{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["multilevel regression"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'multilevel regression' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=multilevel+regression","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001558","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001558","title":"Microfoundations of civil conflict reconciliation: Ethnicity and context","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/23ea6672-0312-405c-9802-b1b1491130a6/Microfoundations of Civil Conflict Reconciliation Ethnicity and Context.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research paper analyzes individual-level support for the 2001 Framework Agreement in Macedonia using a geo-referenced survey from 2005. The authors test whether local ethnic settlement patterns or proximity to conflict zones influence reconciliation preferences. The primary finding is that ethnic identity is the dominant factor, with ethnic Albanians strongly supporting the agreement and ethnic Macedonians predominantly opposing it, while contextual factors like local ethnic parity or distance to violence have only feeble or insignificant effects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Ethnic identity is the most powerful determinant of support for the peace agreement, far outweighing other individual or contextual factors. Ethnic Albanians show very strong support, while ethnic Macedonians remain predominantly opposed several years after the conflict.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'contact hypothesis', which suggests that relative ethnic parity in a local area reduces inter-group discrepancies in preferences, was not supported by the empirical data.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is indicative evidence for a 'dominance perspective' regarding decentralization: ethnic Macedonians living in municipalities with a high share of Albanians are less likely to support the transfer of power from the central state to local authorities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Physical proximity to conflict zones has a small effect on support for decentralization, where those furthest from violent events tend to be more supportive, but it does not increase polarization between the two ethnic groups.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The degree of polarization is significantly higher regarding minority rights than regarding decentralization; ethnic identity explains 75% of the variance in support for minority rights compared to 26% for decentralization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001558#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Kosovo"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative","multilevel regression","survey analysis"]}]}