{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["policy tool mapping"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'policy tool mapping' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=policy+tool+mapping","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-001525","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001525","title":"Supporting NAP development with the PROVIA Guidance: A user companion","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2014","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Climate/PROVIA-NAP-user-companion-2014.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document serves as a mapping tool between the NAP Technical Guidelines (NAP-TG) and the PROVIA Guidance, providing policy-makers in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and other developing nations with specific methods and tools for climate adaptation planning. It aligns the NAP-TG's four elements—laying groundwork, preparatory elements, implementation strategies, and monitoring/evaluation—with the PROVIA adaptation learning cycle. Key guidance includes using stakeholder and network analysis for gap assessments, employing scenario analysis for future risk characterization, and applying multi-criteria analysis for appraising adaptation options. The document emphasizes that neither the NAP-TG nor the PROVIA Guidance is prescriptive, allowing countries to define activities based on their unique circumstances.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The PROVIA Guidance is structured around a five-stage iterative adaptation learning cycle: identifying adaptation needs, identifying adaptation options, appraising adaptation options, planning and implementing adaptation actions, and monitoring and evaluation of adaptation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To support the 'laying the groundwork' phase of a NAP, the PROVIA Guidance offers tools for stakeholder and social network analysis to identify capacity gaps, as well as methods for institutional analysis to find opportunities for integrating adaptation into development planning.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For the preparatory elements of a NAP, the guidance provides technical methods for trend detection to distinguish climate change from variability, and scenario analysis to characterize future climate risks and uncertainties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Vulnerability assessments within the NAP process are supported by PROVIA's guidance on impact analysis, capacity analysis, modelling future impacts, vulnerability indication, and knowledge elicitation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The guidance distinguishes between formal decision-making methods for appraising adaptation options—such as multi-criteria analysis, cost-benefit analysis, or robust decision-making—and deliberative or participatory approaches.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the NAP process requires distinguishing between process indicators (e.g., number of workshops) and outcome indicators (e.g., changes in behaviour), while incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001525#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["national adaptation plan","climate change vulnerability","capacity building"],"geography_discussed":["Uruguay","Yemen","Germany","Montevideo"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological guidance","policy tool mapping"]}]}