{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["conceptual"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'conceptual' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=conceptual","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"sei-000829","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/sei-000829","title":"Design Ecological Citizenship Wellbeing","publisher":{"name":"Stockholm Environment Institute","organization":"stockholm-environment-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2026-04-29","source_url":"https://www.sei.org/publications/design-ecological-citizenship-wellbeing/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The paper introduces the Preferable Futures (PF) Deck, a wellbeing intervention and toolkit developed through a 'research-through-design' process. Positioned at the intersection of participatory design, futures thinking, and ecological citizenship, the deck aims to inspire place-based action for an ecologically ethical transition by recognizing the link between human and planetary health. The authors propose a 'post-participatory intervention' model where designers act as catalysts for community-led practices rather than mere facilitators of predefined projects. The toolkit is intended for use by community organizers, educators, and policy-adjacent actors to facilitate democratic and ecological transformation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000829#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Preferable Futures (PF) Deck is a wellbeing intervention and toolkit designed to encourage reflection, imagination, and place-based action to support an ecologically ethical transition, based on the premise that planetary and human health are interconnected.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000829#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The authors introduce a 'post-participatory intervention' methodology where designers serve as catalysts and conveners for community-led practices that can evolve beyond the initial design framework, rather than just facilitating participation in set projects.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000829#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Testing of the PF Deck at the Royal College of Art, Falmouth University, and the London Design Festival showed it can facilitate systems literacy, values-based dialogue, and the co-design of civic futures focused on social and ecological flourishing.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"sei-000829#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["London","United Kingdom"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["methodological","conceptual"]},{"id":"iai-000037","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iai-000037","title":"¿Conviene seguir fomentando las plantaciones forestales en el norte de la Patagonia argentina? ¿Dónde, para qué, a quién le conviene?","publisher":{"name":"Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research","organization":"inter-american-institute-for-global-change-research"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"es","date_published":"2025-01-15","source_url":"https://iai.int/es/pub_acad/conviene-seguir-fomentando-las-plantaciones-forestales-en-el-norte-de-la-patagonia-argentina-donde-para-que-a-quien-le-conviene/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document argues that the Science and Technology system (SCyT) can improve decision-making regarding forest plantations in northwestern Patagonia by characterizing territorial heterogeneity, assessing land suitability and impacts, and analyzing the social construction of problems. It suggests using cause-and-effect trees and the analysis of Ecosystem Services (ES) to determine who benefits from these activities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000037#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Science and Technology system (SCyT) can contribute to the decision-making process for forest activities in Patagonia through three primary roles: characterizing the human and biophysical heterogeneity of the territorial system, defining the suitability of land units for forestry and evaluating their environmental, social, and economic impacts, and helping define the 'problem' based on the differing values of various actors.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000037#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Specific methodologies for SCyT to support decision-making include the construction of cause-and-effect trees and the analysis of changes in the provision of Ecosystem Services (SE) and the identification of those who appropriate the benefits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iai-000037#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["ecosystem service","environmental impact assessment"],"geography_discussed":["Argentina"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["conceptual"]}]}