{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["conflict mapping"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'conflict mapping' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=conflict+mapping","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001171","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001171","title":"What Peace for Syria?","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2020","source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/1d6a8acd-2ef2-40c5-85c6-8aaa90985b15/5 2020 What Peace for Syria.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report analyzes the failure of diplomatic efforts in Syria, including the Geneva and Astana processes, and maps the fragmented nature of the Syrian Sunni opposition. It details how external actors—primarily Russia, Turkey, and Iran—have established spheres of influence and proxy networks that complicate a sustainable political transition. The authors argue that the peace process has been largely detached from the Syrian people, exacerbated by the rise of extremist groups, the Kurdish issue, and a severe economic crisis compounded by COVID-19.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The UN-led Geneva process failed to achieve a comprehensive settlement due to a power struggle between the West and Russia over the legitimacy of Bashar al-Assad, the inability of the Syrian opposition to unite, and the rise of the Islamic State.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Astana process shifted the peace process from an international problem to a local negotiation among 'guarantor powers' (Russia, Turkey, and Iran), effectively bypassing the Geneva talks and moving the discussion away from the removal of Bashar al-Assad.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Russia and Iran have secured the Assad regime's survival, with Russia dominating western coastal areas like Latakia and Tartus, while Iran and Hezbollah maintain influence through local Shiite proxies.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Turkey has transitioned from supporting proxies to direct military intervention, establishing four zones of control along the border and integrating opposition groups into the Syrian National Army (SNA) under the Syrian Interim Government (SIG).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Syrian Sunni opposition is deeply fractured into competing entities, including the internationally recognized but expatriate-led Syrian National Coalition (SNC), the Turkey-dependent Syrian Interim Government (SIG), and the HTS-linked Syrian Salvation Government (SSG) in Idlib.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Muslim Brotherhood of Syria, while influential in the early opposition and the National Council of Syria, failed to unify opposition groups or legitimize itself within Syria, often acting as a disrupting rather than unifying force.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Kurdish issue, specifically the autonomy of the PYD/YPG and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), creates a 'demarcation line' along the Euphrates and complicates relations between the US, Turkey, and Russia.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Syria is facing a severe economic and food crisis, with the Syrian pound devaluing by more than two-thirds by mid-2020, leading to the adoption of the Turkish lira in some areas and increased food insecurity for millions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Assad regime's 'national reconciliation' process is criticized as a tool for control rather than genuine peace, requiring applicants to provide detailed information on anti-government activities and rebel networks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001171#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Turkey","Russia","Iran","Idlib Governorate","Deir ez-Zor Governorate","Geneva","Astana","Vienna"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["geopolitical analysis","conflict mapping","policy evaluation"]},{"id":"iisd-001235","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-001235","title":"Conflict-sensitive Conservation: Field report from Queen Elizabeth National Park","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"report","language":"en","date_published":"2009","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/conflict_queen_elizabeth_park.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report details a December 2006 workshop used to test the first section of the CSC Manual, 'Assessing Conflict'. Participants identified and prioritised conflicts around Queen Elizabeth National Park (QENP), specifically focusing on pastoralist encroachment and policy implementation gaps. Using tools like Conflict Trees, Conflict Mapping, and Stakeholder Analysis, the workshop identified root causes—such as land scarcity and ethnic rivalry—and proposed entry points for conflict resolution and sensitivity strategies for the CARE REPA programme.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The prioritisation exercise identified 'competing land use conflicts' as the highest-ranked conflict category, followed by 'policy gaps and inconsistent implementation'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Analysis of pastoralist encroachment into the park revealed root causes including population pressure, limited land outside protected areas, and protracted ethnic conflicts between the Bakonzo and Basongora.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Policy failure conflicts are driven by a lack of local participation in national policy making, corruption, and institutional disputes, such as those between the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) and the Department for Fisheries and Resources over the Kazinga Channel.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Stakeholder analysis of the pastoralist encroachment conflict highlights a clash between the UWA's position that 'Encroachers should be resettled outside the PA' and the Basongora lobby group's claim that 'Ancestral land should be returned'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Proposed entry points for addressing pastoralist encroachment include promoting dialogue between communities and the UWA, supporting Problem Animal Management (PAM) initiatives, and advocating for land access issues with the central government.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"For policy-related conflicts, identified entry points include monitoring policy implementation to provide feedback to duty bearers and hosting stakeholder workshops to negotiate win-win settlements.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001235#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["biodiversity conservation","natural resource management"],"geography_discussed":["Kampala","Democratic Republic of the Congo"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["case study","stakeholder analysis","conflict mapping"]}]}