from the Review of Significant Trade. The document argues that the DRC has failed to implement sustainable management practices, continues to engage in widespread illegal logging, and has provided an insufficient non-detriment finding (NDF) to justify its export quotas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) suffers from systemic illegal logging and corruption, with estimates suggesting that approximately 90% of harvested timber is illegal or informal, and actual harvests are eight times higher than official figures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The DRC has consistently failed to meet CITES requirements for Afrormosia (Pericopsis elata), including failing to implement Plant Committee recommendations in 2012 to rectify non-detriment findings and establish sound harvest and export quotas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"There is significant evidence of fraudulent CITES documentation from the DRC, including a large number of fake or falsified permits identified by the CITES Secretariat in April 2014.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The non-detriment finding (NDF) submitted by the DRC in May 2014 is considered insufficient because it lacks independent verification of inventories and fails to provide a scientific basis for the export quota of 25,000 m3.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The DRC's authorized cutting permits for 2014 (55,373 m3) significantly exceed its export quota (25,000 m3), suggesting that excess Afrormosia may be exported as different species to avoid higher taxes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The authors express profound disappointment that CITES eliminated Pericopsis elata from the DRC's Review of Significant Trade in June 2014, arguing that this decision was insufficient to elicit necessary changes for sustainable management.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-000377#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["forestry","biodiversity","illegal logging","cites"],"geography_discussed":["Belgium","Germany","European Union"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Policy Analysis","Monitoring Report"]}]}