{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["case narrative analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'case narrative analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=case+narrative+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"prio-001386","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001386","title":"Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/0d24b4d6-a0a8-4050-935c-e0261a8a53a2/Fighting at Home Fighting Abroad How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The research demonstrates that states experiencing civil wars are significantly more likely to be involved in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs). Using data from 1946 to 2001, the authors find that this 'civil peace' effect is comparable in magnitude to the 'democratic peace' effect. Analysis of over 400 MIDs reveals that the increased risk is driven by states attempting to influence the outcome of civil wars through direct intervention, externalization (such as cross-border counter-insurgency), and unintended spillovers, rather than by opportunistic attacks on weakened states or diversionary wars to consolidate domestic power.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Civil wars significantly increase the probability of militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) between states, with the effect being similar in magnitude to the 'democratic peace' effect.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The increased risk of interstate conflict associated with civil wars is primarily driven by efforts to influence the civil war's outcome through intervention, externalization, and spillovers, rather than unrelated issues.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Empirical data shows that the annual rate of MID onsets in dyads with a COW civil war (4.3%) is more than double the rate in dyads without a civil war (2.1%).","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"States experiencing civil wars are more likely to both initiate MIDs against other states and be the targets of MIDs initiated by others.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The 'surplus' of MIDs associated with civil wars can be entirely explained by cases of intervention, externalization, and spillover, suggesting that opportunism and diversion do not significantly increase the net rate of international conflict.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Externalization occurs when governments in civil wars conduct cross-border counter-insurgency raids or retaliatory attacks against neighbors supporting rebels.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Intervention is driven by states with conflicting preferences over the civil war's outcome, motivated by proxy wars, regime disputes, irredentism, protection of ethnic kin, or tit-for-tat retaliation.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Spillover effects, such as mass refugee migration and border fortification, can lead to the militarization of interstate relations.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-8","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The research finds that regime transitions (democratization) by themselves do not promote interstate disputes in the absence of civil wars, contradicting the 'dangerous democratization' thesis.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001386#insight-9","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Chad","Sudan","Israel","Lebanon","Vietnam","Iraq","Iran","Ethiopia","Eritrea","Pakistan","India","Serbia","Croatia","Bosnia and Herzegovina","Sri Lanka","Sierra Leone","Liberia","Libya","Myanmar","Thailand","Morocco","Algeria","Mauritania","Rwanda","Uganda","Democratic Republic of the Congo","Tanzania","Burundi","Haiti","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["quantitative analysis","case narrative analysis","dyadic analysis"]}]}