{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["screening assessment"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'screening assessment' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=screening+assessment","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"cdkn-000043","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cdkn-000043","title":"Identifying opportunities for climate-smart agriculture investments in Africa","publisher":{"name":"Climate and Development Knowledge Network","organization":"climate-and-development-knowledge-network"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2012-02-11","source_url":"https://cdkn.org/resource/identifying-opportunities-for-climate-smart-agriculture-investments-in-africa","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines how National Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plans (NAFSIPs) in 14 African countries can be leveraged for climate-smart agriculture. Using a rapid screening methodology, the study finds that approximately 60% of planned activities in these plans address slow-onset climate change, while 18% address extreme events and 19% focus on mitigation. The paper concludes that all reviewed NAFSIPs have potential for both extreme event adaptation and climate mitigation, and recommends further analysis of cost-effectiveness, financing sources, and the integration of innovative climate financing mechanisms to transform these plans into climate-smart interventions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000043#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The application of the screening methodology to NAFSIPs revealed that roughly 60% of planned activities are expected to provide benefits for slow-onset climate change, 18% for adaptation to extreme events, and 19% for climate change mitigation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000043#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Every NAFSIP reviewed demonstrated potential for both the mitigation of climate change and adaptation to extreme climatic events.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000043#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Among the 14 countries screened, 11 have National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000043#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Climate-smart agriculture","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","food security","Sustainable land management","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Benin","Ethiopia","The Gambia","Ghana","Kenya","Liberia","Malawi","Niger","Nigeria","Rwanda","Senegal","Sierra Leone","Togo","Uganda"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological proposal","screening assessment"]}]}