{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["resource mapping"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'resource mapping' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":6,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=resource+mapping","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"catf-000398","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/catf-000398","title":"Federal Funding Programs for Clean Energy Deployment: A Guide for States","publisher":{"name":"Clean Air Task Force","organization":"clean-air-task-force"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2024-12-03","source_url":"https://www.catf.us/resource/federal-funding-programs-clean-energy-deployment/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document outlines a three-phase framework for states to maximize federal clean energy funding: Identification, Collaboration, and Implementation. It details a wide array of available federal grants, loans, and tax credits across generation, transmission, energy efficiency, and workforce development, emphasizing the role of the DOE, EPA, and USDA in supporting the transition to a clean power system.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The U.S. power sector is the largest stationary source of greenhouse gases, accounting for approximately one-third of national emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A significant portion of federal clean energy funding is directed toward the power sector, with over 40% of the estimated $390 billion in IRA tax credits projected for this sector.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"States can utilize a three-phase approach to optimize federal funding: Phase I (Identification) involves establishing priorities and principals; Phase II (Collaboration) focuses on interagency coordination and stakeholder communication; and Phase III (Implementation) covers securing matches and direct funding.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several technology-neutral tax credits are available for clean electricity, including the 45Y Production Tax Credit and the 48E Investment Tax Credit, both of which offer bonuses for meeting prevailing wage, apprenticeship, and domestic content requirements.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Federal support for grid modernization includes the GRIP Program, which offers billions in grants for grid resilience, innovation, and smart grid projects to facilitate the integration of electrified buildings and clean energy generation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) has allocated $27 billion to mobilize private capital, including $7 billion specifically for residential solar grants through the Solar for All program.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"States can establish State Energy Finance Institutions (SEFIs) in partnership with the DOE’s Loan Program Office to access concessionary loan rates and reduce deployment barriers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"catf-000398#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable electricity","electric power industry","climate finance","Inflation Reduction Act of 2022","tax credit","Resilience (power system)","energy efficiency","carbon capture and storage","nuclear power","solar energy","geothermal energy","energy storage","workforce development","environmental justice","electric vehicle"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy guide","resource mapping"]},{"id":"eninnova-000067","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/eninnova-000067","title":"THE COAL COST CROSSOVER: ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF EXISTING COAL COMPARED TO NEW LOCAL WIND AND SOLAR RESOURCES","publisher":{"name":"Energy Innovation","organization":"energy-innovation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2019-03","source_url":"https://energyinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/Coal-Cost-Crossover_Energy-Innovation_VCE_FINAL2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that a significant portion of the U.S. coal fleet is now more expensive to operate than replacing it with new local wind and solar power. In 2018, 74% of the fleet was 'at risk' of being undercut by renewables, a figure projected to rise to 86% by 2025. The analysis emphasizes that these findings are conservative because they only consider resources within 35 miles of existing plants and do not account for broader transmission expansion or combined energy portfolios.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"In 2018, approximately 74 percent of the U.S. coal fleet, totaling 211 gigawatts (GW), was 'at risk', meaning local wind or solar could provide the same amount of electricity more cheaply. This figure is projected to increase to 86 percent of the fleet, or 246 GW, by 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A subset of the fleet is 'substantially at risk', where local renewables can undercut coal's ongoing costs by at least 25 percent. In 2018, this applied to 94 GW of capacity, increasing to 140 GW—nearly half the U.S. fleet—by 2025, even with the phase-out of federal tax credits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis identifies strong regional trends: almost all coal plants in the PJM footprint are projected to be at risk by 2025, and nearly all coal plants in the Southeast are substantially at risk of replacement by local solar by 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The cost of operating existing coal plants (MCOE) generally ranges from $33 to $111 per megawatt-hour (MWh). In comparison, 2018 costs for solar were between $28 and $52 per MWh, while wind costs ranged from $13 to $88 per MWh.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report notes that the potential stranded asset value of at-risk coal plants is estimated to be in the tens of billions of dollars.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"eninnova-000067#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","wind power","photovoltaics","Levelized cost of energy","energy transition","stranded asset","electric power transmission","battery energy storage system","demand response","virtual power plant"],"geography_discussed":["Colorado","Texas","Indiana","Minnesota"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["economic analysis","comparative cost assessment","resource mapping"]},{"id":"greenca-000050","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/greenca-000050","title":"Opportunities for value addition to selected Western Cape organic waste streams","publisher":{"name":"GreenCape","organization":"greencape"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2017-07","source_url":"https://greencape.co.za/assets/Uploads/BioValSA-Livestock-Opp.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies significant volumes of organic waste from dairies, piggeries, poultry farms, and abattoirs in the Western Cape, noting that most are currently underutilised or disposed of via landfill and burial. It highlights anaerobic digestion and composting as primary value-addition opportunities, while noting regulatory hurdles regarding fertiliser sales and strict landfill requirements for animal carcasses. The document provides a directory of waste providers and technology partners to facilitate business-matching.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Annual manure production in the Western Cape is estimated at 370,000 tonnes from poultry, 170,000 tonnes from piggeries, and between 6,000,000 and 10,000,000 tonnes from cattle.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Abattoir waste generation in the Western Cape includes approximately 24,000 tonnes of red meat waste per annum (22,000 tonnes of by-products and 2,000 tonnes of waste) and 75,000 tonnes of poultry waste from condemned slaughters.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Over 60% of sampled abattoirs in the Western Cape do not add value to their waste, instead relying on on-farm burial or waste disposal facilities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anaerobic digestion is considered an infant industry in South Africa, with adoption slowed by a lack of technical skills, complex business cases for variable feedstocks, and limited awareness.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regulatory restrictions on the sale of packaged compost as fertiliser lead many producers to sell their product as unpackaged 'mulch' to avoid the need for registration and authorization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Strict national regulations require non-infectious animal carcasses to be disposed of at specific Class B or G:L:B+ waste disposal facilities; currently, Vissershok is the only landfill in the Western Cape meeting these requirements, making transport costs prohibitive for many.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"greenca-000050#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biogas","organic waste","biofuel","circular economy","fertilizer","waste management"],"geography_discussed":["South Africa","Gauteng","KwaZulu-Natal","Eastern Cape"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["opportunity assessment","SWOT analysis","resource mapping"]},{"id":"cdkn-000729","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cdkn-000729","title":"Climate Financing Options for Kenya’s Private Sector","publisher":{"name":"Climate and Development Knowledge Network","organization":"climate-and-development-knowledge-network"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2014-01","source_url":"https://cdkn.org/sites/default/files/files/Private-Sector-Funding-Options.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document serves as a guide for the Kenyan private sector to access climate finance, specifically highlighting funds that support innovation in greenhouse gas emission reduction technologies, while noting a scarcity of funding for climate risk assessment and adaptation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000729#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The report identifies various funding options for the private sector in Kenya, with a primary focus on supporting innovation in technologies designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000729#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a limited availability of financing opportunities specifically dedicated to business-related climate risk assessments or adaptation measures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cdkn-000729#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","greenhouse gas emissions","climate change adaptation","Climate risk assessment","Private sector engagement"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["resource mapping"]},{"id":"wwfza-000159","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wwfza-000159","title":"An introduction to South Africa’s Water Source Areas","publisher":{"name":"WWF South Africa","organization":"wwf-south-africa"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2013","source_url":"https://wwfafrica.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_sa_watersource_area10_lo.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies that 8% of South Africa's land area generates 50% of its surface water run-off. These Water Source Areas (WSAs) are critical ecological infrastructures that feed the country's engineered water systems. The document details 21 specific WSAs across five provinces, highlighting that 16 are of national strategic importance. Major threats to these areas include coal mining, alien invasive vegetation, climate change, and land degradation. The report emphasizes that while engineered infrastructure is extensive, water security depends on the health of these natural catchments, many of which currently have low levels of formal protection.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A small fraction of South Africa's land is responsible for a majority of its surface water; specifically, 8% of the land area produces 50% of the country's surface run-off.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"South Africa's freshwater ecosystems are under significant stress, with 60% of river ecosystems and 65% of wetland types classified as threatened.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies 21 Water Source Areas (WSAs), 16 of which are considered strategic because they form the headwaters of major river systems that supply the national economy and significant downstream areas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Formal protection of WSAs is generally low, with only 16% of these areas protected as nature reserves or parks. The Western Cape has the highest protection levels, while areas in the Eastern Cape, Limpopo, and parts of Mpumalanga have very low or no protection.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several critical threats impact water source areas, including alien invasive plants which are estimated to cause a loss of 7% of available water resources, and coal mining which leads to acid mine drainage (AMD).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change is expected to impact South Africa primarily through water-related effects, with predicted lower rainfall and reduced river run-off in the Western Cape, and more intense rainfall events leading to erosion and flood damage in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Maloti Drakensberg is identified as the country's most important water source area, contributing approximately 25% of available water and supporting nearly 50% of South Africa's GDP.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwfza-000159#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","land degradation","water security"],"geography_discussed":["Western Cape","Eastern Cape","KwaZulu-Natal","Mpumalanga","Limpopo","Lesotho"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["geographic assessment","threat analysis","resource mapping"]},{"id":"sei-001175","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001175","title":"Biogaasi tootmise ja kasutamise pilootuuring Lääne-Virumaal Jäätmed mootorikütuseks","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"et","date_published":"2012","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/4434.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report investigates the feasibility of producing biomethane from waste in Lääne-Viru County, Estonia. It identifies a total biomethane production potential of up to 24.4 million m3/a by 2020, with energy crops as the largest resource. The study proposes a pilot plant in Rakvere using wet digestion technology and amine scrubbing for purification. While combined heat and power (CHP) is more profitable for a private operator due to feed-in tariffs, the report concludes that using biomethane as motor fuel provides higher social and environmental benefits for society as a whole.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The total biomethane production potential in Lääne-Viru County for 2020 is estimated at up to 24.4 million m3/a. Energy crops represent the largest share at approximately 66%, followed by industrial bio-waste (ca 13%), sewage sludge (11.5%), liquid manure (9%), and bio-waste in municipal waste (0.6%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report proposes a pilot biogas plant in the outskirts of Rakvere, specifically near the wastewater treatment plant, to be close to the county's largest waste producers: AS Rakvere Lihakombinaat, Estonian Spirit Ltd, and AS Rakvere Vesi. The recommended technology is wet digestion with a vertical digester of approximately 3,000 m3 and a pasteurizer to handle potential pathogens from industrial substrates.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For the purification of biogas into biomethane (over 99% CH4), the report selects the amine scrubbing method due to its high efficiency and very low methane losses (less than 0.1%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Comparing two usage scenarios for the Rakvere plant: Scenario B1 (combined heat and power - CHP) and Scenario B2 (motor fuel). While B1 is more profitable for the operator due to feed-in tariffs and lower investment costs, B2 (biomethane for transport) is found to be more socially profitable and provides a greater overall improvement in environmental conditions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis of food waste prevention in Lääne-Viru County suggests that by 2020, depending on the success of prevention measures, greenhouse gas emissions could be reduced by 5,000 to 17,000 tCO2eq and costs could be saved by 5 to 17 million EUR.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001175#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biogas","renewable natural gas","renewable energy","waste-to-energy","greenhouse gas emissions","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Estonia","Harju County"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["feasibility study","environmental impact assessment","economic analysis","resource mapping"]}]}