{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["topic modelling"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'topic modelling' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":4,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=topic+modelling","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"isdglo-000114","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000114","title":"The German Far Right Online","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Longitudinal_Study_Matlach_Hammer.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes the online behavior of the German far right, finding that while they utilize 'alt-tech' platforms to evade moderation, they remain heavily reliant on very large online platforms (VLOPs) for reach. It highlights the central role of conspiracy theories, the opportunistic use of crises like COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine, and the increasing importance of audiovisual content.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Conspiracy theories function as a primary heuristic for far-right online subcultures, framing their worldview as being besieged by \"dark forces\" and offering solutions of either individual preparation or collective revolution.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Telegram serves a dual purpose for the German far right: it is used for internal ideological learning and networking among believers, and as a tool for external propaganda aimed at the wider public using a more moderate tone.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Far-right actors opportunistically exploit current events and crises to spread ideology, specifically using the COVID-19 pandemic to align with the anti-lockdown movement and the Russian invasion of Ukraine to disseminate Russian state propaganda.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite the use of alternative platforms, very large online platforms (VLOPs) remain critical for far-right audiences, with accounts on these platforms expanding their followership and engagement over the study period.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The far-right online ecosystem is characterized by platform-specific silos, where a high volume of shared URLs link back to the same platform (Facebook, X/Twitter, or Telegram) rather than external domains.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant trend toward audiovisual content, with video-sharing platforms making up the largest proportion of shared social media links; Odysee emerged as a primary alternative to YouTube.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The takeover of X/Twitter by Elon Musk in late 2022 coincided with a steep increase in followers for far-right accounts, suggesting that relaxed moderation policies made the platform more attractive again.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-feminist narratives, including transphobia and opposition to abortion rights, have increased, often mirroring US far-right discourse and spiking after the US Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson ruling.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Racist and xenophobic discourse remains structural, with a focus on anti-migration sentiment and the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy, often framing migrants as a threat to German resources or security.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The far right utilizes 'lifestyle' topics—such as nutrition, survivalism, and holistic health—as a 'coded' strategy to appeal to broader audiences and build community while avoiding overt ideological markers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000114#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","renewable energy","nuclear power","environmental policy"],"geography_discussed":["World","United States","Russia","Hungary","Brazil"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["longitudinal study","content analysis","topic modelling","network analysis"]},{"id":"isdglo-000055","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000055","title":"A SNAPSHOT OF FAR-RIGHT ACTIVITY ON GAB IN AUSTRALIA","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2021-05","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/A-Snapshot-of-Far-Right-Activity-on-Gab-in-Australia_final.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyses a network of 40 geolocated Australian Gab accounts, finding that the platform serves as a hub for antisemitism, white supremacy, and COVID-19 disinformation. Activity spiked between June and August 2020, coinciding with global Black Lives Matter protests and Melbourne lockdowns. A small number of highly active accounts drove the majority of content, often promoting conspiracy theories about a 'Marxist' infiltration of Western institutions and calling for white separatism or violence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Far-right activity on Gab in Australia saw a significant increase between June and August 2020, with monthly posts exceeding 7,500, representing a 90% increase over May. This surge coincided with the second COVID-19 lockdown in Melbourne and global racial justice protests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Mobilisation on the platform is heavily concentrated among a few users; the top three most active accounts produced 34,597 posts, which is 75% of the total 45,404 posts in the study's dataset.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Antisemitism is a prominent feature of the network, with over 11% of all posts containing explicitly antisemitic terms and slurs, including direct calls for violence against Jewish people and their removal from Australian society.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Australian far-right used the COVID-19 pandemic to advance their ideology, focusing on pandemic denial, promoting fake cures like hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and using lockdown restrictions in Victoria to fuel anti-Chinese sentiment and anti-minority hate.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Discussions regarding Black Lives Matter (BLM) were uniformly negative, with users describing the movement as 'Marxist', alleging it was manipulated by global elites such as George Soros, or claiming it was a front for 'anti-white racism'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The network promotes white supremacist and ethnonationalist ideologies, including the 'white genocide' conspiracy theory. Some users discussed tactics to mainstream these views by framing them as 'Christian values' to avoid being labelled as racists.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Far-right users frequently frame the far-left as an existential threat, alleging a 'Marxist-socialist or communist plot' to infiltrate Australian media, schools, and universities to destroy Western civilisation. This narrative is used to justify calls for white separatism or violence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Content related to energy and climate change was overwhelmingly opposed to green energy, with users claiming wind and solar power are inefficient or corrupt and advocating for the use of coal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000055#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","fossil fuel","climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":["Victoria","Melbourne","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["social media analysis","qualitative analysis","quantitative analysis","topic modelling"]},{"id":"isdglo-000156","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000156","title":"THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN AUSTRALIA’S POLITICAL FRINGES ON THE RIGHT AND LEFT","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2020-11","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The-Interplay-Between-Australia_final-1.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyses the Facebook activity of 43 far-right and 31 far-left pages, and 9 public groups in Australia during the first seven months of 2020. It finds that while both sides use 'us versus them' narratives, opposition to the far-right is more central to far-left identity than vice versa. The COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement served as primary catalysts for activity, with the far-right weaponising the pandemic to promote anti-China and xenophobic narratives, while the far-left focused on labour rights and police violence. The study notes that far-right groups were more likely to promote violence against the left than the far-left was against the right.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Opposition to the far-right is more central to the identity and online activity of the far-left than opposition to the far-left is to the far-right. Discussion about the far-right accounted for 17% of far-left page output, whereas discussion about the far-left made up only 7% of far-right output.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The COVID-19 pandemic was a primary driver of activity for both groups, but with opposing ideological focuses: the far-right used the virus to promote hostility toward China and support border closures, while the far-left focused on the pandemic's impact on the economy and workers' rights.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement triggered a sharp increase in antagonistic online mobilisation in June 2020. Far-right groups attempted to discredit the movement as violent, while far-left groups used it to highlight police brutality against minorities in Australia and internationally.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Far-right narratives regarding the far-left often employ interchangeable labels such as 'communist', 'socialist', 'Marxist', or 'Antifa' as generic descriptors for any political opponent. These groups also portray mainstream media and institutions like universities as complicit in 'Marxist indoctrination'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Far-right groups demonstrated a higher propensity to promote violence against their political opponents compared to far-left groups. Analysis identified numerous calls for violence in far-right comment sections, including threats to 'shoot first' or 'burn' individuals, while calls for violence from the far-left were described as 'very rare'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A small number of highly active pages and groups drive the majority of the reciprocal antagonistic content. For example, one single group was responsible for 67% of all far-right group posts concerning the far-left.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000156#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["United States","People's Republic of China","London","Melbourne","Footscray"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["social media analysis","topic modelling","qualitative content analysis"]},{"id":"caad-000038","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/caad-000038","title":"Extreme Weather, Extreme Content: How Big Tech Enables Climate Disinformation In a World on the Brink","publisher":{"name":"Climate Action Against Disinformation","organization":"climate-action-against-disinformation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://caad.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CAAD-Pre-COP-Report-2024.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report details the persistence of climate disinformation across major platforms like X, Meta, TikTok, and YouTube. It identifies key narratives used to discredit renewable energy, the use of extreme weather events (wildfires and hurricanes) to fuel conspiracy theories and incite violence, and the extensive use of Meta's advertising tools by fossil fuel entities for greenwashing and lobbying. The authors argue that platform architectures reward engagement over truth, necessitating systemic policy changes to disrupt the economy of disinformation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate disinformation attacking renewable energy—specifically wind, solar, and electric vehicles (EVs)—remains remarkably consistent over time, often recycling debunked talking points that claim these technologies are inefficient, dangerous, or prohibitively expensive.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-climate actors use 'woke-washing' by co-opting legitimate human rights concerns, such as child labour in cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), to discredit the energy transition and renewables writ large.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A small number of 'super-spreader' accounts drive significant spikes in anti-climate activity; for example, the account Wide Awake Media grew from 322 followers in March 2023 to over 578,000 by November 2024.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Extreme weather events are weaponised to decouple disasters from climate change, with viral narratives attributing wildfires to arson or 'Direct Energy Weapons' (DEW) and hurricanes to geo-engineering for 'land grabs'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Misinformation following Hurricanes Helene and Milton on TikTok led to credible threats of violence against FEMA personnel, with some sponsored posts describing officials as 'enemies of the State' who could be 'shot or hung on sight'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Between 24 October 2023 and 24 October 2024, eight fossil fuel entities spent between $14.05 million and $17.62 million on Meta advertising, generating approximately 700 million impressions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Fossil fuel advertising on Meta primarily focuses on three pillars: greenwashing (e.g., pushing Carbon Capture and Storage), presenting fossil fuels as essential for energy security, and lobbying against environmental policies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Industry front groups are among the highest spenders on Meta; Energy Citizens spent between $5.9 million and $7.3 million, which exceeded the combined spending of the four tracked fossil fuel companies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Researcher access to platform data has severely declined, with Meta's deprecation of Crowdtangle and X's prohibitively expensive API pricing hindering the ability to track macro-level climate disinformation trends.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000038#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","renewable energy","wind power","solar energy","electric vehicle","greenwashing","carbon capture and storage","extreme weather event","wildfire","hurricane","climate finance","energy transition"],"geography_discussed":["United States","United Kingdom","Canada","Australia","Democratic Republic of the Congo","North Carolina","Tennessee","Hawaii","The Hague"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","quantitative analysis","topic modelling","narrative analysis"]}]}