{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["panel survey"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'panel survey' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=panel+survey","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001537","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001537","title":"Introducing the Mapping Attitudes, Perceptions and Support (MAPS) Dataset on the Colombian Peace Process","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2023-04-21","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/d452040b-025f-4be8-8d15-b83f15a8e90a/MAPS_Data_Feature_Paper_423.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The MAPS dataset provides survey data from over 12,000 respondents across 16 'Programs for Development with a Territorial Focus' (PDET) regions in Colombia. Comparing data from 2019 and 2021, the study finds that while overall support for the peace agreement increased over time, perceptions of security deteriorated and satisfaction with the implementation of specific provisions generally declined. The authors argue that the dataset's regional representativity reveals variations in support and trust that are often obscured in nationally-representative surveys.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The MAPS survey reveals that support for the 2016 peace agreement in war-affected communities is generally lower than levels reported in nationally-representative surveys, such as those by LAPOP and the Observatorio de la Democracia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There was a statistically significant increase in satisfaction with the peace agreement between the first wave (2019) and the second wave (2021) of the MAPS panel, with 7 of the 16 PDET regions showing significant increases and 9 remaining stable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Perceptions of security in war-affected regions deteriorated between 2019 and 2021; the proportion of respondents reporting that armed conflict persists in their community rose by 19.3 percentage points to 38.5%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Satisfaction with the implementation of specific peace agreement provisions generally eroded between 2019 and 2021, with significant declines in areas such as coca crop substitution, safety for social leaders, and truth, justice, and reparations for victims.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"At the individual level, positive changes in security assessments and increased satisfaction with overall implementation are positively correlated with increased support for the peace agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Interpersonal trust is extremely low among PDET residents, with 97% of respondents in 2021 stating they need to be very cautious when dealing with most people. Trust in FARC ex-combatants also declined significantly from 27% in 2019 to 19% in 2021.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001537#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Japan","Norway","Zimbabwe","Venezuela","Bosnia and Herzegovina","Cyprus","Sri Lanka","Nepal","Guatemala","Northern Ireland"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["panel survey","regression analysis","comparative analysis"]},{"id":"commgmu-000001","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commgmu-000001","title":"The Mutual Reinforcement of Media Selectivity and Effects: Testing the Reinforcing Spirals Framework in the Context of Global Warming","publisher":{"name":"Center for Climate Change Communication","organization":"center-for-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2014-07-18","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/all/the-mutual-reinforcement-of-media-selectivity-and-effects/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study finds that conservative media use is negatively related to global warming belief certainty and policy support, while nonconservative media use is positively associated with them. It further demonstrates a reinforcing cycle where initial media consumption shapes beliefs, which in turn increases the likelihood of continuing to consume the same type of media, subsequently strengthening those beliefs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000001#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Conservative media use is negatively associated with certainty regarding global warming beliefs and support for mitigation policies, whereas nonconservative media use is positively associated with both.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000001#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A reinforcing cycle exists where media consumption at an initial stage increases the likelihood of consuming the same media at a later stage, partly because the media influences the user's belief certainty and policy preferences, which then further reinforces those beliefs and preferences through continued use.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000001#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","climate change communication"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["panel survey"]},{"id":"prio-001466","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001466","title":"How indiscriminate violence fuels conflicts between groups: Evidence from Kenya","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/06c1d903-4cca-409e-ac95-01921dcd00be/How indiscriminate violence fuels conflicts between groups Evidence from Kenya.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research paper examines the psychological mechanisms through which political violence fuels intergroup conflict, focusing on the distinction between selective and indiscriminate violence. Using panel surveys and endorsement experiments in Nairobi and Mombasa during the 2017 Kenyan elections, the authors test the 'cognitive perspective' of group identification. They find that indiscriminate violence—attacks that target populations regardless of individual guilt—induces fear of future victimization, which subsequently increases prejudice and support for social segregation. These effects were statistically significant among Christian respondents, while results for Muslim respondents were less clear due to smaller sample sizes and different dynamics, such as fear of state retribution following Islamist attacks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Indiscriminate violence by Islamist groups significantly increases fear among Christian respondents, whereas selective violence does not have this effect.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Fear of Islamist violence leads Christian respondents to be more supportive of religiously segregated neighborhoods and less accepting of inter-religious marriage.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"An endorsement experiment confirmed that exposure to indiscriminate Islamist violence causes Christians to develop negative attitudes toward Muslims, independent of immediate security concerns.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Among Muslim respondents, exposure to indiscriminate Islamist violence was associated with an increased fear of being targeted by Kenyan state security forces (KSF), likely due to anticipated retribution.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Indiscriminate violence by Kenyan security forces (KSF) has a direct negative effect on the support for inter-religious marriage among Muslim respondents.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study concludes that the 'cognitive perspective' of group conflict has predictive power, as attacks against civilians increase the salience of divisive group identities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001466#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Nairobi","Mombasa","Somalia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["causal mediation analysis","two-way fixed effects estimation","endorsement experiment","panel survey"]}]}