{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["financial feasibility study"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'financial feasibility study' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":4,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=financial+feasibility+study","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"rmi-000976","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/rmi-000976","title":"Innovative Funding for Sustainable Aviation Fuel at U.S. Airports","publisher":{"name":"RMI","organization":"rmi"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2017-07","source_url":"https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2017/07/RMI_Sustainable_Aviation_Innovative_Funding_SAF_2017.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies a significant price gap between sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and conventional jet fuel as the primary barrier to adoption. It proposes that U.S. airports, specifically the Port of Seattle at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, can overcome this by funding 'co-benefits'—such as air quality improvements and greenhouse gas reductions—rather than the fuel commodity itself. The authors evaluate 14 funding mechanisms and recommend a portfolio including corporate support, port taxing authority, general non-aeronautical revenue, and airline agreements to meet an estimated $6 million annual cost for a 1% SAF blend. Additionally, the report explores infrastructure financing, noting that long-term co-benefit procurement contracts can de-risk private investment in regional SAF production.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The primary obstacle to the large-scale adoption of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is the price premium over conventional jet fuel, which was approximately three times the cost of fossil-based fuel at the time of the report.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"U.S. airports are legally prohibited from paying for aircraft fuel as a commodity for private firms, but they can fund 'co-benefits,' which include greenhouse gas reductions, direct air quality benefits, and regional economic development.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Implementing a 1% airport-wide blend of SAF at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport would reduce CO2 emissions by approximately 23,300 to 31,000 metric tons annually on a life-cycle basis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report recommends a portfolio of four primary funding mechanisms to cover the estimated $6 million annual premium for a 1% SAF blend at Sea-Tac: Corporate Support ($1M–$2.5M), Use of General Non-Aeronautical Revenue ($1M–$4M), Airline Agreements ($380K–$2.3M), and Port Taxing Authority ($360K–$720K).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To incentivize regional SAF production infrastructure, the most effective airport action is the procurement of SAF co-benefits through medium-to-long-term contracts, which reduces risk for private sector investors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies several federal bioenergy incentives available for SAF infrastructure, including USDA Section 9003 loan guarantees (up to $250 million) and the DOE Section 1703 Loan Program for innovative clean energy technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Port of Seattle has limited legal authority to fund production facilities but can use project finance—such as General Obligation Bonds, Port Revenue Bonds, or Green Bonds—for on-airport blending and storage infrastructure.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"rmi-000976#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Sustainable Aviation Fuel","decarbonization","climate finance","greenhouse gas emissions","air quality","biofuel","climate bond","carbon offset"],"geography_discussed":["Washington","Norway","Sweden","California","Oregon"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy assessment","financial feasibility study"]},{"id":"foei-000566","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000566","title":"LA REVOLUCION ENERGETICA ES POSIBLE","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"es","date_published":"2015","source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/foe-energy-revolution-reportSUMMARY-ES-web.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report asserts that the combined fortunes of the world's wealthiest individuals could fund a total transition to renewable energy in the Global South by 2030. It estimates that $5.15 trillion is required to meet the energy demands of Africa, Latin America, and non-OECD Asia (excluding India and China). The authors argue that the energy transition must go beyond substituting fuel sources to include democratic ownership of resources and the dismantling of corporate power to address the intersecting crises of climate change and extreme inequality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The financial resources to fund a total renewable energy transition in Africa, Latin America, and most of Asia by 2030 exist, as the combined fortunes of the 782 wealthiest people on the planet total approximately $5.1 trillion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To achieve 100% renewable electricity in the most affected and least responsible regions of the developing world by 2030, an additional investment of $5.148 trillion is required.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A global transition to 100% renewable energy by 2050 would result in fuel savings of $42 trillion, meaning the additional investment costs for renewable infrastructure would be recovered through these savings over time.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In the analyzed regions of the Global South, between 62% and 88% of energy could be supplied by a combination of wind turbines, solar PV, concentrated solar power (CSP) with thermal storage, and other short-term storage like batteries and pumped hydro.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The remaining energy needs in these regions would be met by existing hydroelectric dams, geothermal energy in accessible areas, and minimal amounts of agro/bioenergy (2-4%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies a critical lack of political will to implement this transformation, evidenced by the weak emission reduction promises made by wealthy developed nations prior to the Paris climate negotiations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000566#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","climate finance","energy transition","photovoltaics","wind power","geothermal energy","hydroelectricity","bioenergy","energy storage","energy efficiency","climate justice","fossil fuel subsidy","carbon dioxide emissions"],"geography_discussed":["World","India","People's Republic of China"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["financial feasibility study","policy recommendation"]},{"id":"clipolin-000464","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/clipolin-000464","title":"Developing a Guarantee Instrument to Catalyze Renewable Energy Investment in Indonesia","publisher":{"name":"Climate Policy Initiative","organization":"climate-policy-initiative"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Developing-a-Guarantee-Instrument-to-Catalyze-Renewable-Energy-Investment-in-Indonesia.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report identifies significant barriers to renewable energy investment in Indonesia, including high upfront capital requirements and a lack of long-term debt financing from local banks. While ten organizations provide 13 guarantee products in the Indonesian market, none specifically target the renewable energy sector. The analysis argues that a tailored credit guarantee, potentially developed by PT SMI, could address security gaps for small developers and improve the risk-return profile of projects. However, implementation faces challenges such as competition from lower-cost corporate guarantees and the 'first demand' requirements of financial institutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Indonesia requires an estimated USD 125 billion in investment by 2025 to meet its clean energy mix targets, but private investment remains insufficient.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Several systemic barriers hinder private investment in Indonesian renewables, including unfavorable policies that skew risk-return profiles, high upfront capital costs, and a lack of long-term debt financing because local banks rely on short-term deposits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The current guarantee landscape in Indonesia consists of ten providers offering 13 products, but there is a total absence of instruments specifically focused on the renewable energy sector.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A dedicated credit guarantee for renewable energy could catalyze the market by bridging the security gap for small developers with insufficient balance sheets and improving project risk profiles to attract local bank funding.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (SMI) is well-positioned to develop these instruments due to its AAA local credit rating, ability to raise low-cost funds, and access to international development finance partners.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Effective implementation of a guarantee instrument in Indonesia faces four primary challenges: competition from cheaper shareholder/corporate guarantees, the 'first demand' reimbursement requirements of banks, limited guarantor involvement in recovery proceedings during defaults, and low awareness among financial institutions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"clipolin-000464#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","climate finance","risk reduction","project finance"],"geography_discussed":["India","Thailand","Philippines","Vietnam"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy analysis","financial feasibility study"]},{"id":"foei-000567","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/foei-000567","title":"ÉXIGEONS LA JUSTICE CLIMATIQUE","publisher":{"name":"Friends of the Earth International","organization":"friends-of-the-earth-international"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"fr","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/foe-energy-revolution-reportSUMMARY-FR-web.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"Friends of the Earth International asserts that a 100% renewable energy transition for the Global South is financially feasible, noting that the wealth of the world's richest individuals could cover the required investments. The report calculates that 5,146 billion US dollars are needed by 2030 to power Africa, Latin America, and non-OECD Asian countries (excluding India and China) with renewables. It advocates for a 'revolution of the energy' that moves beyond simple fuel switching to include democratic control of resources, the elimination of fossil fuel subsidies, and the repayment of 'climate debt' by developed nations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The financial resources required for a total energy transition in the Global South are small compared to the wealth of the world's richest individuals. The personal wealth of the 782 richest people, totaling nearly 5,149 billion US dollars, could fund 100% renewable energy for Africa, Latin America, and most Asian countries by 2030. Specifically, the wealth of the 53 richest people alone could power all of Africa with 100% renewable energy by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The estimated additional investment cost to achieve 100% renewable electricity in Africa, Latin America, and 'other Asia' (non-OECD countries excluding India and China) by 2030 is 5,146 billion US dollars.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A transition to 100% renewable electricity globally by 2050 could result in fuel cost savings of 42 trillion US dollars, which would offset the initial additional investment costs over the long term.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed energy model for the Global South suggests that 62-88% of energy could come from a combination of wind, solar PV, concentrated solar power (CSP) with thermal storage, and short-term storage like batteries and pumped hydro. The remaining energy would be supplied by geothermal sources, existing hydroelectric dams (with no new dams built), and minimal bioenergy (2-4%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document argues that a just energy transition must be based on specific principles: treating energy access as a fundamental human right, ensuring direct democratic control, using locally appropriate technologies, reducing waste and consumption, and guaranteeing the right to free, prior, and informed consent for communities to prevent land grabbing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"To initiate the energy revolution, the report recommends ending fossil fuel subsidies, stopping new polluting energy projects, reducing energy dependence in developed countries, and requiring developed governments to pay 'climate debt' through unconditional investments in developing countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"foei-000567#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["renewable energy","climate finance","energy transition","climate justice","fossil fuel subsidy","photovoltaics","wind power","geothermal energy","hydroelectricity","bioenergy","energy efficiency","energy access"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["financial feasibility study","policy recommendation"]}]}