{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["cross-case synthesis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'cross-case synthesis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=cross-case+synthesis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-000536","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000536","title":"Co-designing soft climate adaptation","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2026-02-18","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/co-designing-soft-climate-adaptation/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study evaluates a structured co-creation process across four European cities to develop soft climate adaptation measures. It identifies four recurring measure typologies and highlights that effective engagement depends on continuity, tailored formats, and accessible facilitation, while noting constraints in resources and representation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000536#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The co-creation process across the four pilot regions resulted in the identification of four recurring soft adaptation measure typologies, although the specific design features of these measures were influenced by local institutional, socio-cultural, physical, and climatic conditions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000536#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Effective outcomes in the engagement process were driven by three main factors: the use of socio-culturally tailored formats, facilitation that reduced barriers to participation, and continuity to allow for iteration and trust-building.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000536#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The study identified several primary constraints to the co-creation process, including gaps in representation and coordination, limitations in time and resources, and issues regarding the accessibility of communication.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000536#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change adaptation","public participation","climate justice"],"geography_discussed":["Aragon","Dresden","Malmö","Rome"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["cross-case synthesis"]}]}