{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["methodology proposal"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'methodology proposal' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=methodology+proposal","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-000161","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000161","title":"distribution system operators","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2024-09-30","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/distribution-system-operators/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The paper addresses the lack of a working definition for the 'active DSO' role amidst the transition to net zero. It introduces a framework to measure DSO activity across dimensions including flexibility, innovation, and the integration of distributed energy resources, specifically applying this methodology to UK electricity and natural gas DSOs.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000161#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The role of the distribution system operator (DSO) is evolving due to net zero requirements, necessitating new roles to support decarbonization-focused technologies and business models.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000161#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite ongoing discussions regarding the 'active DSO', there is currently no established working definition for the term.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000161#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed measurement framework for DSO activity focuses on three primary dimensions: innovation, flexibility, and the integration of distributed energy resources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000161#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["decarbonization","electric power industry","Net-zero emissions"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodology proposal","case study"]},{"id":"rmi-000795","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/rmi-000795","title":"Approach to Quantify Net Material Emissions Impact of Renewable Energy Purchases","publisher":{"name":"RMI","organization":"rmi"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2022-05","source_url":"https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2022/10/renewable_energy_emissions_score_approach.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"RMI proposes the RE Emissions Score to move beyond qualitative assessments of renewable energy procurement. The score calculates the percentage of Weighted Avoided Emissions relative to Total Induced Emissions, using marginal emissions factors and a procurement factor based on the ratio of Energy Attribute Certificate (EAC) costs to the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). This approach aims to incentivize companies to locate operations in low-emissions grids and fund new renewable capacity in high-emissions grids.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Current renewable energy procurement tracking via Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs) is flawed because it treats all certificates as equal regardless of their actual material impact on emissions or their ability to fund new projects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The RE Emissions Score is a composite percentage that compares Weighted Avoided Emissions (renewable energy purchased multiplied by the marginal emissions factor of the location and a procurement factor) to Total Induced Emissions (total electricity purchases multiplied by the marginal emissions factor of the usage location).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Procurement Factor (PF) is calculated as the ratio of the price of an EAC to the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) to ensure purchases contribute to new generation rather than just shifting emissions attribution or crowding out existing supply.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The methodology utilizes marginal emissions factors—the rate at which emissions change with a small addition to electricity load—rather than average factors to accurately reflect the induced or avoided emissions of a company's activities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To achieve a higher RE Emissions Score, companies are incentivized to locate their operations in areas with low marginal emissions and procure renewable energy in areas with high marginal emissions to drive broad grid decarbonization.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"While calculations should be performed on an annual basis at minimum, the document recommends monthly or hourly granularity to account for grid dynamics, such as renewable curtailment, to maximize the score.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000795#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["power purchase agreement","carbon accounting","Grid decarbonization","Scope 2"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodology proposal","quantitative framework"]},{"id":"iisd-002790","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-002790","title":"Integrating the Environment into the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2005-06","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/economics_integrating_environment.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The authors argue that traditional PRSP review processes, such as those used by the World Bank and IMF, often overlook the critical links between the environment and poverty. They propose a new evaluation framework that shifts from a 'dominant preference model'—where environmental issues are imposed externally—to a stakeholder-driven approach. This methodology uses an ecosystem services framework to identify specific poverty-environment links (e.g., provisioning, regulating, and cultural services) and assesses the degree of stakeholder participation, policy coherence, and monitoring systems. The paper provides a detailed 18-question survey and a scoring system (0-3) to quantify a country's performance in integrating the environment into its poverty reduction strategies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Standard PRSP review processes conducted by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund lack specific questions regarding the environment, leading to poor environmental performance scores; for instance, a 2002 World Bank evaluation of 40 PRSPs yielded a score of only 0.9 out of 3 for environmental performance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors critique the existing World Bank methodology for evaluating environmental performance as a 'dominant preference model' because it imposes a pre-defined set of environmental issues and penalizes countries for omitting issues that may not be critical in their specific local context.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed methodology replaces traditional categories like land use, water, and air with an 'ecosystem approach' based on ecosystem services—defined as benefits ecosystems provide for human well-being—to better identify critical links to poverty constituents such as hunger, material wealth, and security against natural hazards.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed evaluation framework is structured around five themes: identifying poverty-environment links, the degree of stakeholder participation, measurement and evaluation, policy coherence, and the review and revision process.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The methodology employs a scoring scale from 0 to 3 across 18 questions to determine a country's overall performance, using the dominant response from stakeholders to allocate scores for each question.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-002790#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["ecosystem service","natural resource management","sustainable development"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodology proposal","policy analysis"]}]}