{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["resource tracking"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'resource tracking' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=resource+tracking","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"clipolin-000256","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000256","title":"Following the Money: Financing Bioeconomy in Brazil","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-09-12","source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/following-the-money-financing-bioeconomy-in-brazil/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Between 2021 and 2023, bioeconomy finance in Brazil averaged US$ 3.213 billion per year, heavily concentrated in planted forests and bioenergy. While private domestic sources provided 69% of funding, biodiversity-based products and the Northern region remain significantly underfunded compared to industrial crops and other regions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Bioeconomy finance in Brazil averaged US$ 3.213 billion per year from 2021 to 2023, with 74% of these funds (US$ 2.391 billion/year) concentrated in the planted forest and bioenergy and biofuels sectors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The planted forest sector received 40% of total finance (US$ 1.289 billion/year), primarily focusing on eucalyptus; a single company, Suzano, accounted for 71% of this amount through thematic bonds and a BNDES investment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Bioenergy and biofuels received 34% of finance (US$ 1.101 billion/year), with 87% of this funding coming from thematic bonds and Decarbonization Credits (CBIOs).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Domestic sources provided 96% of bioeconomy finance (US$ 3.102 billion/year), with private sources contributing 69% (US$ 2.196 billion/year). International sources made up 4% (US$ 0.111 billion/year), primarily from Germany (43%) and Norway (34%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Thematic bonds were the primary financial instrument, raising US$ 1.198 billion/year (38%), but were used exclusively for bioenergy, biofuels, and planted forests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Finance for biodiversity products is extremely low compared to industrial crops; while soy received US$ 16.4 billion/year via rural credit, biodiversity products received only US$ 0.3 billion/year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Geographic distribution of biodiversity product finance is skewed; the Southern region received 30% and the Northeast 26%, while the Northern region—critical for sustainable development—received only 12%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000256#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biobased economy","climate finance","biofuel","bioenergy"],"geography_discussed":["Germany","Norway","Southern region","Northeast Region","Southeast Region","Northern region","Center West","Paraná","Bahia","São Paulo"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["financial flow analysis","resource tracking"]}]}