{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["scorecard assessment"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'scorecard assessment' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=scorecard+assessment","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"ucs-001156","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ucs-001156","title":"Cattle, Cleared Forests, and Climate","publisher":{"name":"Union of Concerned Scientists","organization":"union-of-concerned-scientists"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2016-09","source_url":"https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/attach/2016/09/ucs-beef-scorecard-company-scores-2016.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Union of Concerned Scientists evaluated several global beef buyers using a 100-point scorecard to measure their efforts to eliminate deforestation from their supply chains. The assessment focused on five categories: ambition of commitments, time-bound implementation plans, compliance protocols, transparency, and traceability/verification. Results varied significantly, with Walmart achieving the highest score of 52, followed by McDonald's at 48 and Mars at 37. Several companies, including Burger King, Pizza Hut, Kroger, and Conagra, received a total score of 0, indicating a lack of documented commitments or practices meeting the scorecard's criteria.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Walmart received the highest overall score of 52 out of 100 among the evaluated companies. It achieved a perfect score of 11 in its time-bound implementation plan, stating it \"achieved our goal that we would source beef that is free of Amazon deforestation by the end of 2015.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"McDonald's scored 48 out of 100, with a strong score in the ambition of its deforestation-free commitment (16 points). The company maintains a policy \"prohibiting the sourcing of beef from within the Amazon Biome\" and intends to achieve its broader priority product commitments \"before 2030\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Mars scored 37 out of 100, with its highest points in the time-bound implementation plan (10 points). Mars committed to ensuring that by the end of 2017, it would \"only source from suppliers who are able to demonstrate that beef coming from the Amazon Biome area isn’t from cattle associated with primary forest clearing\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several major beef buyers received a total score of 0, indicating they failed to meet the criteria across all categories. These companies include Burger King, Pizza Hut, Kroger, and Conagra.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Safeway scored 27 out of 100, with points primarily awarded for traceability and monitoring (22 points) and transparency (5 points) based on its confirmation that it sources \"South American beef from a signatory to the Cattle Agreement.\"","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Hormel and Wendy's both received a total score of 22. Both companies earned points in the traceability, monitoring, and verification category (22 points) by utilizing suppliers that use \"satellite images and geo-referenced maps of farms\" (Hormel) or a \"monitoring system that uses satellite images\" (Wendy's).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Nestlé scored 23 out of 100, with the majority of its points coming from the ambition of its commitment (18 points), which includes a goal of \"no sourcing from areas converted from natural forests after 1 February 2013\". However, it received 0 points for its implementation plan because it \"have not set a time frame for this\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Jack Link's scored 16 out of 100, with all points coming from traceability, monitoring, and verification. The company stated that all its suppliers have \"adopted the Minimum Criteria for Industrial Scale Cattle Operations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome (a.k.a. the Cattle Agreement, G4 Agreement)\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subway received a total score of 5, with points awarded only for transparency. The company provided a list of cattle product sources including Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, Uruguay, and Central America.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ucs-001156#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["deforestation","forest conservation"],"geography_discussed":["Argentina","Chile","Mexico","Colombia","Peru","Ecuador","Uruguay","Central America","Canada","Japan"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate benchmarking","scorecard assessment"]}]}