{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["policy toolkit"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'policy toolkit' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":5,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=policy+toolkit","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"iisd-000378","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-000378","title":"Leading the Transition Locally","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2026-04-10","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/publications/report/fossil-fuel-production-subnational-states","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report argues that subnational governments are critical to the global transition away from fossil fuels because extraction facilities, workforces, and communities are located within their jurisdictions. It recommends that these governments diversify local economies, develop time-bound and financed transition roadmaps, and reduce Scope 1 and 2 emissions from existing operations. The document emphasizes that emissions reductions should complement rather than replace the transition away from production. It also advocates for multilevel policy alignment and international cooperation through alliances such as the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance and the Powering Past Coal Alliance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000378#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Subnational governments are essential to the transition away from fossil fuels because, although national governments and the private sector manage most production, the actual extraction facilities, workforces, and communities are situated within subnational states and regions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000378#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational states and regions face economic and political risks due to their dependence on fossil fuel extraction; as global demand declines, they will need specific policies to diversify government revenue streams and the local economy while protecting workers and communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000378#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report recommends a multi-pronged policy approach for subnational entities: creating sequenced and financed transition roadmaps, reducing Scope 1 and 2 emissions from current operations (without using these as substitutes for ending production), strengthening alignment with local municipalities, and participating in international peer learning initiatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000378#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["petroleum industry","energy transition","economic diversity","just transition","greenhouse gas emissions","Scope 2","Paris Agreement"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy toolkit"]},{"id":"iisd-002920","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-002920","title":"Leading the Transition Locally","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2026-04","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2026-04/fossil-fuel-production-subnational-states.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report argues that subnational governments are critical to the global energy transition because extraction facilities and workforces are located within their territories. It presents a toolkit of financial, regulatory, and enabling tools to help these governments phase out production, reduce environmental impacts, and diversify local economies. The authors categorize subnational regions into four types based on their production status and reserves, noting that early movers can reduce transition risks and attract low-carbon investment. Key recommendations include developing time-bound, sequenced, and financed roadmaps and avoiding diversification into carbon-intensive downstream activities like refining or petrochemicals.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Subnational governments hold significant influence over global fossil fuel production; in 2024, approximately 73% of oil, 71% of gas, and 100% of coal were produced within these territories.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies three primary policy objectives for subnational governments: proactively managing the transition away from production, reducing the environmental impacts of existing operations, and diversifying the local economy to ensure equity and justice.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational governments can employ various 'direct tools' to curb production, including bans on drilling, fracking moratoria, and ending new exploration licensing. Examples include Quebec's prohibition of all oil and gas exploration and New South Wales' ban on offshore petroleum drilling.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Financial tools for managing the transition include resource production taxes, the removal of production subsidies, and the creation of decommissioning funds. For example, British Columbia eliminated its Deep Well Royalty Program in 2022, which had provided USD 1.1 billion in subsidies that year.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To reduce environmental impacts, subnational governments can implement industrial carbon pricing, methane regulations, and clean energy mandates. Quebec and California have linked their cap-and-trade systems to create a large North American carbon market.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Economic diversification efforts should prioritize low-carbon sectors rather than downstream fossil fuel activities like refining or petrochemicals, which risk locking regions into carbon-intensive trajectories.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Just transition tools include the establishment of dedicated funds, such as Scotland's GBP 500 million Just Transition Fund, and the creation of advisory bodies like the Just Transition Commission.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report recommends that subnational roadmaps for transitioning away from fossil fuels be time-bound, sequenced, financed, intersectional, and developed using 'whole-of-government' and 'whole-of-society' approaches.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Subnational regions are categorized into four types: those with no production and no significant reserves, those with no production but significant reserves, those with production in structural decline, and those with stable or increasing production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002920#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["petroleum industry","just transition","economic diversity","carbon price","carbon neutrality"],"geography_discussed":["Canada","United States","Australia","Quebec","California","Scotland","Alberta","Mpumalanga","New South Wales","Brazil","Colombia","Germany","India"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy toolkit","typology","case study analysis"]},{"id":"ciel-001045","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ciel-001045","title":"Overcoming International Investment Agreements as a Barrier to Climate Action","publisher":{"name":"Center for International Environmental Law","organization":"center-for-international-environmental-law"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2024-01","source_url":"https://www.ciel.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Overcoming-International-Investment-Agreements-as-a-Barrier-to-Climate-Action.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that international investment agreements (IIAs) and the ISDS mechanism act as legal barriers to climate action by allowing fossil fuel companies to sue governments for compensation when regulations impact their returns. It outlines a three-part framework for States: removing risk through treaty termination, carveouts, or removal of ISDS clauses; reducing risk via the adoption of 'right to regulate' provisions, interpretative statements, and the careful design of climate measures; and responding to active claims using jurisdictional challenges, the 'necessity defense', and arguments against the 'legitimate expectations' of investors. The toolkit emphasizes that the urgent need to limit warming to 1.5°C may justify the termination of treaties like the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) based on a fundamental change of circumstances.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"States can eliminate ISDS risks by terminating or withdrawing from investment treaties, a practice that is becoming more common; for instance, in 2022, 84 treaties were terminated compared to 15 new IIAs concluded.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is specifically highlighted as being inconsistent with climate goals, leading several EU Member States to announce their intention to withdraw.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A 'fundamental change of circumstances' under Article 62 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) could be a legal basis for terminating IIAs, as the current scientific understanding of the incompatibility of fossil fuels with a safe climate was not foreseen when many treaties were signed.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Treaty carveouts can be used to exclude specific sectors, such as fossil fuels, or specific purpose-based measures, such as greenhouse gas regulations, from the scope of an agreement, thereby preventing ISDS tribunals from having jurisdiction.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To mitigate risk without full termination, States can use interpretative statements to clarify that non-discriminatory climate measures do not constitute indirect expropriation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"States can challenge the 'legitimate expectations' of fossil fuel investors by arguing that the need for climate-related regulatory changes was foreseeable and known to the industry for decades.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"When calculating compensation, States should argue against 'business-as-usual' projections and instead deduct the externalized costs of environmental and health impacts caused by fossil fuels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'necessity defense' under international customary law can be invoked by arguing that the climate crisis constitutes a 'grave and imminent peril' to an essential State interest, such as the right to life and a healthy environment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Non-disputing State Parties (NDSPs) and non-State actors (such as civil society) can intervene in ISDS proceedings to provide specialized knowledge and influence the interpretation of treaties to favor public interest over investor profit.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ciel-001045#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["phase-out","climate finance","climate change litigation","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["European Union","Netherlands","Canada","United States","Italy","Denmark","New Zealand","Africa","Indonesia","Argentina","Bolivia","Ecuador","Venezuela","Brazil","Nicaragua","South Africa"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["legal guide","policy toolkit"]},{"id":"prio-001256","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001256","title":"BUSINESS AND PEACEBUILDING","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2018","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/f1ecefb4-4528-4c5e-b14a-1631ee109aa4/Business and Peacebuilding Seven Ways to Maximize Positive Impact Online 2018.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report provides an evaluation of corporate peacebuilding initiatives, arguing that most 'Business for Peace' (B4P) efforts have yielded few positive impacts and can sometimes exacerbate local conflicts. It presents seven key questions for firms to assess their impact on conflict environments, local definitions of peace, socio-economic structures, and supply chain links to conflict actors. The authors conclude that the most peace-positive strategy is often to avoid conflict regions entirely and that substantive progress requires binding, independently verified regulatory initiatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The report concludes that while companies may have aspirational goals for peacebuilding, there is little evidence of significant positive impacts in the conflict-affected areas where they are most needed; in many cases, the most effective strategy for peace is for a firm to avoid the region entirely.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Assessing peace initiatives only at the firm level can overlook larger societal consequences. In places like Myanmar, the cumulative effect of multiple individually positive business-peace projects can overwhelm a society's absorptive capacity, resulting in a collective negative effect.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Corporate activities can unintentionally fuel conflict by distorting local socio-economic structures, such as when jobs are sourced from distant cities rather than locally, or when the distribution of gains is so skewed that it creates a sense of relative deprivation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Many firms fail to conduct comprehensive due diligence on their entire operational presence, often relying on subcontractors who may be owned by military-political elites or who make unreported payments to conflict actors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report argues that for corporate peacebuilding to be effective, it must be integrated into the firm's core operations and supported by the CEO and Board, rather than being relegated to CSR or public relations departments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Firms are encouraged to define a clear 'red line' for terminating operations before a situation deteriorates to avoid using self-justifying rationales to remain in a conflict zone and to provide clear signals to host governments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors state that real progress in how companies interact with conflict-affected societies requires binding regulatory initiatives that are independently verified, universally applied, and possess punitive capabilities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001256#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Sustainable Development Goals","economic development"],"geography_discussed":["Colombia","Sierra Leone","Brazil","Guatemala","El Salvador","Burundi","Central African Republic"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["evaluation","policy toolkit"]},{"id":"rmi-000728","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/rmi-000728","title":"Planning to Harness the Inflation Reduction Act: A Toolkit for Regulators","publisher":{"name":"RMI","organization":"rmi"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2024/03/Appendix_A_regulatory_collaborative_updates_and_insight_brief.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document serves as a regulatory guide, offering a structured set of inquiries to help Public Utility Commissions (PUCs) assess utility resource planning in the context of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). It organizes questions into five exhibits covering common IRA considerations, assumptions, forecasts, objectives/scenarios, and solution identification. Key areas of focus include the application of Investment Tax Credits (ITC) and Production Tax Credits (PTC), bonus adders for energy communities and domestic content, the integration of hydrogen and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technologies, and the utilization of Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment (EIR) financing. The toolkit also emphasizes the need for utilities to account for IRA-driven changes in load forecasts related to building and transportation electrification, energy efficiency, and distributed energy resources (DERs).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Regulators are encouraged to investigate how utilities are maximizing IRA benefits for ratepayers, specifically regarding infrastructure investment, emerging technologies like carbon capture and hydrogen, methane monitoring, and public-private partnerships.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The toolkit provides detailed questions to verify if utilities have updated cost assumptions for clean energy tax credits through 2032 and how they have modeled the transferability of ITCs and PTCs (or 'direct pay' for non-profits and cooperatives).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a specific focus on whether utilities are optimizing 'bonus adders' for Energy Communities and domestic content to reduce costs for ratepayers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The guide prompts regulators to scrutinize the technical and economic assumptions for hydrogen and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), including the risk of tax credit ineligibility if capture thresholds (e.g., 75%) are not met.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regulators should assess if utilities have integrated IRA incentives into load forecasts for energy efficiency, demand-side management (EE/DSM), transportation electrification (EVs), and building electrification.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The toolkit emphasizes the use of Energy Infrastructure Reinvestment (EIR) loan financing to lower the costs of new generation, transmission capacity increases, and the retirement/replacement of existing units.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document suggests that utilities should be evaluated on their coordination with state, city, and tribal entities to utilize IRA funding for rural and low-income communities, such as through the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund or the Solar for All program.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000728#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Inflation Reduction Act of 2022","Integrated resource planning","carbon capture and storage","nuclear power","energy efficiency","demand-side management","electromobility","Building electrification","distributed generation","electric power transmission","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Minnesota","Arkansas"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["regulatory guidance","policy toolkit"]}]}