{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["methodological application"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'methodological application' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=methodological+application","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-000062","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000062","title":"Bioenergy projects and sustainable development: which project types offer the greatest benefits?","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2013-07-31","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/bioenergy-projects-and-sustainable-development-which-project-types-offer-the-greatest-benefits/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The analysis finds that sustainable development benefits vary significantly across bioenergy project types, with those utilizing agricultural farm residues claiming the most benefits and those using industrial forest residues claiming the fewest.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000062#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The sustainable development benefits claimed by bioenergy projects vary as significantly across different project types as they do across all other types of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000062#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Among the bioenergy projects analyzed, those utilizing agricultural farm residues report the highest number of sustainable development benefits, whereas projects relying on industrial forest residues report the lowest.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000062#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To better guide international mitigation finance and CDM reform, there is a need for improved sustainability assessments of biomass energy projects, specifically through mandatory ongoing monitoring of benefits and post-implementation evaluations on the ground.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000062#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["bioenergy","sustainable development","clean development mechanism","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological application","comparative analysis"]},{"id":"cmw-000868","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cmw-000868","title":"Over-crediting analysis PoA 10415 Results from python analysis","publisher":{"name":"Carbon Market Watch","organization":"carbon-market-watch"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://carbonmarketwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Results-Over-crediting-analysis-10415.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The analysis finds that PoA 10415 is likely to issue 26.33 times more credits than it should have across monitoring periods 5, 6, and 7. This over-crediting is driven by multiple factors, with the fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB) contributing a factor of 2.94 and fuel stacking contributing 2.19. The project, based in Myanmar, is transitioning from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to the Article 6.4 mechanism of the Paris Agreement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cmw-000868#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Based on the application of Gill-Wiehl's (2024) methodology, PoA 10415 is likely to issue 26.33 times more credits than it should have across monitoring periods 5, 6, and 7.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cmw-000868#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The over-crediting is the result of several contributing factors across the monitoring periods, with the highest individual impact coming from the fNRB value at 2.94 and fuel stacking at 2.19.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cmw-000868#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The project PoA 10415 has been approved by the Article 6.4 Supervisory Body to transition from the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to the Article 6.4 mechanism, also known as the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism (PACM).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cmw-000868#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon credit","clean development mechanism"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative analysis","methodological application"]}]}