{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["bottom-up analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'bottom-up analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=bottom-up+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"newclim-000220","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/newclim-000220","title":"Countries start to explain how their climate contributions are fair","publisher":{"name":"NewClimate Institute","organization":"newclimate-institute"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2017-11-07","source_url":"https://newclimate.org/resources/publications/countries-start-to-explain-how-their-climate-contributions-are-fair-more","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The analysis of 163 INDCs reveals that countries frequently use 'small share' of global emissions and per capita emissions as equity indicators for mitigation, while vulnerability is a primary argument for adaptation. However, most equity claims are unsubstantiated or based on internal expertise, with a lack of independent evidence or consideration of the aggregate global impact of these individual approaches.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"newclim-000220#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Countries used various indicators to justify equity in mitigation, with the most frequent being a 'small share' of global emissions and per capita emissions. When using a consistent data set, the emissions of countries claiming a 'small share' actually total 24% of annual global emissions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"newclim-000220#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Adaptation is mentioned in 89% of INDCs, with two-thirds of those using vulnerability as an argument for equity and over half quantifying impacts.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"newclim-000220#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Most equity claims in the INDCs lack rigorous support, often relying on in-country experts rather than independent evidence, and none of the analyzed documents consider the global consequences if their specific equity approach were applied to all countries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"newclim-000220#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["Nationally Determined Contributions","climate justice","climate change mitigation","climate change adaptation","Paris Agreement","Global stocktake"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["bottom-up analysis"]},{"id":"cliinstca-000418","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/cliinstca-000418","title":"DAMAGE CONTROL","publisher":{"name":"Canadian Climate Institute","organization":"canadian-climate-institute"},"document_type":"executive summary","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://climateinstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Executive-summary-damage-control.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The report finds that climate change acts as a significant drag on Canada's economy, reducing GDP growth, causing job losses, and increasing fiscal pressure on governments. It highlights a 'broken window fallacy' where spending on repairs masks deeper losses in household income and productive investment. The analysis indicates that Northern Canada and Alberta are particularly vulnerable, and that a combination of proactive adaptation and low global emissions could reduce total real GDP losses by 75%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Climate change is projected to cause substantial national income losses in Canada, starting at $25 billion in 2025 (representing 50% of projected GDP growth for that year) and rising to between $391 billion (low-emissions) and $865 billion (high-emissions) annually by the end of the century.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Labor productivity and workforce size will decline due to premature deaths and heat-induced productivity losses, with job losses potentially reaching 500,000 by mid-century and 2.9 million by the end of the century.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Household income will decline more severely than topline GDP due to the 'broken window fallacy,' where resources are diverted to repair damaged assets rather than productive investments. By the end of the century in a median high-emissions scenario, GDP may fall by 12%, while household income falls by 18%.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Low-income households will be disproportionately affected by affordability pressures; by the end of the century in a high-emissions scenario, they face income cuts of 23%, compared to 19% for the median income group.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Geographic and sectoral impacts vary, with Northern Canada and Alberta facing the most significant losses. Northern Canada's losses are primarily driven by permafrost thaw, with potential GDP losses reaching $26,060 per capita by the end of the century in a high-emissions scenario.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Climate change creates a fiscal risk for governments, requiring tax increases to cover rising costs for disaster response, infrastructure, and healthcare. By the end of the century, tax rate increases of 1.4% (low-emissions) or 2.7% (high-emissions) would be needed to maintain services.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Combining proactive adaptation with global emissions reductions is the most effective strategy, potentially reducing Canada's total real GDP losses by 75%. Proactive adaptation offers a high return on investment, with every $1 spent yielding $13-$15 in total benefits.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"cliinstca-000418#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change adaptation","greenhouse gas emissions","climate finance"],"geography_discussed":["Northern Canada","Alberta"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["macroeconomic modelling","bottom-up analysis","scenario analysis"]}]}