{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["tool manual"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'tool manual' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=tool+manual","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"wwf-000494","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wwf-000494","title":"BIOGENIC CARBON FOOTPRINT CALCULATOR FOR HARVESTED WOOD PRODUCTS USER MANUAL","publisher":{"name":"WWF International","organization":"wwf-international"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2020-07","source_url":"https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/432/4f39kysq67_Biogenic_Carbon_Footprint_Calculator_User_Manual_July2020_Quantis.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The manual describes a tool for calculating the biogenic carbon footprint of wood-based products, measured in kg CO2eq. It explains two usage levels: a 'BASIC' mode for quick checks and an 'ADVANCED' mode for detailed analysis of up to 10 products. The calculator incorporates dynamic methods to assess the 'forest carbon gap' (the time until harvested biomass is regrown) and 'storage time benefits' (delayed emissions). It provides reference values for various forest species and climate zones based on IPCC 2006 classifications, as well as default lifespans for product categories ranging from energy combustion (0 years) to building materials (50 years). The tool also allows for the customization of wood processing efficiency, allocation methods, and end-of-life scenarios such as incineration, recycling, and landfill.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The biogenic carbon footprint is calculated by adding the amount of biogenic CO2 emissions multiplied by the GWPbio (Global Warming Potential bio) to the conventional carbon footprint.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The calculator uses a dynamic approach to account for the 'forest carbon gap,' which is the period from when a tree is harvested until the emissions are matched by regrowth, considering carbon pools including above-ground biomass (AGB), below-ground biomass (BGB), dead organic matter (DOM), and soil organic carbon (SOC).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The tool provides default carbon storage lifetimes based on product categories, such as 50 years for building materials, 16 years for furnishing and other building materials, and 1 year for packing materials and short-life paper products.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The calculator's forest biomass source parameters are based on IPCC 2006 classifications for climate zones and include 36 specific climate/species combinations, such as Boreal Norway Spruce and Tropical moist/wet Bamboo.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"End-of-life treatments are modeled with different assumptions: incineration assumes immediate release, recycling assumes no benefits beyond the product lifespan, and landfills involve a decay process where a non-degradable pool is permanently sequestered.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The tool allows for different wood extraction allocation methods, including a default mass balance approach, economic allocation based on ecoinvent v3.5, and a cut-off approach for recycled or waste biomass where no extraction burden is assigned.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000494#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon footprint","carbon sequestration","carbon capture and storage","life cycle assessment","biomass"],"geography_discussed":["Canada"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological guide","tool manual"]},{"id":"iisd-002507","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-002507","title":"Outil de planification pour l’adaptation, les moyens de subsistance et les écosystèmes","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"guide","language":"fr","date_published":"2018","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/alive-tool-manual-french.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The ALivE tool guides users through a three-phase process: collecting data on livelihoods and ecosystems, analyzing risks and prioritizing EbA options, and integrating these options into policy and planning. It emphasizes a participatory approach, gender sensitivity, and adaptive management to ensure sustainable climate resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The ALivE tool is structured into three modules and five progressive steps: understanding the context, analyzing risks for ecosystems and livelihoods, identifying and prioritizing EbA options, designing project activities, and identifying monitoring and evaluation (M&E) elements.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Ecosystem-based adaptation (EbA) is defined as the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services to help people adapt to the adverse effects of climate change, involving sustainable management, conservation, and restoration of ecosystems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Effective EbA requires the integration of climate information, a participatory community-led approach, gender considerations, adaptive management principles, and multi-level governance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The tool employs a multi-criteria analysis to prioritize EbA options based on five effectiveness criteria: risk reduction potential, adaptive capacity improvement, benefits for vulnerable groups/gender equality, sustainable use of biodiversity, and ecosystem resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"EbA options are further filtered by feasibility using at least four criteria from a default list, which includes affordable cost, technical feasibility, political feasibility, maintenance cost, monitorability, flexibility, number of beneficiaries, and cultural appropriateness.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The manual identifies specific EbA options across different ecosystems, such as mangrove restoration for coastal protection, agroforestry to reduce crop damage from extreme temperatures, and sustainable grassland management for pastoralist resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To ensure long-term sustainability and scaling, EbA must be integrated into existing policies and planning processes, such as National Adaptation Plans (NAPs), which provide strategic opportunities for funding and institutionalization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The tool advocates for adaptive management, an iterative process of planning, implementing, monitoring, and adjusting actions based on observed impacts to reduce uncertainty associated with climate variability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002507#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["ecosystem-based adaptation","climate resilience","biodiversity","ecosystem service","Climate risk assessment","national adaptation plan","Community based adaptation","nature-based solutions","Mangrove restoration","agroforestry","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","Canada"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["guide","methodology","tool manual"]}]}