{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["financial cost-benefit analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'financial cost-benefit analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=financial+cost-benefit+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"cer-000335","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cer-000335","title":"PROPOSED RELEASE OF UNABATED SULPHUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM KUSILE COAL-FIRED POWER STATION","publisher":{"name":"Centre for Environmental Rights","organization":"centre-for-environmental-rights"},"document_type":"statement","language":"en","date_published":"2023-03-09","source_url":"https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Annexure-1-LAC-Letter-in-response-to-proposed-Kusile-FGD-Stack-Bypass.-9-March-2023.pdf?x21779","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The Life After Coal Campaign opposes Eskom's plan to install temporary bypass stacks at the Kusile power station, which would allow unabated SO2 emissions to restore generating capacity. The campaign argues that this proposal poses grave risks to human health, potentially causing up to 1,362 air pollution-related deaths and R25 billion in societal costs over 36 months at high utilization. They challenge the claim that the bypass will restore 2,160 MW, noting the plant's historical 33% capacity performance. Instead of the bypass, the campaign proposes investing the funds into solar PV and wind installations to accelerate the coal phase-out.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Eskom proposes a temporary solution to bypass the flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) plant at Kusile power station following the October 2022 collapse of a 9-metre diameter flue duct, which rendered units 2 and 3 inoperable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The proposed bypass of SO2 pollution abatement equipment is projected to cause significant health impacts and deaths. Based on a report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), the number of air pollution-related deaths would range from 195 (low utilisation for 13 months) to 1,362 (high utilisation for 36 months).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The societal costs associated with the health impacts of the bypass are estimated between R3.6 billion (low utilisation, 13 months) and R25 billion (high utilisation, 36 months).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The campaign disputes Eskom's claim that the bypass will restore 2,160 MW of capacity, noting that prior to the failure in 2022, the plant operated at approximately 33% capacity, which is equivalent to 700 MW.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The bypass would result in an estimated 6-fold increase in SO2 emissions, with total excess emissions ranging from 87,000 to 610,000 tonnes depending on the scenario.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Life After Coal Campaign proposes that the funds intended for the bypass stacks be redirected toward a large rooftop solar PV programme in Mpumalanga, including residential and industrial installations, to accelerate the coal phase-out.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cer-000335#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["coal-fired power station","air quality","Coal phase-out","photovoltaics","just transition"],"geography_discussed":["Highveld","Vaal Triangle"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["health impact assessment","financial cost-benefit analysis","legal and regulatory review"]}]}