{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["carbon capture"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'carbon capture' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":4,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=carbon+capture","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"iai-000201","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iai-000201","title":"Recomendaciones para la conservación de los estuarios y restauración de los manglares de Centroamérica y Sudamérica","publisher":{"name":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research","organization":"inter-american-institute-for-global-change-research"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":"2025-01-05","source_url":"https://iai.int/es/reportes/recomendaciones-para-la-conservacion-de-los-estuarios-y-restauracion-de-los-manglares-de-centroamerica-y-sudamerica/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This white paper, based on a 2024 scientific diplomacy workshop in Panama, outlines the critical role of estuaries and mangroves in Central and South America for biodiversity, climate regulation, and coastal protection, while providing policy recommendations for their conservation and restoration.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000201#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Estuaries and mangroves in Central and South America are essential for biodiversity, coastal protection, and climate change mitigation through carbon capture, but they are currently threatened by urbanization, pollution, and climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000201#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The document proposes a comprehensive framework for public policy that includes biodiversity monitoring, water management, pollution reduction, protection of vulnerable species, investment in research, public education, inclusive governance, and cross-border cooperation involving local communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000201#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Successful sustainable management strategies are exemplified through case studies of the Gulf of Nicoya in Costa Rica and the Coiba Archipelago in Panama.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000201#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["carbon capture","coastal protection","mangroves","estuaries","biodiversity"],"geography_discussed":["Panama","Coiba Archipelago","Costa Rica","Gulf of Nicoya"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Policy recommendations"]},{"id":"sei-000901","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000901","title":"Technical solutions for climate-neutral cities","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2022-05-17","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/features/technical-solutions-for-climate-neutral-cities/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This report by the Stockholm Environment Institute outlines a framework for achieving climate-neutral cities, focusing on the identification of emission sources across three scopes and the deployment of efficiency and carbon capture technologies. It emphasizes a systems-thinking approach to urban mitigation, specifically targeting the transportation and built environment sectors while excluding large-scale electricity generation and general industry solutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Cities are critical sites for climate mitigation because they house 56% of the global population and are responsible for 71–80% of global emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Effective urban climate mitigation requires a coordinated effort among municipal governments, industry, private citizens, and financiers to understand current greenhouse gas levels, identify emission sources, set future targets, and implement strategies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Urban emissions are categorized into three scopes: Scope 1 covers direct emissions (e.g., transportation and energy generation); Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from grid-supplied energy (electricity, heat, steam, or cooling); and Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions within the value chain of goods and services.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"A review of climate plans from nine Swedish cities indicated that most prioritize Scope 1 and 2 emissions, with only some addressing Scope 3.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Mitigation strategies are classified into three categories: reducing consumption (avoiding and shifting), improving operational and manufacturing efficiency of physical assets, and carbon capture and storage.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000901#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate neutrality","urban emissions","carbon capture","energy efficiency","scope 1 2 3 emissions"],"geography_discussed":["Sweden"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["framework","technical review"]},{"id":"cer-001291","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-001291","title":"record-13.1-pg-25-36-e59adecb7c73ac32.pdf","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Record-13.1-pg-25-36.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This document is an excerpt from Eskom's Air Quality Strategy, detailing technical and financial plans for retrofitting power stations to meet Minimum Emission Standards, the potential for air quality offset projects, and the integration of water, coal quality, and climate change strategies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Eskom evaluated two retrofit scenarios to meet emission standards. The first, a comprehensive approach, requires an estimated CAPEX of R128 billion (2009 real terms) and an annual OPEX of R3.4 billion, resulting in a capacity loss of 715 MW. This scenario is deemed unachievable due to current capacity constraints, as it would require at least two units to be on outage simultaneously from 2013 onwards.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"A 'realistic scenario' for retrofits focuses on achieving particulate emissions below 50 mg/Nm³ at specific stations (Tutuka, Kriel, Matla, Lethabo, Matimba, and select units at Duvha and Grootvlei), installing low NOx burners at Majuba, Matla, Tutuka, and Kriel, and an FGD retrofit at Kendal. This scenario requires a CAPEX of R28 billion (2009 real terms), an annual OPEX of R0.4 billion, and results in a capacity loss of 160 MW.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Eskom proposes 'offset projects' as a more cost-effective alternative to retrofitting pollution abatement technology. For example, the document suggests that the R10 billion capital cost of installing FGD on a 6 by 600 MW power station could instead electrify 1.25 million homes, which would reduce pollution concentrations where people's exposure is highest.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The installation of Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) technology is constrained by water availability. FGD approximately triples the water consumption of a dry-cooled power station, and a water supply deficit in the Integrated Vaal River System (IVRS) between 2013 and 2020 means retrofitting stations with FGD may only be possible after 2020.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Eskom's climate change strategy includes a six-point plan focusing on adaptation, diversification of generation mix, energy efficiency, innovation, carbon market investment, and advocacy. The document notes that while FGD reduces SO2, it increases CO2 emissions by reducing efficiency and producing CO2 as a by-product.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Eskom aims to install continuous CO2 emission monitors on all units or stacks of all coal-fired power stations by the end of 2013. Additionally, the company plans to compile mercury and heavy metal (lead, antimony, and arsenic) emissions inventories to assess the need for further abatement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-001291#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","air quality","carbon capture","greenhouse gas emissions","coal-fired power plants"],"geography_discussed":["Highveld","Vaal River","Waterberg"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["technical_assessment","financial_projection","policy_strategy"]},{"id":"foei-000038","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000038","title":"NO ES CERO: Cómo las metas de emisiones “cero neto” encubren la inacción frente al cambio climático","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"es","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/es/publicaciones/no-es-cero-inaccion-cambio-climatico-informe/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A technical report by a coalition of climate justice organizations arguing that \"net zero\" targets are used by governments and polluting corporations to mask inaction, avoid responsibility, and potentially increase fossil fuel emissions through the use of distant goals and unproven technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The term \"net zero\" is utilized by major polluting companies and governments as a facade to avoid responsibility and hide inaction or harmful activities regarding climate change. The report asserts that \"net zero emissions\" is not equivalent to \"zero emissions.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Net zero plans often rely on carbon removal technologies and tree plantations, such as Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), but the planet lacks sufficient land to support these projects at the scale proposed by governments and corporations. This reliance allows greenhouse gas emissions to continue increasing while waiting for future carbon removal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The report characterizes many net zero targets as a form of \"carbon colonialism\" because they shift the burden of carbon capture to lands and plantations in the Global South, despite those regions contributing little to the climate crisis. Furthermore, targets set for distant dates, such as 2050, are described as insufficient and too late.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000038#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["net zero","carbon capture","beccs","carbon colonialism","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Global South"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy critique"]}]}