{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["experimental survey"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'experimental survey' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=experimental+survey","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"commyale-000124","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commyale-000124","title":"A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change","publisher":{"name":"Yale Program on Climate Change Communication","organization":"yale-program-on-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2012-08-15","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/a-public-health-frame-arouses-hopeful-emotions-about-climate-change/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A survey of 1,127 U.S. residents found that a public health frame is the most effective at eliciting emotional reactions that support climate change mitigation and adaptation across various audience segments. Conversely, a national security frame may cause a 'boomerang' effect, triggering anger among those already doubtful or dismissive of climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000124#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Among the three experimental frames tested, the public health focus was the most effective at producing emotional responses that align with support for climate change adaptation and mitigation across all audience segments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000124#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The national security frame may be counterproductive for individuals who are already dismissive or doubtful of climate change, as it can trigger unintended feelings of anger.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commyale-000124#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change communication","public health","national security","climate change mitigation","climate change adaptation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["experimental survey"]},{"id":"commgmu-000056","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commgmu-000056","title":"A Public Health Frame Arouses Hopeful Emotions about Climate Change","publisher":{"name":"Center for Climate Change Communication","organization":"center-for-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2012-06-30","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/all/a-public-health-frame-arouses-hopeful-emptions-about-climate-change/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"A study of U.S. residents found that a public health frame is the most effective at eliciting emotional reactions that support climate change mitigation and adaptation, while a national security frame may cause anger among skeptical audiences.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000056#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Among various audience segments, framing climate change through a public health lens was the most effective method for triggering emotional responses that align with support for adaptation and mitigation efforts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000056#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Using a national security frame may produce a 'boomerang' effect for people who are already dismissive or doubtful of climate change, leading to unintended feelings of anger.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000056#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change communication","public health","national security","climate change mitigation","climate change adaptation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["experimental survey"]}]}