{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["matching analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'matching analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=matching+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"wri-001706","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-001706","title":"CLIMATE BENEFITS, TENURE COSTS","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/Climate_Benefits_Tenure_Costs.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report provides an economic analysis of securing indigenous land rights in the Amazon basin of Bolivia, Brazil, and Colombia. Using matching analysis, it finds that tenure-secure indigenous forestlands have significantly lower deforestation rates than similar non-secure lands. A benefit-cost analysis indicates that the investment is low-cost and high-benefit, with total ecosystem service benefits estimated between $679 and $1,530 billion over 20 years, while costs represent less than 1 percent of these benefits. The report argues that securing indigenous tenure is a more cost-effective carbon mitigation measure than fossil carbon capture and storage. It recommends that governments reform laws to strengthen community land rights and integrate tenure security into their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Tenure-secure indigenous forestlands in Bolivia, Brazil, and Colombia exhibit significantly lower annual deforestation rates compared to similar lands without secure tenure between 2000 and 2012.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Securing indigenous forestland tenure is a high-benefit investment, providing global carbon benefits estimated at US$25\u0010\u001034 billion over 20 years in net present value, avoiding 42.8\u0010\u001059.7 Mt CO2 emissions annually.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Local and regional ecosystem-service benefits from tenure-secure indigenous forestlands, including pollination, nutrient retention, and hydrological services, are estimated between $679 and $1,530 billion over the next 20 years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The costs of securing indigenous forestland tenure are very low relative to the benefits, estimated at $45/ha in Bolivia, $68/ha in Brazil, and $6/ha in Colombia over 20 years, amounting to at most 1 percent of total benefits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Securing indigenous forestland tenure is more cost-effective for carbon mitigation than fossil carbon capture and storage; costs range from $2.04\u0010\u001011.88/tCO2, whereas coal-fired and gas-fired plant capture costs are $58/tCO2 and $85/tCO2 respectively.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Avoided CO2 emissions from secure indigenous lands could reduce national greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 9 percent in Bolivia and 3 percent in Brazil and Colombia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001706#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["deforestation","carbon sequestration","ecosystem service","climate change mitigation","Nationally Determined Contributions","carbon capture and storage","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Mexico","India","Nepal","Tanzania","Africa","Asia","Latin America"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["benefit-cost analysis","matching analysis"]}]}