{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["cross-national time-series analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'cross-national time-series analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=cross-national+time-series+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001799","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001799","title":"The Illusion of Inclusion: Assessing the Effects and Gendered Implications of Power Sharing","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2021-06","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/c7b34695-362f-46a9-947a-56be63d1a13f/The Illusion of Inclusion Assessing the Effects and Gendered Implications of Power Sharing.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study finds that while inclusive power-sharing arrangements positively affect the proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments, they do not statistically increase women's empowerment in civil society, including their political participation, civil liberties, and civil society engagement. Using a country-year fixed effects model for 180 countries, the author argues that such institutions often provide an 'illusion of inclusion' by focusing on elite-level representation while failing to address grassroots gender inequalities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Inclusive power-sharing arrangements have a statistically significant positive effect on the proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is no statistical evidence that inclusive power-sharing arrangements increase women's empowerment in civil society, specifically regarding political participation, civil liberties, or civil society engagement.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"High levels of battle-related deaths and civil conflict are associated with lower levels of female inclusion and women's empowerment.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The implementation of inclusive power-sharing after the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 in 2000 did not show a statistically significant additional effect on women's inclusion.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Economic factors, specifically GDP per capita and petroleum production per capita, did not show a statistically significant relationship with female inclusion or women's empowerment in the fixed effects models.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author argues that power-sharing models often prioritize ethno-national identities, which can lead to the 'exclusion amid inclusion' dilemma where women and other non-elite groups are marginalized.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001799#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Lebanon","Burundi","Bosnia and Herzegovina","Kenya","Zimbabwe","South Africa","Colombia"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative analysis","fixed effects regression","cross-national time-series analysis"]},{"id":"prio-001377","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001377","title":"Famine Mortality, Rational Political Inactivity, and International Food Aid","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2008-05","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1e524d78-350f-47f3-a29e-77093f23ba52/Famine Mortality Rational Political Inactivity and International Food Aid.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The authors argue that famine mortality is a result of a political support maximization calculus where governments weigh the costs of action against the costs of inaction. While democracies generally have lower famine mortality than autocracies, the study finds that both regime types can experience famine deaths. The research demonstrates that international food aid is most effective at reducing mortality when a large share of the population is affected, and that democratic governments respond more elastically to this combination than autocratic ones, which are more likely to divert aid to a small elite.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Governmental inaction during a famine can be a rational outcome of a political support maximization calculus, occurring when the political costs of taking action exceed the costs of remaining inactive.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Contrary to Amartya Sen's claim that functioning multiparty democracies prevent substantial famine mortality, the authors argue that famine mortality is possible in democracies, although it is likely to be lower than in autocracies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Democratic governments are more likely to implement policies that benefit all affected people, whereas autocratic governments tend to use targeted transfers to protect a small elite, leaving the broader population vulnerable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"International food aid reduces the political trade-off for governments by allowing them to gain support from affected populations without incurring immediate economic costs for unaffected citizens.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Autocratic regimes are more prone to misusing international food aid, often diverting it to the military or government officials or selling it on black markets for the benefit of the elite.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Empirical analysis of 130 developing countries from 1972 to 2000 shows that the life-saving effect of international food aid is stronger when a larger share of the total population is affected by the famine.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Democratic governments respond more elastically to the simultaneous availability of international food aid and a high proportion of affected citizens compared to autocratic governments.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study identifies that civil wars tend to increase famine mortality, while higher per capita income and higher population density significantly reduce the number of famine deaths.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001377#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["food security","developing country"],"geography_discussed":["India","Sudan","North Korea","Bihar"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["political theory","cross-national time-series analysis","negative binomial regression","Monte Carlo study"]}]}