{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["corporate performance assessment"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'corporate performance assessment' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":5,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=corporate+performance+assessment","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"chanmar-000265","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000265","title":"Running Latte: Slow Progress on Methane in the Dairy and Coffee Industry","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2025","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Running-Latte.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that the dairy and coffee house industries are failing to address methane emissions with urgency, with 18 out of 20 analysed companies scoring less than half of the available points in a performance assessment. While methane's climate impact is widely recognised, most companies lack specific reduction targets, credible action plans, or transparent, disaggregated reporting of methane emissions (CH4). Danone was the only company to set both a methane-specific target and an aligned detailed plan. The report highlights a significant gap in corporate accountability, noting that even members of the Dairy Methane Action Alliance (DMAA) generally achieve only about a third of the total possible score, though they outperform non-members.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The vast majority of analysed companies show poor overall performance on methane action, with 18 out of 20 scoring less than 50% of the total available points. All assessed coffee house companies ranked in the bottom nine, with Dunkin' scoring zero points.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Methane accounting and reporting are largely opaque; only six companies account for methane separately from CO2-equivalent figures, and only Bel Group reports methane in a fully disaggregated way (CH4).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Methane-specific reduction targets and action plans are nearly absent across the sector. Danone is the only company to have both a methane-specific target (30% reduction in fresh milk emissions by 2030) and an aligned detailed plan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Members of the Dairy Methane Action Alliance (DMAA) generally outperform non-members, scoring an average of 34.7 points compared to 22.7. However, only three of the eight DMAA members have set any form of methane reduction target or published an action plan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies a significant disconnect between the scale of methane's impact and corporate action, noting that methane is responsible for nearly half of the total global surface temperature rise since 1750, yet 70% of the analysed companies have set no methane, livestock, or dairy reduction targets.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000265#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["methane emissions","GHG Protocol","Scope 3"],"geography_discussed":["European Union","United States","Switzerland","Brazil"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate performance assessment","policy analysis"]},{"id":"chanmar-000328","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000328","title":"Under Wraps? Hvad europæiske supermarkeder ikke fortæller om plastik","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"da","date_published":"2022-05","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Underwraps-Danish-ExecSum.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that European supermarkets generally perform poorly in addressing the plastic crisis, with an average score of 13.1% across transparency, commitments, and policy support. While some UK and Irish retailers score higher, most companies lack basic data on their plastic footprints and prioritize recyclability over waste prevention. The analysis highlights a tendency toward 'greenwashing,' where retailers promote voluntary pledges or flawed collection schemes instead of systemic changes or supporting binding legislation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"European supermarkets demonstrate a very low overall performance in addressing plastic pollution, achieving an average score of only 13.1% out of 100 across the categories of transparency and performance, commitments, and support for government policy.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Transparency regarding plastic footprints is critically low, with 82% of evaluated companies failing to provide basic information on their plastic footprints, which undermines the validity of any quantitative commitments they may have.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Retailers prioritize recyclability over the waste hierarchy's higher priorities of prevention and reuse. No company scored above 40% for packaging reusability, with an average score of 5.1%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Support for government policy is minimal, with an average score of 12.7%. Only five retailers (Aldi Ireland, Aldi Denmark, Aldi UK, Lidl UK, and BioCoop France) strongly support a comprehensive deposit return system (DRS) for all beverage packaging.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies 'greenwashing' practices, noting that some UK supermarkets established flexible plastic collection schemes that resulted in waste being exported to third countries like Turkey, where it was illegally dumped and burned.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000328#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["plastic pollution","circular economy","recycling","greenwashing","environmental regulation"],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","France","Denmark","Ireland","Germany","Spain","Czech Republic","Ukraine","Estonia","Austria","Belgium","Netherlands","Portugal","Turkey"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate performance assessment","policy analysis"]},{"id":"chanmar-000331","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000331","title":"Numa embrulhada: O que os supermercados da Europa não nos estão a dizer sobre o plástico","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"pt","date_published":"2022-05","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Underwraps-Portuguese-ExecSum.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that European supermarkets generally exhibit low ambition and transparency regarding plastic pollution, with a global average score of only 13.1%. Most retailers prioritize recyclability over waste prevention and reuse, often relying on voluntary commitments and 'greenwashing' tactics rather than systemic changes. While some UK and Irish retailers score higher, there is significant inconsistency within international groups, and very few support binding government targets or comprehensive deposit return systems.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"European supermarkets show very poor overall performance in addressing plastic pollution, with a global average score of 13.1 out of 100. Only two companies exceeded 60%: Aldi in the UK (65.3%) and Aldi in Ireland (61%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Transparency and performance are critically low, with 82% of evaluated companies failing to provide basic information on their plastic footprint. The average score for packaging reusability was only 5.1%, and no company scored above 40% in this specific category.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Retailers demonstrate low ambition in their commitments to reduce plastic, averaging 17.1% of available points. Specifically, commitments to increase refillable or reusable packaging were the weakest, scoring an average of only 3.3%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Support for government policy is minimal, with an average score of 12.7%. Only five retailers (Aldi Ireland, Aldi Denmark, Aldi UK, Lidl UK, and BioCoop in France) strongly support a comprehensive deposit return system (SDR) that includes all materials and capacities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant disparity in performance by country and within international corporate groups. UK retailers led with an average of 39.6%, while those in Estonia averaged 0.9%. For example, Aldi Süd scored over 60% in the UK and Ireland but only 11% in Austria (operating as Hofer).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies 'greenwashing' practices, noting that some supermarkets attempt to recycle non-recyclable plastics. In the UK, Tesco and Sainsbury’s used flexible plastic collection boxes, but the waste was exported to Turkey, where it was reportedly dumped and incinerated illegally.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000331#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["plastic pollution","recycling","greenwashing","single-use plastic","circular economy"],"geography_discussed":["United Kingdom","France","Ireland","Spain","Czech Republic","Ukraine","Estonia","Austria","Germany","Denmark","Belgium","Netherlands","Turkey","Portugal"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate performance assessment","policy analysis","comparative study"]},{"id":"chanmar-000107","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/chanmar-000107","title":"Daily Bread","publisher":{"name":"Changing Markets Foundation","organization":"changing-markets-foundation"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2019-05","source_url":"https://changingmarkets.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Daily_Bread_WEB.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that the vast majority of industrially produced breads and tortillas in Mexico fail to meet the minimum iron and zinc levels mandated by the NOM-247-SSA1-2008 regulation. Testing revealed that only 14% of bread products and 1.5% of tortilla products were adequately fortified. Furthermore, 84% of both product types were suspected of using elemental iron, a less-bioavailable source not recommended by the regulation or WHO guidelines. The report highlights a regulatory loophole where the law mandates fortification for flour producers but does not explicitly require food processors to procure and use that fortified flour. Major companies like Grupo Bimbo and Gruma were specifically analyzed, with Gruma's tested products failing to meet any minimum requirements for iron or zinc.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"A very small percentage of tested staple foods meet the legal minimums for iron and zinc: only 14% of bread products (6 out of 43) and 1.5% of tortilla products (1 out of 69) clearly met the mandated levels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The majority of tested products use elemental iron, which is less bioavailable and not recommended by the Mexican regulation or World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, particularly for nixtamalized maize flour.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant regulatory loophole because the current law (NOM-247-SSA1-2008) obligates flour producers to fortify but does not legally require food processors to procure or use that fortified flour for final products.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Testing of products from Gruma, a world leader in tortilla manufacturing, showed that none of the seven products tested met the minimum requirements for iron or zinc.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Grupo Bimbo's performance was also poor, with only one bread product and one tortilla product meeting the minimum iron and zinc standards across the brands tested.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies several other failures in the current regulation, including a lack of specified government agency for enforcement, no defined frequency for monitoring, and no public access to monitoring results.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Micronutrient deficiencies are a critical health issue in Mexico, with 90% of women lacking sufficient iron and 25% of adult men lacking sufficient zinc.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"chanmar-000107#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Mexico City","Puebla","Sonora"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["independent testing","regulatory analysis","corporate performance assessment"]},{"id":"wwf-000539","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/wwf-000539","title":"Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard","publisher":{"name":"WWF International","organization":"wwf-international"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2016-09","source_url":"https://www.worldwildlife.org/documents/344/4zjz1jdl92_po_scorecard_2016_final.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The 2016 Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard evaluates corporate adoption of RSPO-certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO). While many companies have joined the RSPO and increased CSPO use, a significant gap remains between high-level commitments and the use of physically segregated supply chains. The report highlights that while 77 companies committed to 100% CSPO by 2015, only 56 achieved this. It emphasizes the need for companies to move beyond 'book and claim' certificates toward segregated sourcing to effectively eliminate deforestation and habitat loss in producer regions like Indonesia and Malaysia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Of the 137 companies assessed, 107 reported having a public commitment to use certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO), but only 56 of the 77 companies that set a 2015 target for 100% CSPO actually met that goal.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"There is a significant reliance on the 'book and claim' system, which allows companies to support sustainable producers without ensuring the physical palm oil in their products is certified. Just under half of the CSPO used by reporting companies was bought through this system, and 17 companies relied on it for over 75% of their CSPO.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Progress toward physically segregated supply chains—which ensure uncertified oil is eliminated—is slow. Only 15% of the total palm oil used by the assessed brands in 2015 was segregated, and only three companies (Arnott’s, Danone, and Ferrero) used 100% segregated CSPO.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Corporate performance varies by sector, with food manufacturers progressing faster than personal care and detergent producers. This is attributed to the higher availability of certified crude palm oil (CPO) compared to the palm kernel oil (PKO) and derivatives used in personal care products.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Geographic analysis shows that while European, North American, and Australian brands have made significant strides, progress in Asian markets remains low. The report argues that future demand for CSPO must come from expanding markets in China, India, Indonesia, and Malaysia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Many multinational companies apply sustainability commitments inconsistently across different regions. For example, L’Oréal's commitment to CSPO appears limited to France, and Tesco's commitment is limited to the UK.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Retailers often limit their CSPO commitments to their own-brand products, excluding private labels they sell, which the report describes as 'half promises'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite corporate progress, deforestation continues at an alarming rate in producer regions. The report cites Tesso Nilo National Park in Sumatra as an example where illegal palm oil production has caused the forest to almost vanish due to systemic governance failures.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The report identifies a lack of government support and enforcement in Indonesia and Malaysia as a major barrier. It notes that Malaysian authorities have blocked the RSPO from publishing maps of landbanks controlled by large industry players.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Very few companies are supporting independent smallholders through the purchase of certificates. While 23 brands claimed to do so, GreenPalm records indicate only Unilever and Johnson & Johnson actually purchased independent smallholder certificates in 2015.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"wwf-000539#insight-10","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["deforestation","greenhouse gas emissions","biodiversity loss","Global supply chain governance","land-use planning","environmental governance"],"geography_discussed":["Indonesia","Malaysia","Australia","Canada","Europe","India","Japan","United States","Sumatra","Tesso Nilo National Park","People's Republic of China","Sabah","Central Kalimantan"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["corporate performance assessment","supply chain analysis","policy review"]}]}