{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["methodological annex"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'methodological annex' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=methodological+annex","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"client-000939","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/client-000939","title":"Taking stock 2024 – are TACs set to achieve MSY?","publisher":{"name":"ClientEarth","organization":"clientearth"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-11","source_url":"https://www.clientearth.org/media/xhzhieqc/taking-stock-2024-are-tacs-set-to-achieve-msy-annex-iii.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document is an annex listing fish species and specific TAC codes excluded from a core analysis of MSY achievement. It details the reasons for exclusion, such as area mismatches between TACs and scientific advice, unavailable advice, or changes in TAC units.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"client-000939#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A significant number of TACs were excluded from the core analysis due to 'area mismatch', where the geographic area of the TAC does not align with the area of the scientific advice. This affected species including Blue ling, Common sole, Horse mackerel, and Megrim.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"client-000939#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Certain species were excluded because scientific advice was not available for all years, specifically the case for Sandeel (Ammodytes spp.) across multiple TAC codes (SAN/234_1 through SAN/234_7).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"client-000939#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Other reasons for exclusion from the core analysis included the removal of a TAC (e.g., Greater forkbeard and Orange roughy), changes in the advice unit (e.g., certain Cod and Herring stocks), or changes in the TAC unit throughout the years (e.g., Deep-sea sharks and Saithe).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"client-000939#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis maintained its initial scope for consistency across years, despite considering an extension in 2024 for species where mismatches had been resolved, such as turbot, brill, lemon sole, and witch.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"client-000939#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity conservation"],"geography_discussed":["Norway"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological annex"]},{"id":"clipolin-000361","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000361","title":"The Triple Gap in Finance for Agrifood Systems: Annexes","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2024-11","source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Annex_The-Triple-Gap-in-Finance-for-Agrifood-Systems.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document outlines the methodological frameworks used to quantify climate finance needs for agrifood systems. It establishes a comprehensive taxonomy developed by CPI and FAO covering sectors such as crop and livestock systems, forestry, fisheries, and food diets. The 'top-down' approach aggregates data from 46 publications, using seven key reports to estimate needs for 2024-2030, while the 'bottom-up' approach extrapolates data from 167 Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). The analysis highlights significant data gaps for the post-2030 period and notes that agrifood system finance needs in low-income countries represent a larger relative proportion of their economy, averaging 2.7% of GDP.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000361#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"CPI and FAO developed a harmonized taxonomy for agrifood systems that expands beyond traditional AFOLU classifications to include 'biodiversity, land, and marine ecosystems' to support systemic change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000361#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The top-down methodology reviewed 46 reports, but only seven provided quantified assessments of future investment needs that met the criteria for recency (2019-24), comprehensiveness, primary data, and granularity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000361#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a critical lack of data for climate finance needs beyond 2030; only two of the seven primary reports used in the top-down approach provided estimates for the 2031-50 period.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000361#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The bottom-up approach analyzed 167 NDCs, but found that many lack disaggregated financial figures at the sectoral level, leading to a likely underrepresentation of the actual costs of climate action in agrifood systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000361#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate finance","Nationally Determined Contributions","agroforestry","regenerative agriculture","forest conservation","aquaculture","biodiversity","climate change adaptation","climate change mitigation","transition finance"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological annex","literature review","data extrapolation"]}]}