{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["quantitative tracking"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'quantitative tracking' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=quantitative+tracking","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"clipolin-000147","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000147","title":"Landscape of Climate Finance for Land Use in Brazil","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023-09-18","source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/publication/landscape-of-climate-finance-for-land-use-in-brazil/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Between 2015 and 2020, climate finance for land use in Brazil averaged US$ 6.6 billion per year, dominated by domestic private finance and rural credit. While the crop sector was the primary recipient, the report highlights a significant gap in the proportion of total rural credit that is climate-aligned and notes a decline in public budget allocations for the forest sector.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate finance for land use in Brazil averaged US$ 6.6 billion annually from 2015 to 2020, with total flows increasing from US$ 6.6 billion in 2015 to US$ 7.1 billion in 2020, representing a 65% growth in Brazilian reais.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Domestic sources provided 95% of climate finance (US$ 6.3 billion/year), with two-thirds of that (US$ 4.1 billion/year) coming from private finance, often driven by public policy obligations requiring financial institutions to allocate funds to rural credit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"International finance accounted for 5% of flows (US$ 327 million/year), primarily from public sources such as foreign governments, climate funds, and multilateral development banks. The Amazon Fund is the primary climate fund for international finance in Brazil, though its average annual approval of US$ 53 million represents only 0.7% of total land-use climate finance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Rural credit is the dominant financial instrument, channeling US$ 3.2 billion/year (48% of tracked flows). However, climate-aligned flows represent only 8% of the total annual average rural credit volume of US$ 42.2 billion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The crop sector was the largest recipient of climate finance, receiving US$ 3.9 billion/year (60%), followed by the forest sector at US$ 1.7 billion/year (25%), cattle at US$ 532 million/year (8%), bioenergy and fuels at US$ 311 million/year (5%), and multi-sector at US$ 86 million/year (1%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Finance for mitigation was the primary objective at US$ 4.5 billion/year (68%), while adaptation received US$ 1.2 billion/year (19%), and dual-objective flows totaled US$ 859 million/year (13%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Thematic bonds raised an average of US$ 1 billion/year (16%) and grew from US$ 685 million in 2015 to US$ 1.6 billion in 2020, though they remain a small part of fixed-income capital markets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public budget allocations for climate-aligned finance averaged US$ 767 million/year (11%) and were the primary tool for the forest sector (US$ 572 million/year), but experienced a decline from US$ 993 million in 2015 to US$ 394 million in 2020.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000147#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","land use","deforestation","forest conservation","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","climate bond","bioenergy","biofuel","Nationally Determined Contributions"],"geography_discussed":["Germany","Norway"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative tracking","methodological development"]},{"id":"clipolin-000646","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000646","title":"Landscape of Climate Finance for Land Use in Brazil","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023-09","source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Landscape-of-Climate-Finance-for-Land-Use-in-Brazil.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Between 2015 and 2020, climate finance for land use in Brazil averaged US$ 6.6 billion per year, with 95% originating from domestic sources. Rural credit is the dominant instrument, though climate-aligned flows represent only 8% of total rural credit. The crop sector is the primary recipient of funds, and mitigation remains the dominant objective over adaptation. The report highlights a significant decline in public budget expenditures and a growing but still small role for thematic bonds.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate finance for land use in Brazil averaged US$ 6.6 billion per year from 2015 to 2020, growing by 65% in Brazilian reais during this period, with total flows increasing from US$ 6.6 billion in 2015 to US$ 7.1 billion in 2020.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Domestic sources provided 95% of climate-aligned finance (US$ 6.3 billion/year), with two-thirds of this (US$ 4.1 billion/year) coming from private finance, largely because financial institutions are mandated by public policy to allocate funds to rural credit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"International finance accounted for only 5% (US$ 327 million/year) of total flows, primarily from public sources such as foreign governments, climate funds, and multilateral development banks, mostly via grants.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Rural credit is the primary instrument for climate-aligned land use finance, channeling US$ 3.2 billion/year (48% of tracked flows), yet this represents only 8% of the total annual rural credit volume of US$ 42.2 billion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Agricultural risk management instruments, the main tool for climate adaptation, provided US$ 1.1 billion/year, with rural insurance being the most significant at US$ 625 million/year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Thematic bonds raised an average of US$ 1 billion/year (16% of total finance), growing from US$ 685 million in 2015 to US$ 1.6 billion in 2020, primarily through issuances by Brazilian companies abroad.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Public budget expenditures for climate-aligned land use averaged US$ 767 million/year (11%) and were the primary source for the forest sector (US$ 572 million/year), but experienced a 39% real-term drop from US$ 993 million in 2015 to US$ 394 million in 2020.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The crop sector was the largest recipient of climate finance, receiving US$ 3.9 billion/year (60%), followed by the forest sector at US$ 1.7 billion/year (25%), cattle at US$ 532 million/year (8%), and bioenergy and fuels at US$ 311 million/year (5%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Finance for climate mitigation dominated the landscape at US$ 4.5 billion/year (68%), while adaptation accounted for US$ 1.2 billion/year (19%) and dual-objective flows totaled US$ 859 million/year (13%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Amazon Fund is the primary international climate fund for land use in Brazil, but its average annual approval of US$ 53 million represents only 0.7% of the total tracked climate finance for land use in the country.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000646#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","agriculture","land use","climate bond","biofuel","deforestation","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","environmental, social and corporate governance"],"geography_discussed":["Germany","Norway"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative tracking","landscape analysis","policy assessment"]},{"id":"gem-000175","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/gem-000175","title":"BOOM AND BUST COAL 2023","publisher":{"name":"Global Energy Monitor","organization":"global-energy-monitor"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023-04","source_url":"https://globalenergymonitor.org/sites/default/files/migration/reports/Boom-Bust-Coal-2023_11.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that while the world outside China is nearing a 'no new coal' milestone, a massive surge in coal permitting and construction in China is offsetting global progress. In 2022, the global coal fleet grew by 19.5 GW, driven by China, which now accounts for 68% of global capacity under development. While the U.S. and EU continue to retire capacity, the pace of global retirements remains far below the levels required to meet a 1.5C pathway, which would necessitate an average of 117 GW of retirements per year. The report also highlights the role of private finance, noting that most financial institutions' coal policies remain insufficient to align with climate science.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Global coal power capacity increased by 19.5 GW in 2022, with 45.5 GW commissioned and 26 GW retired. China was the primary driver, accounting for 59% of newly commissioned capacity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"China has seen a significant increase in coal development, with its share of global capacity under development rising from 55% in 2021 to 68% in 2022. In 2022, China permitted around 100 GW of new projects, more than quadrupling the 23 GW permitted in 2021.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Outside of China, the world is approaching a state of 'no new coal.' Pre-construction capacity outside China fell below 100 GW for the first time, reaching 96.7 GW. There are currently no new coal projects under consideration in North America or the European Union.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Current global retirement rates are insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement's 1.5C goal. Phasing out operating coal by 2040 would require an average of 117 GW of retirements annually, which is 4.5 times the capacity retired in 2022.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The United States led global coal retirements in 2022 with 13.5 GW closed. Since 2010, 139 GW of coal capacity has ceased burning coal in the U.S.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the European Union, the gas crisis and Russia's invasion of Ukraine slowed coal retirements, with only 2.2 GW retired in 2022 compared to a record 14.6 GW in 2021. However, temporary restarts of coal units only added 1% to total EU coal generation in 2022.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"India presents contradictory signals: while it commissioned only 3.5 GW of new coal in 2022 (the lowest since 2014, excluding 2020), the government plans to add nearly 56 GW of capacity by 2030 and is opening new coal blocks for auction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Private financial institutions are updating coal policies, but most are inadequate. Of 99 institutions that adopted or updated policies in 2022, only 12 were strong enough to halt support for new coal developers or set required deadlines.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"China's pledge to stop building new coal plants abroad has had mixed results; 19% (21 GW) of China-backed overseas capacity has been cancelled, but nearly 40% has moved forward.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Southeast Asia, Vietnam has significantly reduced its coal plans through the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP), agreeing to a US$15.5 billion funding package to peak emissions by 2030 and limit additional coal capacity to less than 6 GW.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"gem-000175#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","Coal phase-out","Paris Agreement","carbon neutrality","climate finance","Just Energy Transition Partnership","greenhouse gas emissions","renewable energy","energy transition","stranded asset","carbon capture and storage"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","United States","European Union","India","Vietnam","Indonesia","South Africa","Turkey","Japan","Australia","Pakistan","Bangladesh","Philippines","South Korea","Ukraine","Brazil","Chile","Peru","Panama","Colombia","Mexico","Dominican Republic","Zimbabwe"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative tracking","policy assessment","geographic comparative analysis"]}]}