{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["input-output modeling"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'input-output modeling' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=input-output+modeling","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"wri-001773","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wri-001773","title":"THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF THE NEW CLIMATE ECONOMY IN RURAL AMERICA","publisher":{"name":"World Resources Institute","organization":"world-resources-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2021-07","source_url":"https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/2021-07/new-climate-economy-rural-america.pdf?VersionId=5CSkarKRGuxq8g0rtCVeFELu.e1eHtWt","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes how a $55 billion annual federal investment in clean energy and land restoration could generate nearly 260,000 rural jobs and $21.7 billion in annual value added for rural US economies. It identifies seven priority investment pathways: renewable energy, energy efficiency, grid modernization (transmission, distribution, and storage), environmental remediation of fossil fuel sites, tree restoration on federal and non-federal lands, and wildfire risk management. The analysis emphasizes that nearly 45% of these jobs would benefit economically disadvantaged rural counties. The document provides specific state-level data and proposes federal policy vehicles, such as tax credits and grant programs, to catalyze these investments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"An annual federal investment of $55 billion across seven climate economy pathways, with $14.9 billion directed to rural counties, would support nearly 260,000 rural jobs for at least five years, totaling 1.3 million job-years.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed investments would generate $21.7 billion in annual value added for rural economies, including $12.9 billion in employee compensation and $1.6 billion in tax revenues.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Economically disadvantaged rural counties, defined by the Distressed Communities Index, would capture nearly 45% of the created rural jobs (over 118,000 jobs) and $9.8 billion in annual added value.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Investment in renewable energy ($18.8 billion national / $3.8 billion rural annually) would create 31,600 rural jobs and $3.4 billion in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Energy efficiency investments ($8.3 billion national / $2.1 billion rural annually) would support approximately 29,800 rural jobs and $2.9 billion in annual rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Grid modernization through transmission, distribution, and storage ($19.6 billion national / $3.4 billion rural annually) would create 48,800 rural jobs and $5.8 billion in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Environmental remediation of abandoned fossil fuel infrastructure ($2.4 billion national / $1.3 billion rural annually) would support 14,600 rural jobs and $2 billion in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Tree restoration on non-federal lands ($4.3 billion national / $2.8 billion rural annually) is a major job driver, supporting 76,200 rural jobs and $3.9 billion in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Wildfire risk management ($1.5 billion national / $1.1 billion rural annually) would create 49,200 rural jobs and $3.3 billion in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Tree restoration on federal lands ($445 million national / $350 million rural annually) would support 9,200 rural jobs and $474 million in rural value added.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In absolute terms, California, Texas, New Mexico, Missouri, and Wyoming are the states that stand to gain the most in terms of rural job creation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-11","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The analysis suggests that every $1 million invested in the new climate economy pathways would generate 17.5 jobs and $1.5 million in value added within rural economies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wri-001773#insight-12","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","energy efficiency","Grid modernization","environmental remediation","reforestation","agroforestry","carbon sequestration","climate finance","just transition"],"geography_discussed":["California","Texas","New Mexico","Missouri","Wyoming"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["economic impact analysis","policy assessment","input-output modeling"]},{"id":"bc3res-000133","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/bc3res-000133","title":"Local air pollution and global climate change taxes: a distributional analysis","publisher":{"name":"Basque Centre for Climate Change","organization":"basque-centre-for-climate-change"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2014-02","source_url":"https://www.bc3research.org/h6T8Uy8Nm4gFs0O/201402190342081652526829.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study finds that taxes on local air pollutants are more regressive than those on climate change pollutants because they increase the prices of basic necessities, such as food and electricity, which occupy a larger share of low-income household budgets. While a CO2 tax was found to be nearly proportional across income deciles, the LAP tax disproportionately affected the poorest households. Revenue recycling through reduced social security contributions improved overall economic efficiency but tended to worsen the distributional equity, particularly for the GCC tax scenario.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Taxes on local air pollutants (LAP) are more regressive than taxes on global climate change (GCC) pollutants because the goods they implicitly tax have a higher weight in the consumption baskets of low-income groups.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The GCC tax, based on a rate of €25 per ton of carbon, is found to be almost perfectly proportional, with welfare losses of approximately 0.8% across all expenditure deciles.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The LAP tax causes a higher average welfare loss than the GCC tax, with the poorest households losing approximately 1.2% of welfare compared to 0.9% for the richest households.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The regressivity of the LAP tax is primarily driven by its impact on the food sector, as it increases food prices more than the GCC tax does, and low-income households spend a larger proportion of their income on food.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Revenue recycling via a reduction in social security contributions paid by employers increases overall fiscal efficiency and reduces welfare loss for all groups, but it makes the tax system more regressive.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Energy-intensive sectors, specifically electricity, water, and gas production, experience the highest price increases under both tax scenarios, with increases exceeding 7.5%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000133#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon tax","carbon dioxide emissions","Green ammonia"],"geography_discussed":["Denmark","Sweden","Finland","France"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["distributional analysis","micro-simulation","input-output modeling"]}]}