{"query_echo":{"q":"","filters":{"analysis_type":["actor-network analysis"]},"warnings":[{"code":"facet_value_not_in_vocabulary","message":"Value 'actor-network analysis' for facet 'analysis_type' is not in the controlled vocabulary."}]},"total":{"value":1,"relation":"eq"},"page":1,"page_size":20,"self":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/api/v1/search?analysis_type=actor-network+analysis","stability":"beta","ai_marking":{"digital_source_type":{"uri":"http://cv.iptc.org/newscodes/digitalsourcetype/trainedAlgorithmicMedia","name":"Created using Generative AI"},"notice":"Summary and key insights are generated using artificial intelligence."},"results":[{"id":"saiia-000152","url":"https://climateinsightsdirectory.org/document/saiia-000152","title":"Seeing the Forest and the Trees: The Global Challenge of Regulating Social Media for Democracy","publisher":{"name":"South African Institute of International Affairs","organization":"south-african-institute-of-international-affairs"},"document_type":"research paper","language":"en","date_published":"2023-12-04","source_url":"https://saiia.org.za/research/seeing-the-forest-and-the-trees-the-global-challenge-of-regulating-social-media-for-democracy/","generator":"Climate Insights Directory","generated_fields":["summary","key_insights","climate_tags","analysis_type"],"summary":{"text":"The document examines the dual nature of social media as a tool that both supports and undermines democratic processes. It highlights how platforms enable protest movements like 'Black Lives Matter' and 'Rhodes Must Fall' to shift political agendas, while simultaneously allowing negative actors to deploy misinformation and surveillance. The author argues that because these platforms are privately owned and monetise interaction, they create a complex regulatory ecosystem requiring a holistic response rather than a binary view of the technology as purely good or bad.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-000152#summary","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},"key_insights":[{"text":"Social media platforms are unified by several core characteristics: they are internet-based, designed for interaction, primarily allow broadcasting, and are operated by private corporations that monetise user interactions.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-000152#insight-1","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Social media has positively impacted democracy by allowing protest communities, specifically 'Black Lives Matter' and 'Rhodes Must Fall', to amplify demands and connect across political and geographical boundaries.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-000152#insight-2","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"The potential for social media to undermine democracy stems from both inherent platform qualities—such as the reinforcement of insular views and the ability to purchase visibility—and the actions of well-funded actors using the platforms for disinformation, misinformation, and surveillance.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-000152#insight-3","date_modified":"2026-10-23"},{"text":"Regulators face a complex challenge in balancing the positive outcomes of social networking with the significant harms they cause, necessitating a regulatory framework that moves beyond a simple dichotomy of the technology being 'good' or 'bad'.","ai_generated":true,"unit":"saiia-000152#insight-4","date_modified":"2026-10-23"}],"climate_tags":["climate change disinformation"],"geography_discussed":[],"frame_perspective":[],"analysis_type":["regulatory analysis","actor-network analysis"]}]}