{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["narrative analysis"]},"warnings":[]},"total":{"value":28,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=narrative+analysis","next":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=narrative+analysis&page=2","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"saiia-001988","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/saiia-001988","title":"The BRICS Power Play: Competing Interests in Global Energy Governance","publisher":{"name":"South African Institute of International Affairs","organization":"south-african-institute-of-international-affairs"},"document_type":"policy brief","language":"en","date_published":"2026-05","source_url":"https://saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/SAIIA_PI_174_BRICSPowerPlay-002.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that the energy transition within the expanded BRICS bloc is a contest of power between incumbent fossil-industrial interests and emerging green regimes. It identifies a 'grey space' of hybrid compromise where ambitious climate rhetoric masks continued fossil fuel expansion. To navigate this, the authors introduce the BRICS Climate and Energy Compass and a strategic action plan focusing on financial architecture reform, investment in hard-to-abate sectors, and the localisation of climate finance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The expanded BRICS bloc, consisting of 10 members, is a critical arena for global climate politics, accounting for over 42% of global greenhouse gas emissions, 50% of the world's population, and approximately 43.6% of global oil production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The energy transition in BRICS is characterized by a 'grey space' of hybrid compromise, where ambitious climate goals are stated in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) but are contradicted by continued fossil fuel investment and the rebranding of conventional lending as transition finance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"BRICS members are divided into five functional actor groups with conflicting postures: the 'structural pivot' (China), 'normative entrepreneurs' (South Africa, Brazil), 'swing states' (India, Indonesia), 'incumbent guardians' (Russia, Iran, UAE), and 'adaptation-centred members' (Egypt, Ethiopia).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant gap in governance and ownership models that determine whether green innovations displace or are absorbed by the incumbent fossil-industrial complex. Six high-potential niches identified include community-owned renewables, green hydrogen industrialisation, critical minerals beneficiation, transition finance mechanisms, indigenous knowledge, and BRICS financial architecture reform.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 2026 Iran conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which disrupted about 25% of seaborne oil trade, have increased incentives for importers like China and India to accelerate domestic renewable buildout to reduce hydrocarbon dependence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document proposes three strategic financial priorities: systemic reform of global and internal BRICS financial architecture (including the New Development Bank), catalysing investment in hard-to-abate sectors like steel and cement, and localising climate finance to build sub-national capacity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-001988#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["energy transition","greenhouse gas emissions","climate finance","just transition","renewable energy","solar energy","coal","green hydrogen","critical minerals","Hard to abate sectors","Nationally Determined Contributions","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["People's Republic of China","South Africa","Brazil","India","Indonesia","Russia","Iran","United Arab Emirates","Egypt","Ethiopia","Strait of Hormuz"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy brief","systems mapping","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"isdglo-000005","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000005","title":"Irish unity, Palestine and Soleimani: Analysis of an Iranian information operation targeting Ireland","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2026-03-31","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/digital-dispatch/irish-unity-palestine-and-soleimani-analysis-of-an-iranian-information-operation-targeting-ireland/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document details an Iranian-linked information operation, Storm-2035, that deployed four X accounts impersonating Northern Irish residents between August 2024 and February 2026. These accounts used AI-generated content and 'hashtag hijacking' to promote Irish reunification and narratives supportive of the Iranian regime and Palestine. Despite low engagement, the operation demonstrates Ireland's vulnerability to foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI), particularly as it prepares for the EU presidency in 2026.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Four X accounts attributed to the Iranian-linked operation Storm-2035 impersonated individuals from Belfast, Northern Ireland, starting in August 2024. These accounts claimed to be students, graduates, or advocates for a united Ireland, but profile data revealed they accessed the platform via VPNs in the Netherlands and were connected via Android apps in Iran or \"Western Asia\".","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The operation utilised generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, to create content in English and Spanish. The accounts employed 'hashtag hijacking'—using popular but unrelated tags like #YaliCapkini (a Turkish drama)—to amplify their reach beyond their small follower bases.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The accounts demonstrated high levels of coordination, posting near-identical content on specific dates. This included coordinated praise for assassinated Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani and support for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, as well as criticism of the US for sanctioning the International Criminal Court.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Between 16 August 2024 and 4 February 2026, the accounts published 5,405 posts. Approximately 25% of the content focused on Ireland and Irish reunification, while nearly 50% focused on international topics concerning Palestine, Israel, and Iran.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The operation co-opted legitimate Irish political figures and groups to gain credibility, frequently reposting content from Sinn Féin leaders Mary Lou McDonald and Michelle O’Neill, as well as the hip hop group Kneecap.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite the effort, the operation had minimal impact, with each account gaining only around a hundred followers and achieving very low engagement on most posts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The operation's scope extended beyond Ireland; after January 2026, the accounts began supporting Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, suggesting they were part of a broader international network. Some accounts later rebranded as Scottish independence activists based in Edinburgh.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000005#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":["Iran","Palestine","Israel","United States","United Kingdom","Belfast","Netherlands","Edinburgh","Venezuela","Cork"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","narrative analysis","network analysis"]},{"id":"sei-002045","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002045","title":"Fire and Reindeer","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2026-01-16","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/fire-and-reindeer/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research examines how wildfire impacts are mapped and understood in Sweden, contrasting official reports with the narrative accounts of Sámi reindeer herders following a major 2018 fire. It argues that current wildfire management fails to recognize the practices and rights of indigenous communities, leading to stark differences in how spatial and temporal fire boundaries are perceived. The authors advocate for a more inclusive approach to landscape management that incorporates multiple human-landscape relations and values.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002045#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Official debates and national preparedness regarding climate-amplified wildfires in Sweden during the 2010s largely ignored the impacts on indigenous Sámi people and their reindeer herds.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002045#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There are significant discrepancies in how fire boundaries, both in terms of time and space, are understood and recognized depending on the landscape perspective and practice used, as evidenced by a comparison between official reports and Sámi narratives from a 2018 fire event.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002045#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Current Swedish wildfire and landscape management is not inclusive of all rights-bearers and requires reconsideration to incorporate diverse perspectives on human-landscape values.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002045#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["wildfire","climate change","indigenous rights"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["comparative analysis","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"chanmar-000202","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000202","title":"Meat vs EAT-Lancet: The dynamics of an industry-orchestrated online backlash","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2025-09","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Meat-vs-EAT-lancet-Final.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report exposes a tightly coordinated network of scientists, doctors, and journalists who used hashtags like #Yes2Meat and #ClimateFoodFacts to discredit the EAT-Lancet report. It details the role of the PR agency Red Flag and industry-funded entities like the UC Davis CLEAR Center in orchestrating these campaigns. The document also analyzes subsequent industry gatherings, such as the Dublin Declaration and the Denver Summit, as efforts to maintain the meat industry's 'social license to operate' through biased scientific narratives and identity-driven influencer campaigns ahead of the EAT-Lancet 2.0 update.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A coordinated network of 33 'mis-influencers' was central to the EAT-Lancet backlash, with the top 100 accounts responsible for nearly 50% of posts and over 90% of total engagement on Twitter.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The #Yes2Meat hashtag served as a primary rallying point for the opposition, reaching 26 million people on Twitter and successfully swaying 'undecided' users, with critical posts shared six times more frequently than supportive ones.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The PR agency Red Flag, likely acting for the Animal Agriculture Alliance (AAA), coordinated the #ClimateFoodFacts campaign to pre-emptively discredit the EAT-Lancet report by briefing 'experts' and using paid posts to reach 780,000 people on Facebook and Twitter.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Frank Mitloehner and the UC Davis CLEAR Center used the 'success' of the EAT-Lancet backlash to fundraise from industry sources, receiving at least $3.7 million between 2018 and 2023 from entities including IFEEDER, the National Pork Board, and Burger King.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 2024 Denver summit, while presented as a scientific conference, was identified as a public relations exercise intended to 'plan an ‘urgent’ communications drive' to maintain the meat industry's 'social license to operate'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Frédéric Leroy, a central figure in the mis-influencer network, promoted the 'Nourishment Table' as an alternative to official dietary guidelines, framing the EAT-Lancet report as 'plant-based interventionism'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The meat industry is leveraging 'culture war' narratives, including the 'manosphere' and conspiracy theories like the 'Great Reset', to frame plant-based diets as elite-driven attacks on masculinity and personal freedom.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000202#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","climate finance","greenwashing"],"geography_discussed":["United States","Italy","Ireland","New Zealand","South Africa","Argentina","Uruguay","Paraguay","Brazil","Denver","Dublin"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["network analysis","narrative analysis","document review"]},{"id":"sei-001500","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-001500","title":"Oil and gas production narratives in Colombia and Nigeria after the Paris Agreement","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2024-12","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/183381/oil-gas-production-narratives-colombia-nigeria.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document analyzes how Colombia and Nigeria employ narratives of development, energy security, and energy transition to justify oil and gas production, arguing that these stories often rely on inaccurate or outdated premises that entrench carbon dependency. It suggests that civil society and researchers can counter these narratives by demanding transparency, challenging flawed evidence, and promoting science-based alternatives for a just transition.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Between December 2015 and May 2022, Colombia and Nigeria used three shared narratives to justify oil and gas production: development, energy security, and energy transitions. Nigeria additionally used a narrative regarding its regional influence and international standing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The development narrative in Colombia linked oil and gas revenues to the 2016 Final Peace Agreement with FARC-EP, COVID-19 recovery, and regional development. In Nigeria, this narrative focused on using gas production to accelerate national industrialization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The energy transition narrative in both countries promotes the idea that oil and gas can be decarbonized through technology and that gas serves as a 'bridge' to renewable energy. In Colombia, sector revenues are specifically framed as essential for green investments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document argues that these narratives are often based on flawed premises, such as the myth of oil and gas as a stable revenue source, ignoring the risk of stranded assets and the energy security benefits of renewables.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'low-carbon' oil and gas and 'gas bridge' narratives are described as misleading because most emissions occur during combustion and such narratives risk diverting resources from renewables and causing carbon lock-in.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Governmental narratives can lead to policies that increase fossil fuel dependency, such as Colombia's 2020 revision to the royalty distribution system which channeled more funds to extracting municipalities to counter local resistance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Civil society organizations can counter these narratives by demanding more ambitious policies from high-income countries, challenging inaccurate premises with up-to-date analysis, advocating for industry transparency, and creating science-based narratives of a fossil-free future.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-001500#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["fossil fuel industry","energy transition","Carbon lock-in","energy security","climate finance","just transition","natural gas","stranded asset","Paris Agreement","fossil-fuel phase-out"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"glodisin-000009","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/glodisin-000009","title":"FIMI-ISAC Collective Findings I: Elections October 2024","publisher":{"name":"Global Disinformation Index","organization":"global-disinformation-index"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-10","source_url":"https://www.disinformationindex.org/files/fimi-isac-collective-findings-i-elections.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies a dual-track narrative strategy: 'Type A' narratives that exploit societal vulnerabilities to sow discord (such as anti-immigrant and gendered disinformation), and 'Type B' narratives that erode trust in democratic institutions (including electoral fraud and anti-West rhetoric). It details the use of advanced Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) based on the DISARM framework, highlighting the role of AI-generated deepfakes, website cloning, and coordinated inauthentic behavior. The findings suggest that despite EU guidelines under the Digital Services Act, voluntary recommendations are insufficient to protect democratic processes from these evolving, often state-sponsored, threats.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"FIMI actors employ a two-tiered narrative strategy: 'Type A' narratives target societal vulnerabilities to amplify xenophobia and racism, while 'Type B' narratives systematically undermine trust in electoral processes, government institutions, and public health systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-immigrant narratives are used globally to frame immigrants as threats to national security and cultural identity, with specific examples in Portugal involving fake videos of attacks and in Spain using manipulated content to link migrants to health risks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Gendered disinformation and hate speech were prominent during the 2024 EU elections, targeting female candidates and leaders, including EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to undermine their credibility and discourage female political participation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Electoral fraud narratives have been deployed in Italy, Spain, and France to delegitimize outcomes; this includes promoting null votes in Spain and the use of AI-generated deepfake phone calls in Lithuania to simulate unethical negotiations between political figures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Threat actors are increasingly using AI and sophisticated manipulation techniques, such as the 'Operation CopyCop' in France which used Large Language Models (LLMs) to rewrite reputable news articles into negative content against Macron's party.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'Doppelganger' operation and 'APT WeRedirect' utilize the cloning of legitimate government and media websites to spread pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian content, effectively hijacking trusted information sources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report concludes that voluntary risk mitigation guidelines issued by the European Commission under the Digital Services Act (DSA) are insufficient to safeguard democratic processes given the proliferation of disinformation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"glodisin-000009#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":["Lithuania","Portugal","Spain","Italy","France","New Caledonia","Catalonia","Russia","Belarus","Benin","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study analysis","TTP mapping","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"afripo-000156","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/afripo-000156","title":"Exploring the Role of Narratives in China-Africa Relations","publisher":{"name":"Africa Policy Research Institute","organization":"africa-policy-research-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-06-12","source_url":"https://afripoli.org/exploring-the-role-of-narratives-in-china-africa-relations","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes the competition between Western and Chinese narratives in Africa, specifically debunking the 'debt-trap' narrative and arguing that African states exercise strategic agency by viewing both the US and China as viable partners rather than choosing one in a zero-sum game.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"afripo-000156#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Afrobarometer survey data from 34 countries indicates that African citizens do not view the US-China rivalry as a zero-sum dilemma; 62% see China's influence as positive, while 60% view the US similarly.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"afripo-000156#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'debt-trap' narrative, which claims China deliberately creates unsustainable debt to seize state assets, is characterized as state-directed disinformation that lacks empirical evidence, as no verified cases of asset seizure have been found.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"afripo-000156#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"African states exercise agency by leveraging Chinese finance to meet domestic goals of structural transformation and nation-building, often finding Chinese creditors more flexible and collaborative than private or commercial lenders during crises.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"afripo-000156#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a disconnect between the preference for China's development model and a rejection of its political system; 70% of surveyed Africans who preferred the China model still favored democracy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"afripo-000156#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["South–South cooperation"],"geography_discussed":["United States","Kenya","Ethiopia","Zambia","Nigeria","Sri Lanka","Angola","Uganda","European Union"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","narrative analysis","comparative study"]},{"id":"issafri-002001","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/issafri-002001","title":"Participating in the Violence Prevention Forum","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Security Studies","organization":"institute-for-security-studies"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-05","source_url":"https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/pages/1716449789814-2024-05-23-SAR-59.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report examines how the Violence Prevention Forum (VPF) influences government officials in South Africa, finding that it enhances intersectoral collaboration and provides a critical 'thinking space' for personal and professional reflection. While some officials find the emotionally demanding and non-traditional methods challenging, many have adopted VPF's inclusive practices and soft skills within their own departments, such as the Department of Basic Education and the Western Cape Government, to improve policy work and internal culture.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The VPF has improved collaboration between government departments and strengthened their relationships with researchers and non-governmental organisations, allowing for the development of coordinated violence prevention initiatives.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The forum provides a 'thinking space' that allows government officials to reflect on their work and personal traumas, which helps them engage more productively and healthily in their professional environments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Participation in the VPF has led to tangible changes in government operations, including the co-design of a monitoring tool in the Department of Basic Education that integrates sports, enrichment, gender-based violence, and social cohesion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Government officials have transferred soft skills learned from the VPF and its facilitation course—such as active listening and conflict negotiation—to their own departments to manage difficult conversations and reduce power hierarchies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The VPF's non-traditional and emotionally demanding methods are not universally effective; some officials experienced discomfort with mindfulness exercises or felt the focus on personal emotions distracted from the core problem of violence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The forum helps officials recognize and grapple with toxic or 'cold' work cultures within the public service, encouraging them to model an 'ethic of care' and inclusivity within their spheres of influence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The VPF has influenced provincial policy in the Western Cape, specifically contributing to the development of strategies that place evidence-based violence prevention at the center of the safety policy response.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"issafri-002001#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Western Cape"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"caad-000024","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/caad-000024","title":"FLAME WARS Misinformation and Wildfire in Canada\u0019s Climate Conversation 2024","publisher":{"name":"Climate Action Against Disinformation","organization":"climate-action-against-disinformation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024","source_url":"https://caad.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/2024-Final-REPORT%E2%80%93Wildfire-Misinformation-01d-2.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes the spread of misinformation during the 2023 Canadian wildfires, noting a surge in arson and government-conspiracy narratives driven by right-wing/anti-establishment networks. It identifies a trend where pandemic-era distrust of public health measures has transitioned into opposition to climate and energy policies. The study also examines the 2024 German farmer protests, finding that Canadian right-wing influencers leveraged these events to frame climate policy as a tool for globalist control, though such efforts had limited traction among the broader Canadian public.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"During the 2023 wildfires, misinformation surged, featuring claims that the fires were caused by lasers, drones, weather control, eco-terrorism, and state-driven arson.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The online conversation about the 2023 wildfires evolved in stages: an initial surge in May focused on criticizing the Alberta government's preparedness, followed by a peak in June where right-wing/anti-establishment accounts promoted conspiracies that fires were set to justify climate measures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Misinformation regarding the 2023 wildfires had real-world physical consequences, including the withdrawal of BC Wildfire Service personnel due to security concerns and an act of arson in Quebec by an individual who believed the government was setting fires.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a documented transition where adversarial networks formed during the COVID-19 pandemic have expanded their targets to include climate and energy policy, framing emergency responses as pretexts for political control.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'climate lockdown' conspiracy theory, which suggests the government would use climate emergencies to restrict movement similar to pandemic lockdowns, gained significant traction during the 2021 federal election after being discussed by politicians.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Analysis of the Canadian climate conversation on Twitter/X reveals a highly concentrated influence led by political elites, with a distinct and isolated RIGHT/ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT group that frequently engages with conspiratorial content from the UK and Europe.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the lead-up to the 2024 wildfire season, the carbon tax became the dominant topic of online climate discussion, whereas the 2023 season saw a broader range of subjects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Right-wing accounts in Canada leveraged the 2024 German farmer protests to promote narratives of 'climate communism' and 'globalist climate policies,' though these efforts largely failed to mobilize Canadian farmers against climate policy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000024#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","wildfire","carbon tax","energy transition","climate policy","greenwashing","fossil fuel industry"],"geography_discussed":["Alberta","British Columbia","Quebec","Germany","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["network analysis","narrative analysis","social media monitoring"]},{"id":"isdglo-000056","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000056","title":"A Year of Hate","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/A-Year-of-Hate_Anti-Drag-Mobilisation-Australia.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report details a surge in targeted harassment and protests against all-ages drag events, such as Drag Queen Story Hours (DQSH), in Australia. It identifies a coalition of actors including neo-Nazis, COVID-19 conspiracy theorists, fringe politicians, and certain Christian groups who employ tactics like review-bombing, bomb threats, and the disruption of local council meetings. The document argues that this movement is heavily influenced by the importation of transphobic rhetoric and 'groomer' narratives from the United States and United Kingdom. While the mobilisers remain a fringe element of society, the report highlights a 'chilling effect' where venues and councils cancel events due to security concerns and threats of violence.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Anti-drag mobilisation in Australia is driven by a coalition of diverse actors, including conspiracy theorists, far-right extremists, fringe media, and Christian groups, which allows extremists to reach audiences beyond their usual circles.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The movement in Australia is heavily dependent on the importation of narratives, slurs, and imagery from the United States and United Kingdom, rather than being locally generated.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Communities that formed around COVID-19 anti-vaccine and anti-lockdown sentiments are pivoting toward anti-LGBTQ+ and anti-drag narratives to maintain their relevance and audience engagement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-drag activists employ a range of tactics to disrupt events, including physical protests, bomb threats, doxxing of staff, and 'review-bombing' of institutional social media pages.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The primary narratives used to target drag performers include accusations of paedophilia and 'grooming', claims of ideological indoctrination, and the use of religious language to describe performers as 'Satanic' or 'demonic'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The mobilisation has created a 'chilling effect' where local councils and venues cancel events not because of legislative bans, but due to security risks and the threat of violence from fringe groups.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000056#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["United States","United Kingdom","Melbourne","Sydney","Victoria","Queensland","Tasmania"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["country profile","network analysis","narrative analysis"]},{"id":"chanmar-000321","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000321","title":"Truth, lies and culture wars: Social listening analysis of meat and dairy persuasion narratives","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023-11","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Truth-lies-and-culture-wars-final.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies two primary misinformation strategies: 'disparage' (78% of cases), which attacks alternative proteins and climate science, and 'enhance' (22%), which promotes animal products through health-washing and greenwashing. It highlights the role of 'misinfluencers'—where 50 accounts drive 50% of total engagement—and examines how these narratives intersect with far-right ideologies and real-world policy debates in the Netherlands and Ireland.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000321#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Misinformation is divided into two broad strategies: 'disparage' narratives, which discredit plant-based diets and alternative proteins, and 'enhance' narratives, which promote animal-based products. The 'disparage' strategy is dominant, accounting for 78% of the misinformation posts analyzed.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000321#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'disparage' strategy employs five main attack points: representing alternative proteins as unhealthy, discrediting their environmental impact, using 'culture wars' to polarize audiences, undermining scientific research, and framing dietary changes as part of an 'elite' conspiracy known as 'The Great Reset'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000321#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","greenhouse gas emissions","regenerative agriculture","greenwashing","land use","agricultural subsidy"],"geography_discussed":["Netherlands","Ireland","United States","United Kingdom","India","Italy","France","Australia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["social listening","narrative analysis","timeline analysis","misinfluencer analysis"]},{"id":"isdglo-000012","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000012","title":"‘Climate Lockdown’","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"fact sheet","language":"en","date_published":"2023-06-19","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-explainer/climate-lockdown/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The 'Climate Lockdown' narrative is a conspiracy theory claiming that global elites use climate change as a pretext to restrict civil liberties. Emerging in early 2020, the term shifted from early discussions about environmental benefits of COVID-19 lockdowns to a tool for climate sceptics and anti-elite movements. By late 2022, the narrative evolved to target urban planning initiatives, specifically '15-minute cities' and traffic filters in Oxford, UK, falsely framing them as precursors to authoritarian movement restrictions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000012#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 'Climate Lockdown' narrative claims that 'global elites are using climate change as a pretext to restrict individual freedoms and civil liberties.' It gained significant traction in September 2020, with proponents arguing that COVID-19 restrictions were a 'precursor to future climate-driven lockdowns.'","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000012#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The narrative is integrated with broader anti-elite conspiracy theories, including the 'New World Order', the 'Great Reset', and QAnon, framing climate action as a mechanism for elites to 'exert control and impose surveillance.'","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000012#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In late 2022, the narrative shifted toward urban planning, specifically targeting the '15-minute city' concept and a 'traffic filter' scheme introduced by Oxfordshire County Council in Oxford. Conspiracy theorists falsely claimed the Oxford scheme meant citizens would be 'confined to their local areas' and that movement would be 'dependent on the local administration’s approval.'","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000012#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The '15-minute city' concept, originally designed by Carlos Moreno to ensure basic amenities are within a 15-minute walk or cycle, has been misrepresented by conspiracy theorists as a system where people are 'forced to stay within a 15-minute zone around their homes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.'","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000012#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","urban planning","greenhouse gas emissions"],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","Oxford","Germany","United States","Switzerland","Wuhan"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["narrative analysis","disinformation tracking"]},{"id":"caad-000061","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/caad-000061","title":"Online Challenges For Misinforming Latin America","publisher":{"name":"Climate Action Against Disinformation","organization":"climate-action-against-disinformation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://caad.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Report_Misinforming-Latin-America.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report examines climate misinformation surrounding extreme weather in Latin America, focusing on case studies in Brazil, Chile, and Peru. It finds that highly visible, multi-causal, and emotional events are frequently weaponized by political figures to assign blame to scapegoats or promote conspiracy theories, thereby obscuring the scientific drivers of the climate crisis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Extreme weather events are particularly susceptible to misinformation because they are highly visible, multi-causal, and elicit strong emotional responses, which allows actors to advance specific agendas by scapegoating.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Brazil, a false narrative emerged claiming that September 2023 flooding in Rio Grande do Sul was caused by the opening of dam gates rather than a cyclone; this claim reached at least 5.2 million people and was amplified by right-wing figures to attack the Workers’ Party (PT) government.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Chile, the 2023 wildfires were framed by some political leadership as primarily the result of 'terrorist' arson, a narrative that distracted from the role of a 14-year mega-drought and climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Peru, the arrival of Cyclone Yaku in March 2023 triggered conspiracy theories claiming the event was man-made, specifically attributing it to the HAARP project and the Jicamarca Observatory.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Misinformation narratives around extreme weather typically do not create new tropes but instead amplify existing political tensions and established global climate denialist narratives, such as those involving HAARP or arson.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A common tactic in climate misinformation is the deliberate misattribution of causes, shifting the focus from climatic factors to criminal or conspiratorial explanations to hinder the adoption of climate action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Some climate misinformation in Latin America is intentionally vague, cherry-picking various historical weather events to argue that such phenomena have always existed, which makes the claims harder to disprove than event-specific lies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"caad-000061#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","extreme weather event","wildfire","flood","tropical cyclone","drought","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation"],"geography_discussed":["Rio Grande do Sul","Lima","Ecuador","Honduras","Guatemala","Mexico","Colombia","Spain"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["narrative analysis","case study"]},{"id":"grelat-000109","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/grelat-000109","title":"Rumores Renovables","publisher":{"name":"GreenLatinos","organization":"greenlatinos"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://www.greenlatinos.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/graphika-report_rumores-renovables_ENG.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies a predominantly right-leaning, Spain-based network that drives anti-renewable energy discourse in Spanish. It highlights how these actors use conspiratorial narratives—such as claims that wildfires are intentionally set to clear land for wind farms—and leverage cross-platform tactics to amplify misinformation. The analysis shows that while anti-renewable posts make up less than half of a sampled set, they generate 66% of total engagement, indicating a high impact relative to their volume.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Spanish-language anti-renewables conversation is primarily driven by right-leaning accounts from Spain. The largest group in the analyzed network comprises 34% of accounts and shows explicit support for the far-right Spanish political party VOX.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-renewable narratives have a disproportionate impact on engagement. In a sample of posts, those promoting anti-renewable narratives accounted for less than 50% of the posts but generated 66% of the total engagement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A prominent narrative claims that forest fires are intentionally set to clear land for renewable energy projects. This claim appeared during Spain's July 2022 wildfires and the March-April 2023 Asturias wildfires, and has also been linked to fires in Hawaii and Greece.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Other core anti-renewable narratives include claims that wind turbines kill whales (specifically citing the film \"Thrown To The Wind\"), that solar panels pollute groundwater with lead and cadmium, and that the energy transition is a business designed to enrich global elites.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The volume of anti-renewable content peaks in correlation with extreme weather events or policy updates. Examples include peaks following the Asturias forest fires in April 2023 and an announcement by Mexican President López Obrador regarding the purchase of gas plants and a wind farm.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-renewable actors employ specific dissemination tactics, including translating English or Greek content into Spanish to fit local contexts and using multiple social media assets to boost reach, such as various regional VOX Facebook pages posting identical content.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"grelat-000109#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","wind power","solar energy","climate change disinformation","energy transition","electric vehicle"],"geography_discussed":["Mexico","Argentina","Greece","Hawaii","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["network analysis","narrative analysis","social media monitoring"]},{"id":"isdglo-000164","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000164","title":"Uisce Faoi Thalamh An Investigation Into the Online Mis- and Disinformation Ecosystem in Ireland","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh-Summary-Report.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies a growing online mis- and disinformation ecosystem in Ireland, where far-right actors have transitioned from pandemic-related conspiracy theories to targeting immigrants and the LGBTQ+ community. Based on an analysis of over 13 million posts, the study finds that social media platforms are failing to enforce community guidelines, allowing harmful content to proliferate. Twitter (X) is the most active platform, while Telegram serves as a key hub for organization. The research highlights that online disinformation fuels offline hostility and violence, including vigilante-style attacks and protests. It recommends stronger platform regulation, algorithmic transparency, and increased data access for researchers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The online mis- and disinformation ecosystem in Ireland grew between 2020 and 2023, with increases in the number of active accounts, posts, and engagement levels across all analyzed platforms.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Social media platforms are failing to enforce their own community guidelines, creating an 'enforcement gap' that allows harmful, false, or misleading content to remain active and reach audiences.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Twitter (now X) is the primary hub for this ecosystem, hosting the highest number of accounts and serving as the dominant platform for eight of the nine analyzed topics.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Far-right actors and alternative media outlets are the primary drivers of disinformation; these actors often use a 'veneer of credibility' to promote conspiratorial claims and hateful ideologies, including white nationalism and antisemitism.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The focus of the disinformation ecosystem shifted from COVID-19 health narratives in 2020-2021 to the war in Ukraine, and subsequently to anti-immigration and anti-LGBTQ+ narratives in early 2023.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Online disinformation has directly contributed to offline violence and hostility, including anti-lockdown protests, vigilante-style violence linked to anti-immigration rhetoric, and protests targeting libraries and schools over LGBTQ+ issues.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change is increasingly being exploited by far-right political parties to frame the issue as a 'culture war' and a conspiracy to control the population, often to position themselves as defenders of rural interests.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000164#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","climate change"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["landscape study","narrative analysis","platform analysis"]},{"id":"isdglo-000166","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000166","title":"Uisce Faoi Thalamh An Investigation Into the Online Mis- and Disinformation Ecosystem in Ireland","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Uisce-Faoi-Thalamh_Topic-Analysis.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies health as the most prominent topic of mis- and disinformation in Ireland, followed by Irish politics and immigration. It highlights the role of alternative media outlets like Gript and TheLiberal.ie in amplifying false narratives, and documents the use of conspiratorial tropes—such as the 'Great Replacement' and 'plantation' narratives—to fuel anti-immigrant sentiment and target political figures. The analysis also covers the spread of COVID-19 misinformation, anti-LGBTQ+ campaigns, climate change denial, and 5G conspiracy theories, noting a significant overlap between these themes and a tendency for narratives to be imported from international far-right movements.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Health was the most discussed topic in the Irish mis- and disinformation ecosystem, accounting for 14.27% of the content produced between January 2020 and April 2023.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Alternative media outlets Gript and TheLiberal.ie are central to the ecosystem; Gript was the most shared media platform for seven of the nine topics analysed and received 30% of all shares in the dataset.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Discussions regarding immigration surged in late 2022 and 2023, with the term 'plantation' being used as a localized version of the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory to frame asylum seekers as an enemy force intended to replace indigenous populations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Irish politics was the second most popular topic (8.1%), with high levels of threatening and violent rhetoric directed at senior government figures, including calls for politicians to be sent to the gallows.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-LGBTQ+ narratives have increased significantly, with a 1571.5% increase in average daily posts from 2020 to 2023, often employing the 'groomer' slur to frame the community as a threat to children.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate-related disinformation often frames environmental action as a 'culture war' or a 'climate lockdown' conspiracy designed by global elites to restrict individual freedoms.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Russia-Ukraine conflict (3.33% of content) saw the proliferation of pro-Kremlin narratives and the use of the sanctioned Russian state media outlet RT as a frequent reference point.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"5G conspiracy theories peaked during the early COVID-19 pandemic, with some users encouraging the vandalism and arson of telecom masts based on false claims that the technology was linked to the virus.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Conspiracy narratives involving the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the 'Great Reset' were the most popular within the conspiracy dataset, often linking these to a 'globalist' agenda for mass immigration.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000166#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change","carbon dioxide emissions","energy poverty","2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference"],"geography_discussed":["Dublin","Finglas","Dungarvan","East Wall","Ballymun","World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["narrative analysis","quantitative analysis","network analysis"]},{"id":"isdglo-000167","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000167","title":"A Year of Hate","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Understanding-Threats-and-Harassment-Targeting-Drag-Shows-and-the-LGBTQ-Community.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies a global convergence of far-right groups, conspiracy theorists, and 'parents' rights' movements targeting drag events to denigrate the LGBTQ+ community. While the US is the primary driver of narratives and the only country in the set to pass anti-drag legislation, similar tactics like doxxing and harassment are appearing globally. The report highlights the use of 'save the children' and 'groomer' narratives to justify extremism and warns that these fringe tropes are becoming mainstreamed in political discourse.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Anti-drag activism is driven by loose coalitions consisting of far-right groups, COVID-19 conspiracy theorists, fundamentalist religious activists, and right-wing influencers. While political support for these actions exists in France, Australia, and the US, only in the US are a significant number of mainstream party elected representatives actively engaging in anti-drag rhetoric.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The United States serves as the global epicenter for anti-drag activity, recording the highest number of protests and violent incidents, including the Club Q shooting and an attempted arson. The US also exports the narratives and tactics used by movements in other countries and is the only reviewed nation where anti-drag legislation has been successfully enacted.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-LGBTQ+ actors globally employ a shared set of harassment tactics, including doxxing, threats of violence, coordinated harassment of venues, and 'review bombing' of public services. Despite these pressures, the majority of targeted performances are not cancelled; in the US dataset, only 6.4% of targeted performances were cancelled.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'protecting children' narrative is the primary justification for extreme protests, framing drag performers as 'groomers' or predatory 'ideological indoctrinators'. This framework often overlaps with QAnon-related 'save the children' conspiracy theories to justify extreme actions as necessary to prevent harm to minors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several secondary narratives are used to delegitimize LGBTQ+ identities, including framing drag as misogyny (primarily in the UK and Australia), conflating drag performers with transgender individuals, and claiming that LGBTQ+ identities are a 'gender ideology'. In Australia, some activists specifically link LGBTQ+ identities to Satanism, describing performers as 'demons'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Anti-drag activists frequently target public libraries and councils by claiming that hosting drag events is a waste of public resources. This narrative is used as a vector to pressure local governments to cancel events through template complaints and harassment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000167#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Ireland","Finland","Sweden","Switzerland","Europe","Central Asia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["narrative analysis","ethnographic monitoring"]},{"id":"prio-001260","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001260","title":"The double duality of migrant smugglers: an analytical framework","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/9d255880-a0f1-4aa9-aeee-50f4ce42993b/Carling 2023 The double duality of migrant smugglers.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The author introduces the 'double duality' framework, arguing that smugglers are simultaneously perceived as problems and solutions by both migrants and states. For migrants, smugglers provide essential mobility but pose risks of exploitation; for states, smugglers undermine border control but provide 'moral capital' that justifies restrictive policies. The paper analyzes how destination states use a 'protection narrative'—casting smugglers as villains and migrants as victims—to maintain political authority while limiting asylum access. It further distinguishes between 'facilitation' and 'exploitation' to show that not all dangers faced by migrants originate from smugglers, and that counter-smuggling measures often shift risks onto the migrants themselves.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The 'double duality' framework posits that smugglers occupy two simultaneous roles for both migrants and states: they are a 'threat, or a problem' and a 'resource, or a solution'. For migrants, they provide necessary migration opportunities but can be agents of abuse. For states, they challenge border control but serve as a source of 'moral capital' to justify anti-migrant measures by framing restrictive policies as protective actions against brutal smugglers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Migrant vulnerability during smuggling is often rooted in structural factors rather than the smugglers' intent. These foundations include physical isolation in deserts or at sea, the need for concealment, overcrowding of vehicles for profit, and a lack of legal protection. While smugglers can mitigate these risks, they may also exploit them for financial gain.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Smugglers are driven by two primary incentives: avoiding prosecution and maximizing profit. Increased state penalties and counter-smuggling resources have led smugglers to minimize their own exposure, often by abandoning migrants or requiring them to complete journeys alone, effectively shifting the risk from the smuggler to the migrant.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author distinguishes between 'facilitation' (helping migrants overcome obstacles) and 'exploitation' (depriving migrants of resources or integrity for gain). While smuggling inherently involves facilitation, not all smuggling is exploitative, and not all exploitation is carried out by smugglers; other actors, such as militias or criminals, may exploit migrants within the smuggling context.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Destination states have shifted their narrative from one of 'integrity and security' (targeting illegal labor migration) to a 'protection narrative'. In this current narrative, states cast themselves as heroes protecting 'naive and vulnerable victims' from 'cynical profiteers'. This framing allows states to maintain legitimacy while implementing measures that limit the ability of refugees to claim asylum.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The role of smuggling in the European migration management system has evolved through three phases. It began as a pathway to illegal work, shifted toward a system of interception and detention, and has recently become a primary route for asylum seekers. The current state anxiety centers on the pathway where smuggling leads to approved asylum claims, which are viewed as 'unpopular and unwanted immigration'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001260#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Spain","Morocco","Norway","Turkey","Greece","United States","Mexico","Ethiopia","Egypt"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["analytical framework","narrative analysis","policy analysis"]},{"id":"roots-000007","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/roots-000007","title":"Online Challenges For Misinforming Latin America: narrative analysis of extreme weather in Brazil, Chile and Peru","publisher":{"name":"Roots","organization":"roots"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2023","source_url":"https://poweredbyroots.org/media/pages/what-we-do/tackling-climate-disinformation/4322d7c55d-1714051167/report_misinforming-latin-america.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report examines climate misinformation following extreme weather events in Latin America, focusing on case studies in Brazil, Chile, and Peru. It finds that the high visibility, multi-causal nature, and emotional impact of these events make them ideal for actors to sow confusion, assign blame to scapegoats, and advance political agendas. In Brazil, a cyclone led to false claims about 'burst dams' to attack political opponents. In Chile, wildfires were framed as 'terrorist' arson to distract from a 14-year mega-drought. In Peru, Cyclone Yaku was falsely attributed to the HAARP project. The report concludes that these narratives often amplify existing political polarizations and rely on the misattribution of causes to hinder climate adaptation and mitigation efforts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Extreme weather events are particularly susceptible to misinformation because they are highly visible, multi-causal, and elicit strong emotional responses, which allows actors to use them as 'proof points' for agendas or to channel anxiety toward scapegoats.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Brazil, a September 2023 cyclone in Rio Grande do Sul triggered a false narrative claiming floods were caused by the opening of dam gates, a claim propagated by local politicians and right-wing figures to attack the PT (Workers’ Party) government.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Following the February 2023 wildfires in Chile, a narrative emerged framing the disasters primarily as the result of 'terrorist' arson, which distracted from the role of a 14-year mega-drought and climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In Peru, the impact of Cyclone Yaku in March 2023 was falsely attributed to the HAARP project and the Jicamarca Observatory, leveraging a global conspiracy theory to suggest the weather was man-made.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate misinformation in these regions typically does not create new tropes but instead amplifies existing political tensions and established global denialist narratives, such as those regarding HAARP or arson.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A consistent strategy across the analyzed cases is the deliberate misattribution of the cause of damage to criminal or conspiratorial intentions to shift focus away from climatic factors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Some climate misinformation is intentionally vague, cherry-picking historical weather events to argue that current extremes are normal, which makes such claims harder to disprove than event-specific lies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Official government interventions to debunk misinformation, such as the Brazilian Attorney General compelling a journalist to retract claims, can successfully discredit specific lies but do not necessarily improve the overall information ecosystem.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"roots-000007#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation","extreme weather event","flood","wildfire","tropical cyclone","drought","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation"],"geography_discussed":["Rio Grande do Sul","Biobío Region","Lima","Ecuador","Honduras","Guatemala","Mexico","Colombia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["narrative analysis","case study"]},{"id":"isdglo-000084","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/isdglo-000084","title":"Deutschland und der angebliche Klimalockdown","publisher":{"name":"Institute for Strategic Dialogue","organization":"institute-for-strategic-dialogue"},"document_type":"report","language":"de","date_published":"2021","source_url":"https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Deutschland-und-der-angebliche-Klimalockdown.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report details the transition from the term 'climate dictatorship' to 'climate lockdown' in German social media, identifying key political triggers and the role of platforms like Telegram in fusing climate skepticism with broader conspiracy theories such as the Great Reset.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Between January 2020 and November 2021, there was a observable shift in right-wing discourse from using the term 'climate dictatorship' (Klimadiktatur) to 'climate lockdown' (Klimalockdown). The latter is considered to have higher mobilization potential because it evokes recent negative experiences from the pandemic.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'climate lockdown' narrative gained significant traction following two specific events in 2021: a Federal Constitutional Court ruling in April that found the Climate Protection Act insufficient, and a subsequent statement by Saxon Minister President Michael Kretschmer in May stating that no one wanted a 'climate lockdown'. Both events were instrumentalized by AfD politicians and conspiracy theorists to claim that restrictions on fundamental rights were imminent.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"On Telegram, the 'climate lockdown' narrative was frequently merged with the 'Great Reset' conspiracy theory, which posits that a global elite initiated the pandemic to reshape society. In this context, climate lockdowns were depicted as a 'filler' to maintain restrictions once COVID-19 infection rates declined.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The narrative was propagated by a variety of actors, including AfD politicians (such as Jörg Meuthen and Alexander Gauland), right-wing influencers, and state-funded media like RT Deutsch. Additionally, some commercial entities used the fear of climate lockdowns to market precious metals as a form of crisis protection.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report concludes that the use of pandemic-related vocabulary as a political weapon is part of a broader effort by right-wing and extremist actors to undermine trust in democratic institutions, driven by a fundamental distrust of government rather than specific policy details.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"isdglo-000084#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate policy","climate change disinformation","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["social media analysis","narrative analysis"]}]}