{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["policy process analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'policy process analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=policy+process+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-002416","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002416","title":"CHOOSING ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS: CASE STUDIES OF MUNICIPAL WASTE POLICY IN SWEDEN AND ENGLAND","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2007-09","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/Policy-institutions/PhD_thesis_Asa_Persson.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research examines whether European governments have shifted toward a more diverse mix of 'new' environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) and a more procedurally rational decision-making process. Through a comparative analysis of municipal waste policy in England and Sweden, the author finds that while both countries diversified their instrument mixes, England's mix became more diverse and its choice processes more procedurally rational, whereas Sweden's mix remained more coercive and its choice processes more politicized. The study highlights that procedural rationality can facilitate the adoption of NEPIs, but is not a necessary or sufficient cause, as political factors—such as party-political bargaining in Sweden—often override rationalistic ideals.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The municipal waste policy instrument mix in both England and Sweden increased in diversity between 1995 and 2005, though the increase was more dramatic in England, where the number of instruments grew six-fold from five to 36.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Sweden's waste policy mix is characterized by a higher degree of coercion compared to England's, with a stronger reliance on repressive instruments such as landfill bans and higher landfill taxes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The process of choosing the Landfill Allowance Trading Scheme (LATS) in England exhibited a high degree of procedural rationality, following a linear sequence of problem definition, objective setting, and systematic assessment of alternatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In contrast, the process for introducing the waste incineration tax in Sweden showed a low level of procedural rationality, characterized by an a priori commitment to a tax instrument and a lack of systematic comparison with alternatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the Swedish incineration tax case, the decision was driven primarily by party-political bargaining, specifically the need for the Social Democratic government to secure the support of the Green and Left Parties through the 'green tax shift'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The adoption of the LATS in England was heavily influenced by the EU Landfill Directive, which imposed quantified targets that made 'certainty of outcome' a priority criterion, favoring a tradable permit system over a tax.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Sweden's use of environmental taxes is so extensive that they are no longer 'new' instruments but have become institutionalized as a traditional part of the Swedish policy style.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study suggests that while procedural rationality can facilitate the adoption of NEPIs, it is not a necessary condition, as seen in the Swedish case where a NEPI was adopted despite a highly politicized process.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Sweden's more coercive instrument mix was found to be more effective in reducing landfill amounts compared to England's approach during the study period.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002416#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","European Union"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["comparative case study","qualitative analysis","policy process analysis"]},{"id":"climtalk-000077","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/climtalk-000077","title":"SB60 | BONN CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE 2024 New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) on Climate Finance","publisher":{"name":"ClimaTalk","organization":"climatalk"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://climatalk.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Factsheet-1_NCQG.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) is designed to scale up climate finance commitments, building on the previous unfulfilled $100 billion annual target for developing countries. Following a High-Level Ministerial Roundtable at COP28, the process is moving toward a draft negotiating text. The SB60 sessions in June 2024 are focused on developing a draft framework covering the structure, timescale, sources of finance, and transparency mechanisms of the NCQG. This framework will be refined in subsequent Technical Expert Dialogues in August or September 2024, with the final agreement on the goal expected at COP29.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"climtalk-000077#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The NCQG is intended to increase climate finance commitments, specifically building upon the previous target of $100 billion annually for developing countries, with a work programme concluding at COP29.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"climtalk-000077#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The SB60 meetings in June 2024 aim to create a draft framework for the NCQG negotiating text, addressing key elements such as finance sources, timescales, and transparency mechanisms.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"climtalk-000077#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The timeline for finalizing the NCQG involves developing a draft framework at SB60, refining text options during a Technical Expert Dialogue in August or September 2024, and reaching a final agreement at COP29.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"climtalk-000077#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Bonn"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy process analysis"]}]}