{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["systematic review protocol"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'systematic review protocol' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=systematic+review+protocol","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-000616","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000616","title":"Effectiveness of climate change adaptation interventions in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact of funding modalities: a mixed methods systematic review protocol","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2021-10-07","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/effectiveness-of-climate-change-adaptation-interventions-in-sub-saharan-africa-and-the-impact-of-funding-modalities-a-mixed-methods-systematic-review-protocol/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"This document is a research protocol outlining a methodological plan for a mixed methods systematic review. The review intends to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptation finance in sub-Saharan Africa by synthesizing academic and grey literature to determine how project characteristics and funding modalities influence adaptation outcomes, specifically regarding climate change risk and vulnerability.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000616#summary","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The protocol identifies a lack of a standardized metric for measuring the effectiveness of adaptation finance, contrasting it with mitigation finance, which uses greenhouse gas emission reduction per unit of funding as a common metric.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000616#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"Current assessments of adaptation finance effectiveness are divided between focusing on procedural funding modality aspects, such as allocation equity, and the results produced by specific adaptation activities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000616#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-08-17"},{"text":"The proposed systematic review aims to bridge the gap between procedural and result-based assessments by analyzing how adaptation project characteristics and their financing in sub-Saharan Africa affect outcomes related to climate change vulnerability and risk.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000616#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-08-17"}],"climate_tags":["adaptation finance","climate change adaptation","sub-saharan africa","vulnerability","risk"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["Systematic review protocol"]},{"id":"sei-002562","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002562","title":"Effectiveness of climate change adaptation interventions in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact of funding modalities","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2021-10","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/sei-mixed-methods-systematic-review-protocol.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document outlines a methodological plan to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptation finance in sub-Saharan Africa, specifically focusing on projects funded by multilateral climate funds and bilateral donors from the UK and Sweden. It proposes a theory of change to link financial inputs and project design to outcomes such as reduced climate risk and vulnerability. The protocol details a multi-pronged search strategy across academic and grey literature, and a synthesis approach combining meta-analysis, framework synthesis, and qualitative comparative analysis. However, the authors note that funding for the review was discontinued in March 2021, and the review will not be completed as described.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"There is a significant gap in adaptation finance for Africa; while costs are estimated between US$7–15 billion per year by 2020 and up to US$50 billion per year by 2050, actual flows have only been US$1–2 billion per year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document identifies a synthesis gap in climate action research, noting that existing reviews often focus on either adaptation activities without financial analysis, or on finance allocation without assessing on-the-ground outcomes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed review focuses on a specific set of funders: multilateral climate funds—the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF), the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), the Adaptation Fund (AF), and the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR)—and bilateral donors from the United Kingdom (FCDO) and Sweden (Sida).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The review's theoretical framework defines an effective adaptation project as one providing evidence of the reduction of climate change risks, which are the result of the interaction between vulnerability, exposure, and hazard.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The protocol establishes a mixed-methods synthesis approach to answer five research questions regarding design differences between funders, effects on climate risks, causal pathways to outcomes, and the association of financial and implementation conditions with those outcomes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The review was designed to include projects implemented after 2010, coinciding with the introduction of the Rio marker for adaptation, which allows donors to identify if adaptation is a principal or significant objective.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors explicitly state that the review will not be completed as described because funding from the UK Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning was suspended in March 2021.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002562#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["adaptation finace","climate finance","climate resilience","climate change vulnerability","climate risk","maladaptation"],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","Sweden","Kenya","Tanzania","Uganda","Rwanda"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["systematic review protocol","mixed methods"]}]}