{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["experimental evidence"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'experimental evidence' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":3,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=experimental+evidence","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"ipie-000107","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/ipie-000107","title":"Respuesta a la desinformación generada por inteligencia artificial generativa Resultados de un metaanálisis de la evidencia científica","publisher":{"name":"International Panel on the Information Environment","organization":"international-panel-on-the-information-environment"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"es","date_published":"2026","source_url":"https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/643ecb10be528d2c1da863cb/6a3b8d4bd9700c3d09dad036_SFP%20SPANISH%20FINAL.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that generative AI-produced textual misinformation currently poses a higher persuasion risk than visual misinformation. It identifies preventive corrective information as the most consistently effective intervention for reducing the perceived credibility of such content, while content labeling shows promising but inconsistent results depending on design. The analysis highlights a significant global evidence gap, as most research is concentrated in high-income, English-speaking countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Textual misinformation generated by generative AI is currently perceived as more accurate, credible, or plausible than true information, posing a more immediate persuasive risk than visual misinformation such as deepfakes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Preventive corrective information—such as educational warnings or reminders provided before exposure—consistently reduces the perceived accuracy, credibility, or acceptance of generative AI misinformation with a small to moderate effect size.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Content labeling can reduce the perceived credibility of misleading generative AI information, but its effectiveness varies significantly based on design, wording, presentation, and the source of the label.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a substantial global knowledge gap because the current evidence base is heavily concentrated on high-income, English-speaking countries, leaving many regions, languages, and political systems under-researched.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The meta-analysis was based on 60 effect estimates from randomized controlled trials extracted from 24 peer-reviewed publications involving 33,801 people, published between 2018 and 2025.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"ipie-000107#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":["Austria","Germany","Netherlands","South Korea","United Kingdom","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["meta-analysis","experimental evidence","randomized controlled trials"]},{"id":"sei-002061","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-002061","title":"Restoration of blanket bog vegetation for biodiversity, carbon sequestration and water regulation","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020-03-27","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/restoration-of-heather-blanket-bog/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study compared rotational burning, mowing, and uncut controls in UK blanket bogs to determine their effects on peat-forming vegetation and ecosystem services. Findings indicate that mowing generally better supports 'active' bog communities and improves water table levels and flood alleviation, though it may increase phosphorus export. Burning was found to be the least beneficial for supporting active vegetation, and both burning and mowing caused plots to switch from net carbon sinks to net sources immediately following management.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Rotational burning was identified as the least effective management method for promoting 'active' bog vegetation, especially at the driest study site, although it resulted in high surface carbon accumulation due to charcoal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Mowing encourages the re-establishment of typical bog communities and increases peat moisture and water tables, which benefits cranefly and bird populations in dry conditions. Additionally, mowing reduced stream flow at two sites, suggesting potential for downstream flood alleviation during heavy rainfall.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Mowing may have negative environmental trade-offs, including increased phosphorus export into streams due to brash decomposition—which could lead to reservoir eutrophication—and the encouragement of sedge vegetation that may negatively affect water quality and methane emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Both burning and mowing caused managed plots to transition from being net carbon sinks to net carbon sources. While active blanket bogs are long-term carbon sinks, they can emit significant methane through anaerobic decomposition, especially in warmer and wetter conditions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study concludes that monitoring of carbon storage, carbon fluxes, and greenhouse gas emissions must continue over at least one full management cycle, approximately 10 to 15 years, to accurately assess impacts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-002061#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["carbon sequestration","methane emissions","greenhouse gas emissions","peatland","biodiversity"],"geography_discussed":["England"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["experimental evidence","comparative study"]},{"id":"commgmu-000016","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/commgmu-000016","title":"The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence","publisher":{"name":"Center for Climate Change Communication","organization":"center-for-climate-change-communication"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2015-02-25","source_url":"https://climatecommunication.gmu.edu/all/the-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change-as-a-gateway-belief/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research demonstrates that perceived scientific agreement acts as a gateway belief, where increasing public awareness of the scientific consensus causally leads to higher beliefs that climate change is occurring, human-caused, and a threat, which subsequently increases support for public action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000016#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"There is a widespread public misunderstanding regarding the extent of the scientific consensus on human-caused climate change, both within the United States and internationally.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000016#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Experimental data from 1,104 participants indicates that increasing public perceptions of scientific consensus is significantly and causally linked to an increase in the belief that climate change is happening, human-caused, and a worrisome threat.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000016#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Changes in beliefs regarding the reality and cause of climate change, triggered by perceptions of scientific agreement, are predictive of increased support for public action.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"commgmu-000016#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate policy"],"geography_discussed":["World"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["experimental evidence"]}]}