{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["best practices review"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'best practices review' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":2,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=best+practices+review","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"iisd-000735","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-000735","title":"Transparency in the Dispute Settlement Process: Country best practices","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"guide","language":"en","date_published":"2011-12-19","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/publications/guide/transparency-dispute-settlement-process-country-best-practices","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document addresses the historical lack of transparency in investor-state arbitrations, noting that this opacity often results from treaties being silent on confidentiality. It highlights a growing trend where states are inserting specific transparency provisions into their treaties to increase public access to information. The text focuses on the approaches of specific nations including Canada, the United States, Chile, Singapore, Australia, and New Zealand, as well as regional agreements like NAFTA and COMESA.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000735#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Historically, investor-state arbitrations have been characterized by a lack of transparency, making it difficult to identify when disputes are initiated, the arguments used, or the final awards made.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000735#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The lack of transparency in these proceedings is not a treaty requirement but occurs because treaties are frequently silent regarding transparency and confidentiality.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000735#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"In response to mounting concerns over public access to information, states have begun incorporating transparency provisions directly into their treaties.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-000735#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["transparency"],"geography_discussed":["Canada","United States","Chile","Singapore","Australia","New Zealand"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["best practices review"]},{"id":"iisd-001767","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/iisd-001767","title":"Using Performance Information in Government Budgeting and Reporting","publisher":{"name":"International Institute for Sustainable Development","organization":"international-institute-for-sustainable-development"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2006-03","source_url":"https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/measure_performance_info.pdf","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","geography_discussed","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines the challenges and successes of linking government goals to budget activities through performance measurement. It analyzes the federal Government of Canada's frameworks, Alberta's 'Measuring Up' system, a healthcare case study at Toronto East General Hospital, and the Oregon Benchmarks system. A central theme is the 'attribution' problem, where high-level social outcomes are influenced by factors beyond government control, necessitating a results chain from activities to high-level outcomes.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"The Government of Canada utilizes the Treasury Board Management Accountability Framework and the Management, Resources and Results Structure Policy (effective April 1, 2005) to standardize the reporting of financial and non-financial performance information.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Despite federal frameworks, the Auditor General of Canada reported in April 2005 that the quality of departmental performance reporting remains low, noting that balanced reporting—admitting both successes and shortcomings—is not yet part of the management culture.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Alberta's 'Measuring Up' system has evolved into a governance and accountability system that employs goal-based budgeting, where expenditures are aligned with 12 overarching government goals and 76 performance measures as of the 2004-07 Business Plan.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A case study of the Toronto East General Hospital demonstrates a strategic management system that links resource allocation to performance via a rolling three-year strategic plan and adapted balanced scorecards featuring 'accountability action plans'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The Oregon Benchmarks system, managed by the independent Oregon Progress Board, uses 90 benchmarks across seven indicator sets to track a broad societal vision, linking these high-level measures to specific agency performance reports and expenditure priorities.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-5","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"A fundamental challenge in performance measurement is 'attribution', as high-level social outcomes (such as population health) are affected by external influences beyond government program activity.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"iisd-001767#insight-6","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":[],"geography_discussed":["Toronto","Washington","United States"],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["best practices review","case study"]}]}