{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["bibliometric analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'bibliometric analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=bibliometric+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"bc3res-000107","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/bc3res-000107","title":"Economics of Energy and Climate Change: Origins, Developments and Growth","publisher":{"name":"Basque Centre for Climate Change","organization":"basque-centre-for-climate-change"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2012-09","source_url":"https://www.bc3research.org/h6T8Uy8Nm4gFs0O/20120912122707580689978.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The paper analyzes the evolution of energy and climate change economics, noting a massive increase in research output since 2005. While quantity has surged, the author suggests a potential relative decline in originality compared to the 1990s.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Research output in energy economics experienced a dramatic increase starting in 2005. The number of articles in main energy economics journals rose from under 100 per year before 2005 to an average closer to 250 by the end of the decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The volume of research in energy and climate change issues grew ten-fold in the first decade of the twenty-first century, with the journal Energy Policy seeing an eight-fold increase in articles between 2000 and 2010.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Research intensity, measured as research output relative to global GDP, rose significantly from 13.2 articles per trillion dollars in 2005 to 38.9 articles per trillion dollars in 2010.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The author hypothesises that while the 1990s saw a growth in research originality and the creation of new 'research fronts', the period following the 2005 explosion has been characterized by a relative decline in originality as the field shifted toward refining and applying existing ideas.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Analysis of working papers in the nep-ene reports between 2000 and 2010 shows that oil (averaging 18% between 2006-2010) and natural gas (averaging 4%) became more prominent, while the share of papers on electricity declined from over 24% (2002-2005) to 13% in the latter half of the decade.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The growth in research output is attributed to several factors: increased investment in the knowledge economy, the ease of production via computers and the internet, academic pressure to publish, and a specific demand for understanding energy markets and climate change.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Bibliometric data on average citations per article suggests a peak in influence or originality between 2001 and 2005, though the author notes this is a crude metric subject to lags and internet-driven citation increases.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"bc3res-000107#insight-7","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate policy","carbon tax","Emissions trading","renewable energy","biofuel","energy efficiency","climate change mitigation","climate change adaptation"],"geography_discussed":["Spain","United States","European Union"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["bibliometric analysis","literature review"]},{"id":"prio-001854","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/prio-001854","title":"What’s in a number? How (and why) measuring research productivity in different ways changes the gender gap","publisher":{"name":"Peace Research Institute Oslo","organization":"peace-research-institute-oslo"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":null,"source_url":"https://cdn.cloud.prio.org/files/89524d82-c590-47b2-b188-e4b6925d2aa5/Whats in a number How and why measuring research productivity in different ways changes the gender gap.pdf?inline=true","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The study analyzes publication data from 91 researchers at a Norwegian social science institute between 2010 and 2014 to demonstrate that the 'gender gap' in productivity is highly sensitive to the chosen metric. While men appear significantly more productive when only journal articles are counted, the gap narrows when books and book chapters are included, and it can even reverse when co-authorship is fractionalized for certain ranks. The authors argue that academic writing is a situated social practice, and that standard bibliometric indicators often fail to capture gendered differences in publication patterns, such as women's tendency toward more diverse output and different collaboration networks.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The measured gender gap varies significantly based on the publication types included; men's average annual productivity is approximately 50% greater than women's when only journal articles are counted, but the gap reduces when other publications are added and weighted.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Weighting for high-prestige 'Level 2' channels and rewarding international collaboration tends to increase the measured gender gap, indicating that men publish more frequently in top-tier channels and engage more in international co-authorship.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Fractionalizing co-authorship (giving authors only a share of the credit) reduces the aggregate gender gap, but its effect varies by methodological orientation: it reduces the gap for quantitative researchers while increasing it for qualitative researchers.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The gender gap is strongly influenced by academic rank; while it appears to widen with rank when counting only articles, the gap almost disappears for professors when diverse outputs are included and weighted.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Accounting for leaves of absence disproportionately benefits women's productivity scores, increasing their measured productivity by approximately 12% compared to a 4% increase for men.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Language background and mobility interact with gender; women with an English language background (who were all external to the institute's core staff) were found to be more productive than both their internal female counterparts and men.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"prio-001854#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["bibliometric analysis","gender study","institutional research"]}]}