{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"climate_tags":["adaptive management"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'adaptive management' for facet 'climate_tags' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?climate_tags=adaptive+management","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"glorespar-000086","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/glorespar-000086","title":"GLOBAL RESILIENCE PARTNERSHIP MONITORING EVALUATION AND LEARNING (MEL) PLAN 2024-2029","publisher":{"name":"Global Resilience Partnership","organization":"global-resilience-partnership"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2025-07","source_url":"https://www.globalresiliencepartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/grp-mel-plan-2024-2029_july-2025.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Global Resilience Partnership (GRP) Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) Plan 2024-2029 outlines the framework for tracking progress, capturing lessons, and assessing the impact of its resilience initiatives. The plan emphasizes an adaptive management approach and a 'Triple Loop Learning' system to improve resilience outcomes in the Global South, focusing on food, finance, and communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The GRP has set specific impact targets for 2030, aiming to support 15 million people and leverage $100 million in resilience initiatives and programmes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"For the 2024-2027 period, GRP has established several programme indicator targets, including leveraging US$25m, supporting five million people, identifying 150 initiatives, and supporting 100 urban labs in informal settlements led by women’s collectives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"GRP employs a tiered reporting and evaluation requirement based on grant size: 'Idea stage grants' (under US$50,000) require an MEL approach overview; 'Seed grants' (up to US$250,000) require a standalone MEL plan; and 'Scale grants' (from US$250,000 or specifically those >USD 1m) must conduct counterfactual impact assessments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The GRP utilizes a 'Triple Loop Learning' framework to categorize learning objectives: 'Single Loop' focuses on programme improvement (doing things right), 'Double Loop' focuses on organisational strategy and course corrections (doing the right things), and 'Triple Loop' focuses on critical reflection and sense-making regarding the processes of increasing resilience (deciding what is right).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The MEL framework mandates the collection of data disaggregated by gender for all relevant indicators to assess the distinct effects of interventions on men and women and to advance women's participation as decision makers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"GRP prioritizes efforts in Official Development Assistance (ODA) eligible countries vulnerable to climate change, specifically highlighting sub-Saharan Africa, South & South East Asia, and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) in the Pacific and Caribbean.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glorespar-000086#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["climate resilience","adaptive management","global south","gender-responsive solutions","impact assessment"],"geography_discussed":["sub-Saharan Africa","South Asia","Southeast Asia","Pacific","Caribbean"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["monitoring and evaluation plan","strategic framework"]},{"id":"sei-000844","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000844","title":"Integrating flood risk reduction, river basin and resilience management in planning: a case study of Kristianstad, Sweden","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"case study","language":"en","date_published":"2015-02-20","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/integrating-flood-risk-reduction-river-basin-and-resilience-management-in-planning-a-case-study-of-kristianstad-sweden/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This case study, part of the Baltic COMPASS project, analyzes flood risk and river basin management in Kristianstad, Sweden, identifying significant barriers to adaptive river management, including a lack of cross-sectoral integration and the absence of a river basin-wide governance structure for water flows.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000844#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Flood risk management in Kristianstad is overly narrow, focusing on urban flood control while ignoring flood abatement within the river basin or downstream alleviation. This is driven by a lack of synergy and integration across sectors such as urban planning, environmental planning, agriculture, and forestry.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000844#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Effective management is obstructed by the municipality's limited mandate, which ends at its borders, and the lack of a governance structure for the river basin that addresses water flows and floods (current structures focus only on water quality). Consequently, there is no coordinated investment in flood-retaining activities, such as catchment rehabilitation or farmer compensation for land use to reduce flood peaks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000844#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Legal instruments for managing water flows, specifically those involving joint property societies, are outdated and inflexible. While there is potential for synergy between the EU Flood Directive and the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD), practical implementation remains unclear, although local dialogue in Kristianstad is improving alignment between urban planners and risk managers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000844#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["flood risk management","river basin management","adaptive management","ecosystem services","climate change"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study"]}]}