{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["empirical investigation"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'empirical investigation' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=empirical+investigation","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001121","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001121","title":"Resilience - governance and in/security in interconnected societies","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2016","source_url":"https://www.prio.org/publications/9010","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that in interconnected societies, security is no longer a state of protection but an emergent process of activity. It posits that resilience has become a way of governing where insecurity is accepted as unavoidable, shifting the focus from predicting risk to developing a 'know-how-to-respond'. The author highlights the role of digital technologies in creating 'interconnection ecosystems' and facilitating self-organization through the 'crowd', while distinguishing between resilience as a general principle and resilience as a prescriptive program of control.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Resilience is framed as a universal response to shocks because insecurity is viewed as an unavoidable result of radical relationality, meaning it can no longer be excluded from society using risk technologies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The governance of security has shifted from an attempt to make future disruptions known via risk assessment to a focus on 'know-how-to-respond', with algorithmic analysis and patterns serving as the new epistemological authority for planning responses.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In an interconnected world, security is redefined as an emergent process or activity rather than a state of being protected, and can only be established after a disruption has occurred.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Digital technologies transform emergency management by mediating the relationship between planners, recipients of help, and the 'crowd', while the internet is viewed as an 'interconnection ecosystem' that justifies resilience-based governance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author proposes a distinction between resilience as a 'principle', which allows for some restricted agency in how an insecure subject enacts security, and resilience as a 'program', which acts as a form of control over the conduct of disaster populations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001121#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["governance","risk management"],"geography_discussed":["Germany"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["conceptual analysis","empirical investigation"]}]}