{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["polling analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'polling analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=polling+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"grelat-000100","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/grelat-000100","title":"A Working Class Climate Agenda","publisher":{"name":"GreenLatinos","organization":"greenlatinos"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2026-06","source_url":"https://www.greenlatinos.org/wp-content/uploads/formidable/13/CCI_Stop-Greed-Build-Green.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report introduces Green Economic Populism (GEP), a framework that argues the affordability crisis is a structural challenge intensified by the climate crisis. It posits that reducing dependence on volatile fossil fuels can lower costs for working people across energy, food, health, housing, and transportation. The document provides polling data showing that 70% of US voters believe economic policy can simultaneously lower costs and reduce emissions, and 55% want coordinated policies to address both. It highlights successful political campaigns and labor actions in cities and states such as New York City, Seattle, New Jersey, Georgia, and Missouri that centered the intersection of climate action and material needs, such as rent stabilization, utility price controls, and decarbonized public infrastructure.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000100#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Green Economic Populism (GEP) is presented as a strategy to connect climate politics to economic issues, focusing on three pillars: 'Green' policies to cut carbon and increase resilience, 'Economic' policies to lower costs and create good jobs, and 'Populist' strategies to build working class power against elites.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000100#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Polling data indicates significant public support for integrating climate and economic policy: 70% of voters, including 65% of Republicans, believe economic policy can lower costs while reducing emissions, and 55% want elected officials to address the cost of living and climate change through coordinated policies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000100#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies a 'Climate-Cost Nexus' where environmental instability increases expenses for working people in sectors including energy and utilities, food and health, housing and insurance, and transportation and fuel.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000100#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document cites several US regional examples where centering climate and economic concerns led to political or labor victories, such as Mayor Zohran Mamdani in New York City, Mayor Katie Wilson in Seattle, and a rent strike in Kansas City, Missouri, that won electric HVAC systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000100#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","energy transition","fossil fuel","decarbonization","clean energy","energy efficiency"],"geography_discussed":["New York City","Seattle","New Jersey","Georgia","North Carolina","Washington","Minnesota","Chicago","Missouri","Kansas City","Kentucky","Maine"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy proposal","political strategy","polling analysis"]},{"id":"cliint-000036","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cliint-000036","title":"Public Support for Holding Big Oil Accountable","publisher":{"name":"Center for Climate Integrity","organization":"center-for-climate-integrity"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://climateintegrity.org/uploads/media/Climate_Integrity_Polling_Memo.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document presents data from a 2019 nationwide survey and several state-level polls showing that a majority of US voters believe oil and gas companies should pay for climate change damages. It highlights that support for suing these companies and requiring them to cover costs often increases after respondents are informed about the industry's history of deception.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000036#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A 2019 nationwide survey of nearly 17,000 voters indicated that 70% believe oil and gas companies should pay for at least some climate change costs, 71% support suing climate polluters for damages, and 83% believe these companies are at least somewhat responsible for impacts such as sea level rise and heat waves.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000036#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"State-level polling across Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Nevada, Washington, Ohio, Oregon, Maine, and North Carolina consistently shows that a high majority of voters (ranging from 79% to 90%) believe oil companies should pay for at least some climate change costs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000036#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Providing voters with information regarding the fossil fuel industry's deception generally leads to an increase in the percentage of people who believe oil companies should pay for all or most climate costs and those who support suing the companies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliint-000036#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change litigation","fossil fuel industry","climate change disinformation","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Pennsylvania","South Carolina","Nevada","Washington","Ohio","Oregon","Maine","North Carolina"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["polling analysis"]},{"id":"ACTClim-000012","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ACTClim-000012","title":"Misinformation Alert: Extreme Weather","publisher":{"name":"ACT Climate Labs","organization":"act-climate-labs"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2022-08-11","source_url":"https://www.actclimatelabs.org/misinformation-alert-commu/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document analyzes the discourse surrounding Storm Eunice and the 2022 heatwave in the UK, noting that while the heatwave drove higher climate-related engagement and polling spikes, 'Persuadable' audiences often responded with denial or dispassion. It suggests that climate NGOs avoid direct climate narratives during peak heat events, instead focusing on safety advice and emotional support, before introducing scientific facts and long-form content once the weather subsides.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ACTClim-000012#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 2022 heatwave generated significantly more climate-related discussion on social media than Storm Eunice, despite the storm having higher Google search volumes. Mentions of 'climate' on Twitter were nearly 17 times higher during the heatwave's three-day peak, and polling showed a 10% increase in people identifying the environment as a top national issue in the following week, a larger jump than seen during COP26.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ACTClim-000012#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"'Persuadable' audiences on Twitter and Facebook exhibited high levels of denial and dispassion during the heatwave. Common responses included attributing wildfires to people rather than temperature, arguing that other countries like Australia or Spain fare worse, claiming the weather is temporary, or viewing a 1.5-degree increase as pleasant.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ACTClim-000012#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several factors hinder climate narratives among Persuadables: the lack of association between 'global warming' and events like floods or storms, a misunderstanding of '1.5 degrees of warming' as a general mild increase, emotional exhaustion from prolonged weather warnings, and the rise of 'green tyranny' frames that link climate action to loss of money, jobs, or freedom.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ACTClim-000012#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To effectively reach Persuadables, the document recommends avoiding direct climate talk during heatwaves and instead using narratives focused on safety advice, thanking local service workers, and providing emotional support. Scientific facts and long-form content, such as interactive quizzes or videos, should be deployed after the event has subsided.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ACTClim-000012#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["extreme weather event","climate change communication","heat wave"],"geography_discussed":["England","Spain","Australia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["social media analysis","polling analysis"]}]}