{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["corporate evaluation criteria"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'corporate evaluation criteria' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=corporate+evaluation+criteria","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"reclfin-000575","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/reclfin-000575","title":"HOW TO EXIT COAL: 10 Criteria for Evaluating Corporate Coal Phase-Out Plans","publisher":{"name":"Reclaim Finance","organization":"reclaim-finance"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2021-10","source_url":"https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Briefing_HowToExitCoal_ReclaimFinanceUrgewald_October2021-min.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that to meet the 1.5°C climate goal, new coal infrastructure must stop immediately and most existing plants must be retired by 2030. It provides a framework for financial institutions to assess corporate coal exit plans, emphasizing that credible plans must include facility-by-facility closure dates, a prohibition on selling assets to new owners, and a ban on converting plants to other fossil fuels or biomass. The briefing also highlights the necessity of funded just transition plans and the cessation of anti-climate lobbying and legal challenges via investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"To align with the 1.5°C target, all coal expansion plans must be cancelled, and 80% of the global coal fleet must be closed by 2030, with all facilities globally closed by 2040. Specifically, all thermal coal facilities in the OECD, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union must be closed by 2030.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Credible phase-out plans must specify facility-by-facility closure dates to allow for monitoring and the implementation of just transition plans. The document notes that as of the 2021 Global Coal Exit List, no coal company had produced an asset-by-asset closure timetable.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Coal facilities must be permanently closed rather than sold to new owners, as divestment through sale does not result in actual emission cuts and may leave environmental liabilities unaddressed. Examples include ENGIE selling plants in Brazil and Anglo American spinning off coal assets into Thungela Resources.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Coal plants should not be converted to fossil gas, biomass, or fossil-based hydrogen. The document argues that gas conversion risks creating new stranded assets, biomass can increase CO2 emissions per KWh and destroy forests, and 'blue' hydrogen has a greenhouse gas footprint more than 20% higher than burning natural gas or coal for heat.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Claims regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofitting should not be used to delay closures, as these projects have proven to be expensive and technically unreliable. The IEA's 2021 net-zero pathway projects coal with CCS in 2030 will equal only 3% of current power sector coal consumption.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Closures must be accompanied by funded just transition plans that address worker obligations and environmental remediation, such as cleaning up toxic coal ash ponds and rehabilitating old mine sites.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Companies must stop all anti-climate lobbying and pledge not to use investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, such as the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to challenge government coal exit policies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A Science-Based Target (SBTi) or net-zero commitment is not a sufficient substitute for a detailed coal phase-out plan because the SBTi does not currently require companies to set a specific coal phase-out date or adopt 1.5°C pathways.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000575#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Coal phase-out","climate finance","just transition","carbon capture and storage","bioenergy","natural gas","hydrogen","Paris Agreement"],"geography_discussed":["OECD","Eastern Europe","Former Soviet Union","Germany","Russia","Japan","Turkey","United States","United Kingdom","European Union","People's Republic of China","Brazil","Chile","Portugal","Argentina","South Africa","Netherlands"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy framework","corporate evaluation criteria"]},{"id":"reclfin-000633","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/reclfin-000633","title":"HOW TO EXIT COAL: 10 Criteria for Evaluating Corporate Coal Phase-Out Plans","publisher":{"name":"Reclaim Finance","organization":"reclaim-finance"},"document_type":"briefing","language":"en","date_published":"2021-10","source_url":"https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/How-to-exit-coal-briefing.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that to meet the 1.5°C climate goal, the global coal industry must be phased out rapidly, with 80% of the global fleet and all facilities in the OECD, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union closed by 2030. It provides financial institutions with a ten-point framework to assess corporate phase-out plans, emphasizing that plans must include facility-by-facility closure dates, prohibit the sale of assets to new owners, and forbid conversion to fossil gas, biomass, or fossil-based hydrogen. The briefing also warns against using carbon capture and storage (CCS) or Science-Based Targets (SBTi) as substitutes for concrete closure plans and insists on funded just transition roadmaps and the cessation of anti-climate lobbying and investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"To align with the 1.5°C target, all coal expansion must cease immediately, and a significant majority of the global coal fleet must be retired by 2030, with total global closure by 2040. Specifically, all thermal coal facilities in the OECD, Eastern Europe, and the Former Soviet Union must be closed by 2030, and 80% of the global coal fleet must be closed by that same date.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Credible phase-out plans must ensure real emission reductions by requiring the actual closure of facilities rather than their sale to new owners, which the document notes does not result in emission cuts and may increase risks for local communities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The document argues that converting coal plants to fossil gas, biomass, or fossil-based hydrogen is unacceptable. Fossil gas has high indirect climate impacts from methane leakage, biomass can increase CO2 emissions per KWh and destroy forests, and fossil-based hydrogen (gray or blue) maintains a high carbon footprint.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Claims regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS) should not be used to delay closures, as the document describes CCS retrofits as 'expensive fiascos' that are technically and economically unviable in the foreseeable future.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Phase-out plans must be accompanied by funded just transition roadmaps that include environmental remediation, such as cleaning up toxic coal ash ponds and rehabilitating abandoned mine sites, as well as support for workers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Companies should pledge not to use investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms, such as the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), to sue governments for compensation over mandated coal phase-outs, as this creates a 'chilling effect' on climate legislation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A Science-Based Target (SBTi) or net-zero commitment is not a sufficient substitute for a credible coal phase-out plan because the SBTi does not currently require 1.5°C pathways or specific coal phase-out dates.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"reclfin-000633#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Coal phase-out","climate finance","just transition","carbon capture and storage","natural gas","biomass","hydrogen"],"geography_discussed":["OECD","Eastern Europe","Former Soviet Union","United States","United Kingdom","European Union","People's Republic of China","Chile","Portugal","Germany","Netherlands"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["policy framework","corporate evaluation criteria"]}]}