{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["negotiation framework"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'negotiation framework' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=negotiation+framework","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"transfor-000017","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/transfor-000017","title":"Second Brief on NCQG simplified negotiation options","publisher":{"name":"Transforma","organization":"transforma"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2024-08-01","source_url":"https://transforma.global/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/240809-V2-Second-Brief-on-NCQG-simplified-negotiation-options.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The briefing outlines a comprehensive framework of negotiation options for the NCQG, covering its preamble, the needs of developing countries, fundamental principles, temporal scope, and the structure of the goal. It details various proposals for the quantum of finance—ranging from USD 441 billion to 2.4 trillion—and suggests mechanisms for determining this amount based on developing country needs and temperature goals. Additionally, the document proposes qualitative elements regarding gender, human rights, and technology transfer, as well as specific enhancements for access to finance, levels of concessionality, and transparency arrangements for tracking progress.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The document identifies a significant gap in climate finance, noting that the needs of developing country Parties for the pre-2030 period are currently estimated at USD 5.8–5.9 trillion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Proposed quantitative options for the NCQG vary widely, with specific figures mentioned including USD 441 billion, 1.1 trillion, 1.3 trillion, and 2.4 trillion, alongside options based on percentages of GDP or GNI.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Negotiation options for the temporal scope of the NCQG include timeframes of 5 years (2025-2029 or 2026-2030), 10 years (2025-2034 or 2026-2035), or extensions up to 2050, 2060, or 2070.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document suggests that the quantum of the goal could be determined using a 'bottom-down approach' based on the needs of developing countries, IPCC reports, and the 2023 Adaptation Gap Report.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Proposed access enhancements for climate finance include the simplification of approval procedures, the accreditation of national agencies, and the establishment of minimum floors for recipients such as Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To ensure debt sustainability, the document proposes specific minimum concessional financial terms, including interest rates of 1% or below, grace periods of 5 years or more, and maturity periods of 20 years or more.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Transparency arrangements for the NCQG may be managed primarily through the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), with potential updates to its modalities to be reviewed in 2028.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000017#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","New Collective Quantified Goal on Climate Finance","adaptation finace","technology transfer","just transition","climate justice","Blended Finance"],"geography_discussed":["Azerbaijan"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","negotiation framework"]},{"id":"transfor-000016","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/transfor-000016","title":"Brief on NCQG simplified negotiation options","publisher":{"name":"Transforma","organization":"transforma"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2024-04-01","source_url":"https://transforma.global/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/240419-V1-Brief-on-NCQG-simplified-negotiation-options.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The briefing reorganizes the 10 elements and 44 negotiation options identified by the Co-Chairs of the Ad-Hoc Work Programme (AHWP) for the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) into a condensed format. It covers critical dimensions of the goal, including temporal scope, quantum, structure, and potential sources of finance, aiming to streamline the complex set of options for stakeholders ahead of the 2024 negotiation sessions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The current NCQG negotiation framework is based on 10 core elements and 44 specific negotiation options, derived from various UNFCCC decisions, 8 Technical Expert Dialogues (TEDs), and 109 submissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Negotiation options for the temporal scope of the NCQG range from short-term (5 years), medium-term (10 years), and long-term (up to 2050) time frames, including combinations of these or outcome-oriented targets linked to net zero or GHG emission peaking.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Proposed structures for the goal include quantitative goals from developed countries or high emitters, outcome-based goals, and the use of sub-goals for specific thematic areas such as mitigation, adaptation, and loss and damage.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The quantum of the NCQG could be determined through several approaches: a bottom-up method based on the needs of developing countries, an outcome-oriented approach linked to Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, or as a percentage of the GNI or GDP of developed country Parties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Potential sources of finance are categorized by the type of instrument (e.g., grant-based for adaptation and loss and damage versus concessional loans for mitigation) and the role of actors, including public, private, philanthropic, and South-South cooperation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document outlines options for tracking and reviewing progress through the Enhanced Transparency Framework (ETF), other reporting systems (such as the OECD, IPCC, or MDBs), or aggregate reporting using UNFCCC process data.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"transfor-000016#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","Paris Agreement","climate change mitigation","climate change adaptation","loss and damage","Net-zero emissions","greenhouse gas emissions","public finance","private investment","South–South cooperation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","negotiation framework"]}]}