{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["systematic analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'systematic analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=systematic+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"wri-000530","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-000530","title":"Did the Global COVID-19 Recovery Address Climate Adaptation and Resilience? An Analysis of Sixty-Seven Countries","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.wri.org/research/global-covid-19-recovery-address-climate-resilience-analysis","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research analyzes the integration of climate adaptation and resilience within COVID-19 recovery measures across sixty-seven countries, highlighting a gap in recovery efforts for the most vulnerable nations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000530#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The study identifies a paradox where the poorest and most vulnerable countries in the sample were the least likely to incorporate climate adaptation into their COVID-19 recovery strategies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000530#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While previous analyses of COVID-19 recoveries have focused on 'green' or mitigation elements, there has been a lack of systematic analysis regarding the integration of climate adaptation and resilience.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000530#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change adaptation","climate resilience","Paris Agreement"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["systematic analysis"]},{"id":"wri-000991","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-000991","title":"Food Loss and Waste in India: The Knowns and The Unknowns","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.wri.org/research/food-loss-and-waste-india-knowns-and-unknowns","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The paper examines food loss and waste in India, noting that post-harvest losses were valued at INR 926.51 billion in 2014. It identifies a lack of standardized measurement metrics and a scarcity of empirical research on household-level food waste and the social, economic, and environmental impacts of food loss. The authors recommend adopting the global Food Loss and Waste Accounting and Reporting Standard and establishing a multi-stakeholder action coalition to prioritize research and policy implementation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000991#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The economic value of post-harvest losses in India was estimated at INR 926.51 billion (USD 15.19 billion) in 2014, though this figure is considered an underestimation of the total food loss and waste in the country.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000991#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Current research in India focuses primarily on the quantity of post-harvest loss, while empirical data on food waste—particularly at the household level—is almost nonexistent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000991#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Existing data on food losses lack comparability because of differing measurement metrics, and there is a significant lack of research regarding the social, economic, environmental, and gender-disaggregated impacts of food loss and waste.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000991#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To improve decision-making and data comparability, the paper recommends that India adopt a standard metric, specifically suggesting the global Food Loss and Waste Accounting and Reporting Standard developed by the FLW Protocol.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-000991#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["greenhouse gas emissions","food system","water resource","food security"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["systematic analysis","literature review"]}]}